thanks Robert and Chris for coming back to this, I do agree with Robert
those javadoc comments are very important and often just the first thing
one dev would look into.
Also it'd be nice to have the mentioned check in the build.
Thanks,
Tommaso
2012/9/28 Robert Muir
> I will do this!
>
> On Fr
I will do this!
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3904
>
> If someone who knows more then me about the build/smoke checks can attach
> a patch with the neccessary bits to make the build fail when solr packages
> don't have packa
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3904
If someone who knows more then me about the build/smoke checks can attach
a patch with the neccessary bits to make the build fail when solr packages
don't have package level docs, i'll work towards getting the build to pass
with that patch.
: Fi
I wanted to respond to Tommaso's comment in the release vote in a
separate thread for discussion:
> one thing I noticed is :
> "no package description (missing package.html in src?)"
> for most of the Solr source code therefore we should add those
> package(-info).html for the javadoc.
We've bee
