[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914960#action_12914960
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2649:
I think we have a synchronization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914972#action_12914972
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2668:
--
bq. Or do we think apps are not relying on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914973#action_12914973
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--
bq. It's just that perhaps we should upgrade
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914988#action_12914988
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2665:
{quote}
bq. In fact I'm +1 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914989#action_12914989
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2649:
{quote}
We just need to watch the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914990#action_12914990
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2527:
I believe LUCENE-2649 has fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914996#action_12914996
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2668:
--
bq. Seems like we should fix LUCENE-2529 for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914995#action_12914995
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2134:
--
This looks great!
So it moves the sort
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12914998#action_12914998
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2665:
Awesome -- this patch moves the
NumericRangeQuery.NumericRangeTermsEnum sometimes seeks backwards
-
Key: LUCENE-2669
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2669
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2669:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2669.patch
Patch w/ 2 asserts. NRQ only trips up on the first
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915013#action_12915013
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2669:
-
This is a good catch: NRQ should play ping-pong
allow automatontermsenum to work on full byte range
---
Key: LUCENE-2670
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2670
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2670:
Attachment: LUCENE-2670.patch
allow automatontermsenum to work on full byte range
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-2669:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
NumericRangeQuery.NumericRangeTermsEnum sometimes seeks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2669:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2669.patch
Here a patch that fixed NRTE to only seek forward. This should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2669:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2669.patch
Slightly more readable patch: for(;;)-loop removed and so first
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2669:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
NumericRangeQuery.NumericRangeTermsEnum sometimes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915032#action_12915032
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2669:
---
bq. Mike you set this as fix 3.1 and 4.0,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915039#action_12915039
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
Thanks Mike, I'll take a look and fix the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915045#action_12915045
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-2134:
-
bq. If you pass null for the missing value then
Add sort missing first/last ability to SortField and ValueComparator
Key: LUCENE-2671
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2671
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated LUCENE-2671:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2671-SortMissingLast.patch
This is the lucene only parts of SOLR-2134
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915058#action_12915058
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2527:
---
Yes, LUCENE-2649 puts fasterButMoreRAM=
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915060#action_12915060
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-2668:
Ok, I'll see this issue and LUCENE-2529
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi reassigned LUCENE-2668:
--
Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi
offset gap should be added regardless of existence of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-2529:
---
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915062#action_12915062
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-2660:
--
Alex, I think Lucene Solr use the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915070#action_12915070
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2562:
-
If you just want to check out the current state
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915072#action_12915072
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--
bq. if you pass a different parser for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915074#action_12915074
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
bq. If that were true, it would have broken
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915079#action_12915079
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2662:
--
Simon, the patch looks like it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915080#action_12915080
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
Ok, that makes sense -- what I mean is that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915083#action_12915083
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2671:
--
Ah - I was just about to report hmmm, doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915083#action_12915083
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-2671 at 9/26/10 8:27 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915084#action_12915084
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649:
--
bq. Ok, that makes sense - what I mean is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-2134:
Attachment: SOLR-2134-SortMissingLast.patch
Here is an updated patch that includes everything from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915089#action_12915089
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-2134:
-
this is the Tri* getSortField code:
{code:java}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-2668:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2668.patch
New patch attached. It includes LUCENE-2529 and its test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915106#action_12915106
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2649:
---
bq. What you can not do is as for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2670.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 1001588.
allow automatontermsenum to work on full byte
speed up automaton seeking in nextString
Key: LUCENE-2672
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2672
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2672:
Attachment: LUCENE-2672.patch
here is a prototype patch, needs more testing and benchmarking.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915129#action_12915129
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2134:
-
For floats you may not use MIN_VALUE and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915130#action_12915130
]
Jason Rutherglen edited comment on LUCENE-2575 at 9/27/10 1:44 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915132#action_12915132
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2134:
Heh, yeah - Double.MIN_VALUE is only the smallest
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Christian Heimes wrote:
I like to request a new feature for the next version of PyLucene. Lucene
already comes with a collation library but PyLucene doesn't wrap it.
Collation is required for language depending sorting of search results. [1]
I've attached a working patch
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, Bill Janssen wrote:
Right now you've got this one:
ANALYZERS_JAR=$(LUCENE)/build/contrib/analyzers/common/lucene-analyzers-$(LUCENE_VER).jar
How about adding:
SMARTCNA_JAR=$(LUCENE)/build/contrib/analyzers/smartcn/lucene-smartcn-$(LUCENE_VER).jar
and then adding
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Robert Muir wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
Doing so causes this complaint to be emitted while building the
wrappers:
WARNING: Can not find lexical dictionary directory!
WARNING: This will cause unpredictable exceptions in
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Robert Muir wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
Doing so causes this complaint to be emitted while building the
wrappers:
WARNING: Can not find lexical
50 matches
Mail list logo
