management of many machines

2011-02-23 Thread Li Li
hi when we have more and more machines, we have replications of indexes and also many shards which hold a part of the whole indexes. we have to do many things: fail-over, load balance, log collecting, monitoring each machine's status, Solr only did a small number of these now.

Re: Threading of JIRA e-mails in gmail?

2011-02-23 Thread Israel Tsadok
I'm not sure if this solution has been suggested, but I just noticed that the gmail threading algorithm ignores the bracketed part of the subject line. (I couldn't find it documented officially, though). That means that if JIRA subject lines can indeed be customized to say e.g. [JIRA - Created:]

Re: Threading of JIRA e-mails in gmail?

2011-02-23 Thread Dawid Weiss
I didn't know about this, very interesting. You'd need to contact Apache infrastructure folks -- jira is shared among all the projects, so I don't think it'll be easy. Dawid On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Israel Tsadok itsa...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure if this solution has been suggested,

BerlinBuzzwords CfP - one week to go

2011-02-23 Thread Simon Willnauer
As a reminder: the call for presentations of Berlin Buzzwords will close next week on Tuesday, March 1st. Submissions on scalable search, data storage and analysis are all welcome. We are looking for presentations on the core technologies such as Apache Hadoop, CouchDB, Lucene, Redis, Voldemort

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1632) Distributed IDF

2011-02-23 Thread Thorsten Scherler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998262#comment-12998262 ] Thorsten Scherler commented on SOLR-1632: - Regarding the comment Perhaps one idea

Re: Facet search

2011-02-23 Thread Simon Willnauer
This is another indicator that we should really try to extract Solr's capabilities like Faceting into modules! Solr should not be required if you want to use the facteing stuff we already have. simon On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Wouter Heijke whei...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi, Same here, don't

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2374) Create UpdateFileRequestHandler

2011-02-23 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998281#comment-12998281 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2374: --- I raised the question about correct Zk usage in this

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2933) Two-stage state expansion for the FST: distance-from-root and child-count criteria.

2011-02-23 Thread Dawid Weiss (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-2933. - Resolution: Fixed Lucene Fields: (was: [New]) In trunk. Two-stage state expansion

Re: [HUDSON] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1475 - Failure

2011-02-23 Thread Simon Willnauer
Michael did you try with the reproduce commandline? ant test-core -Dtestcase=TestIndexWriterExceptions -Dtestmethod=testDocumentsWriterExceptions -Dtests.seed=5748357769164696038:5339220614554941881 that one fails all the time on my machine simon On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Michael Busch

RE: Facet search

2011-02-23 Thread Uwe Schindler
Strong +1!!! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:31 AM To: java-u...@lucene.apache.org Cc:

Re: Facet search

2011-02-23 Thread Tommaso Teofili
+1 (I've just crossed path with a Lucene faceting requirement) Tommaso 2011/2/23 Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de Strong +1!!! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Simon Willnauer

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998318#comment-12998318 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2936: - Hi Uwe: you are right! obviously this one

Re: [HUDSON] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1475 - Failure

2011-02-23 Thread Simon Willnauer
this seems indeed to be related to the changes in LUCENE-2881. This test indexed a document with TV enabled adds a new FieldInfo which sets hasVectors=true but then hits an exception before the tvx file gets created. This is as far as have observed by looking at the code and the place where it

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2936: Attachment: LUCENE-2936.patch Here's a new patch... apparently there was code in SmallFloat to

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-2936: --- Assignee: Robert Muir score and explain don't match -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2894) Use of google-code-prettify for Lucene/Solr Javadoc

2011-02-23 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998357#comment-12998357 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2894: - {quote} Solr.analysis classes(I to Z) have

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2349) Wrong matches count with groupped results

2011-02-23 Thread Hasan Ince (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998364#comment-12998364 ] Hasan Ince commented on SOLR-2349: -- hi I live for the solution of the problem. I could

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998373#comment-12998373 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2936: -- {code} public boolean isMatch() {

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998375#comment-12998375 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2936: --- This line of code was also one of the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998376#comment-12998376 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2936: - {quote} Isn't that a bug? We fixed our search

[HUDSON] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 5223 - Failure

2011-02-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/5223/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterExceptions.testDocumentsWriterExceptions Error Message: _1.tvx Stack Trace: java.io.FileNotFoundException: _1.tvx at

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998383#comment-12998383 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2936: -- I'm not sure why this is a quantization

