ng, but I'm not really sure that it's needed for
> anyone.
>
> Could you please provide feedback for the latest patch, and/or move it forth
> or back?
>
> Regards
>
>> by Martijn v Groningen-2 on Feb 06, 2012; 7:57pm
>> URL:
>> http://lucene.4720
he latest patch, and/or move it
forth or back?
Regards
> by *Martijn v Groningen-2* on *Feb 06, 2012; 7:57pm*
> *URL:*
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ToParentBlockJoinQuery-vs-filtered-search-tp3717911p3719987.html
> Hi Mikhail,
> There is already an issue open for supp
Mikhail,
I'll dig into this and post back on the issue... I think something is
indeed not right! Thanks for raising this :)
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Mikhail Khludnev
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Mikhail Khludnev
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for resolving my hesitations. It allows me move forward.
>
> You're welcome!
>
> >> It looks like that's what your test case is testing
Hi Mikhail,
There is already an issue open for supporting block join in Solr:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3076
Maybe you can attach your work in that issue and we can iterate from there.
Martijn
On 6 February 2012 14:54, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:43
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Mikhail Khludnev
wrote:
> Thanks for resolving my hesitations. It allows me move forward.
You're welcome!
>> It looks like that's what your test case is testing for...? Does it pass?
>
> Of course it doesn't.
> the first reason is that BlockJoinWeight.scorer()
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
>
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> BlockJoinQParserPlugin sounds cool!
>
> I think you're right: the incoming filter will apply to the "to"
> document space. So, for ToParentBJQ it's parent docs, and ToChildBJQ
> it's child docs. The filter only needs t
Hi Mikhail,
BlockJoinQParserPlugin sounds cool!
I think you're right: the incoming filter will apply to the "to"
document space. So, for ToParentBJQ it's parent docs, and ToChildBJQ
it's child docs. The filter only needs to define the bits for docs in
that "to" space... the other bits will not
Hello,
I'd like to contribute BlockJoinQParserPlugin for Solr. It's not a very big
deal, but I'm stuck during writing filtered search test cases. At the first
glance it looks like deja vu for another "join"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3062
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/tru
