+1
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 6. mars 2012, at 03:00, Robert Muir wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can we get any pending issues for 3.6 resolved in the next two weeks?
>
> I think we should then release 3.6, freeze 3.x
+1
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> +1
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can we get any pending issues for 3.6 resolved in the next two weeks?
>>
>> I think we should then relea
+1
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can we get any pending issues for 3.6 resolved in the next two weeks?
>
> I think we should then release 3.6, freeze 3.x for maintenance, and
> create branch_4x to work towards a 4.
+1
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Martijn v Groningen
wrote:
> +1!
>
>
> On 6 March 2012 07:35, Shai Erera wrote:
>>>
>>> I think we should then release 3.6, freeze 3.x for maintenance, and
>>> create branch_4x to work towards a 4.0 beta (this is March 2012).
>>
>>
>> +1.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 6
+1!
On 6 March 2012 07:35, Shai Erera wrote:
> I think we should then release 3.6, freeze 3.x for maintenance, and
>> create branch_4x to work towards a 4.0 beta (this is March 2012).
>>
>
> +1.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can we get any pending is
>
> I think we should then release 3.6, freeze 3.x for maintenance, and
> create branch_4x to work towards a 4.0 beta (this is March 2012).
>
+1.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can we get any pending issues for 3.6 resolved in the next two weeks?
>
> I think we