[HUDSON] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 5224 - Still Failing

2011-02-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/5224/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterExceptions.testDocumentsWriterExceptions Error Message: _1.tvx Stack Trace: java.io.FileNotFoundException: _1.tvx at

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC1

2011-02-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-02-23, Troy Howard wrote: I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC1 is available and ready for your testing and voting. Great. I could successfully verify your PGP signature. Release candidate artifacts:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998403#comment-12998403 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2936: -- OK, although underflow is generally handled,

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998406#comment-12998406 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2936: - Thanks, so the bug is really my imagination

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2894) Use of google-code-prettify for Lucene/Solr Javadoc

2011-02-23 Thread Koji Sekiguchi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998433#comment-12998433 ] Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-2894: bq. This is a really great start towards

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2611) IntelliJ IDEA and Eclipse setup

2011-02-23 Thread David Smiley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998435#comment-12998435 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-2611: -- Steven, I think the IntelliJ IDEA

Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28

2011-02-23 Thread Michael Herndon
I've been keeping up on the e-mail items as they floods in ;) Design: Layout and clean readable typography are probably whats important at this point till other things fall into place. I can probably help with design / css. Though still recovering from work recent sickness (tis that time of

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2937) small float underflow detection bug

2011-02-23 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
small float underflow detection bug --- Key: LUCENE-2937 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2937 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.9 Reporter: Yonik

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2611) IntelliJ IDEA and Eclipse setup

2011-02-23 Thread Steven Rowe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998437#comment-12998437 ] Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2611: - David, I like the idea. Are project-level

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2937) small float underflow detection bug

2011-02-23 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998439#comment-12998439 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2937: -- 1.9 is the earliest affects version we have

Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28

2011-02-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-02-23, Michael Herndon wrote: Also, I'm already leaning towards hudson since we're limited to CI choices supported by apache. This is likely to become Jenkins rather than Hudson soon. Stefan

Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28

2011-02-23 Thread Wyatt Barnett
I'm pretty good with the HTML/CSS stuff -- pretty much cut my teeth in this industry doing lots of web design/publishing. Definitely willing to help. CI -- there are three problems we need to look at: a) Project being setup for CI. This means that you can literally check out and build. VS 2010

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1656) XInclude's are resolved relative CWD, not instance dir

2011-02-23 Thread David Smiley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley updated SOLR-1656: --- Attachment: Support_SAX_SystemId_via_wrapping_InputStream.patch I provided an updated patch: * Using

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2937) small float underflow detection bug

2011-02-23 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-2937: - Attachment: LUCENE-2937.patch Here's a patch - the fix to SmallFloat turned out easier than I

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2937) small float underflow detection bug

2011-02-23 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998463#comment-12998463 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2937: - Thanks Yonik. I tested the patch, this solves

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1656) XInclude's are resolved relative CWD, not instance dir

2011-02-23 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998505#comment-12998505 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1656: - This path at least fixes the CWD problem in an

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1656) XInclude's are resolved relative CWD, not instance dir

2011-02-23 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998509#comment-12998509 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1656: - Hoss: {quote} I'm not positive, believe we

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC1

2011-02-23 Thread Troy Howard
I'll work on implementing those changes. Regarding directory structure, this was mimicing the previous releases. I think the theory was that the two .zip files could be overlayed on the same directory structure and end up with everything being in the same location as if you'd built from source.

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998517#comment-12998517 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-2936: -- bq. Isn't that a bug? bq. We fixed our search code

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC1

2011-02-23 Thread Michael Herndon
I'm curious about the practice of putting license information into all files. The reasoning and etc. Is due to legal reasons or is it due to good practices? would providing short copyright info and relative path to the license suffice or is the full license required? Has not doing so cause

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC1

2011-02-23 Thread Troy Howard
As a side note: Whenever we get our CI server setup, we should probably have a build task which checks for licensing in code files and inserts it if it's not there. Thanks, Troy On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Michael Herndon mhern...@o19s.com wrote: I'm curious about the practice of putting

Re: [HUDSON] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1475 - Failure

2011-02-23 Thread Michael Busch
I was also able to reproduce this failure locally. So the problem only happens for segments that had document(s) with term vectors, but which all hit non-aborting exceptions. In that case the corresponding FieldInfo(s) will have term vectors enabled, but no TV files will have been written

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2937) small float underflow detection bug

2011-02-23 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-2937. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.1 small float underflow detection bug

[HUDSON] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 5224 - Failure

2011-02-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/5224/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat.testFloatToByte Error Message: expected:0 but was:1 Stack Trace: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:0 but was:1 at

Re: [HUDSON] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 5224 - Failure

2011-02-23 Thread Uwe Schindler
That's backwards tests! -- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de Apache Hudson Server hud...@hudson.apache.org schrieb: Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/5224/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION:

[HUDSON] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 5225 - Still Failing

2011-02-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/5225/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat.testFloatToByte Error Message: expected:0 but was:1 Stack Trace: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:0 but was:1 at

[HUDSON] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 5226 - Still Failing

2011-02-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/5226/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat.testFloatToByte Error Message: expected:0 but was:1 Stack Trace: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:0 but was:1 at

RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes

2011-02-23 Thread Digy
See the patch for Lucene.Net.Util at http://people.apache.org/~digy/Lucene.Net.Util.patch I haven't looked at test cases or run unit tests. But It is that easy to port fixes for 4 files under Lucene.Net.Util DIGY -Original Message- From: Lombard, Scott

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2349) Wrong matches count with groupped results

2011-02-23 Thread Anton (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998597#comment-12998597 ] Anton commented on SOLR-2349: - Hi, Hasan! I already told you my solution by faceting on sortid

[Lucene.Net] [jira] Assigned: (LUCENENET-382) Create a wiki page for Lucene.Net

2011-02-23 Thread Prescott Nasser (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prescott Nasser reassigned LUCENENET-382: - Assignee: Prescott Nasser Create a wiki page for Lucene.Net

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2611) IntelliJ IDEA and Eclipse setup

2011-02-23 Thread David Smiley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley updated LUCENE-2611: - Attachment: LUCENE-2611_intellij_fix_codestyle.patch This patch uses a project-specified code

[HUDSON] Lucene-3.x - Build # 290 - Failure

2011-02-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-3.x/290/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat.testFloatToByte Error Message: expected:0 but was:1 Stack Trace: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:0 but was:1 at

[HUDSON] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 5227 - Still Failing

2011-02-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/5227/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat.testFloatToByte Error Message: expected:0 but was:1 Stack Trace: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:0 but was:1 at

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man updated LUCENE-2936: - Attachment: LUCENE-2936.test.patch I don't understand 95% of what yonik robert have been saying in

[Lucene.Net] [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-382) Create a wiki page for Lucene.Net

2011-02-23 Thread Prescott Nasser (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998617#comment-12998617 ] Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-382: --- Our Confluence Wiki is located

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998623#comment-12998623 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2936: - {noformat} I don't understand 95% of what

[HUDSON] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 5228 - Still Failing

2011-02-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/5228/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat.testFloatToByte Error Message: expected:0 but was:1 Stack Trace: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:0 but was:1 at

Re: [HUDSON] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 5228 - Still Failing

2011-02-23 Thread Yonik Seeley
Hmmm, no idea why the merge from trunk failed, and why ant test succeeded for me before I committed, but I'm looking into this now. -Yonik http://lucidimagination.com On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Apache Hudson Server hud...@hudson.apache.org wrote: Build:

[HUDSON] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 5229 - Still Failing

2011-02-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/5229/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSmallFloat.testFloatToByte Error Message: expected:0 but was:1 Stack Trace: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:0 but was:1 at

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man updated LUCENE-2936: - Attachment: LUCENE-2936.patch This superceeds my test patch by actually including the fix as well.

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2936) score and explain don't match

2011-02-23 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man updated LUCENE-2936: - Fix Version/s: 4.0 3.1 score and explain don't match -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2894) Use of google-code-prettify for Lucene/Solr Javadoc

2011-02-23 Thread Koji Sekiguchi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998660#comment-12998660 ] Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-2894: Committed S-to-Z in r1074009 (trunk) and

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2286) Automatically detecting Date/Time format in the DIH

2011-02-23 Thread Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998669#comment-12998669 ] Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-2286: Adam, want to turn that into a patch? I

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2894) Use of google-code-prettify for Lucene/Solr Javadoc

2011-02-23 Thread Koji Sekiguchi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998671#comment-12998671 ] Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-2894: Committed O-to-R in r1074017 (trunk) and

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2286) Automatically detecting Date/Time format in the DIH

2011-02-23 Thread Adam Estrada (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998680#comment-12998680 ] Adam Estrada commented on SOLR-2286: Otis, I would love to help on this because I do

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2286) Automatically detecting Date/Time format in the DIH

2011-02-23 Thread Ryan McKinley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998684#comment-12998684 ] Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-2286: - check:

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1718) Carriage return should submit query admin form

2011-02-23 Thread David Smiley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley updated SOLR-1718: --- Attachment: SOLR-1718_default_search_screen.patch The attached patch changes the input type of the

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-2349) Wrong matches count with groupped results

2011-02-23 Thread Hasan Ince (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998725#comment-12998725 ] Hasan Ince commented on SOLR-2349: -- Hi Anton, first of all thank you very much for your

Re: [Lucene.Net] Re: Signing Binary Releases

2011-02-23 Thread Troy Howard
That makes sense. We've been serving up the distributions from ~/lucene.net/site/download in our svn repo through the website. I guess with this release, once it passes the IPMC vote, we can create a lucene.net under http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ and serve from there? Should we also move

RE: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28

2011-02-23 Thread Prescott Nasser
I'm out of town this weekend, but I'm hoping to get one or two designs (likely just screenshots) attached to the JIRA so people can give me some feedback. I'll make it quick turn around and won't leave it open for feedback long though. If anyone has ideas / thoughts, samples they like, comment

[Lucene.Net] [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-403) Improve site layout and design

2011-02-23 Thread Prescott Nasser (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998248#comment-12998248 ] Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-403: --- Some sites that we are

Re: [Lucene.Net] Re: Signing Binary Releases

2011-02-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-02-23, Troy Howard wrote: That makes sense. We've been serving up the distributions from ~/lucene.net/site/download in our svn repo through the website. Ah, understood. This is not the way you should do it - in fact you should never have done. Releases are supposed to take advantage

Re: [Lucene.Net] how to make the search not case sensitive

2011-02-23 Thread Wen Gao
Thanks, I solved this problem. I found that if what i typed is lowercase, the result is not case senstive, e.g. if search for database it would return DATABASE, database. However, if what i typed is uppercase, the result is case sensitive, e.g. if search for DATABASE, no results would return. So

Re: [Lucene.Net] Phrase search with Wildcard query

2011-02-23 Thread Christopher Currens
Check that you're using the same analyzer that you indexed with to search against that particular field. Also, wildcard queries don't really handle spaces. I suggest using the query parser if you want to have multiple terms to search the same field by. Considering your previous query, you'll

[Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes

2011-02-23 Thread Lombard, Scott
Troy, I will start adding separate JIRA issues tonight. In the past do all the Java Lucene issues translate into .Net issues? Scott On Wed, Feb 23, 2011at 2:20 PM ,Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] wrote: Scott, I would say the first task would be to collect all the Java changes

[Lucene.Net] [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-399) Port changes from Java Lucene 2.9.3 and 2.9.4 releases

2011-02-23 Thread Digy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998559#comment-12998559 ] Digy commented on LUCENENET-399: {quote} Scott, I would say the first task would be to

[Lucene.Net] [jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-403) Improve site layout and design

2011-02-23 Thread Prescott Nasser (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prescott Nasser updated LUCENENET-403: -- Attachment: layout1.zip Based mostly on bitbucket.org. Takes some elements from

RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes

2011-02-23 Thread Digy
2.3.1-2.3.2 or 2.9.1 - 2.9.2 transitions were done with just a single patch, for ex. DIGY -Original Message- From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slomb...@kingindustries.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:36 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for

RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes

2011-02-23 Thread Digy
In the time needed to create 10s of issues, half of the fixes could be done :) DIGY -Original Message- From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slomb...@kingindustries.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:36 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java

RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes

2011-02-23 Thread Lombard, Scott
You're probably right DIGY. I will take a look at issues and create JIRA issues where the complexity deems it appropriate. I will comment or patch otherwise. Scott -Original Message- From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:02 PM To:

RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes

2011-02-23 Thread Digy
We can take,for ex, a namespace like Lucene.Net.Util(+test cases) and create a single patch for all of the related issues. (This approach needs to work on svn history, not on issues) DIGY -Original Message- From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slomb...@kingindustries.com] Sent: Thursday,

RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes

2011-02-23 Thread Digy
Instead of looking at issues, use TortoiseSVN's compare revision utility. Some issues seem to be complex but patches are really simple. See the fix for 2 of 103 files below DIGY Index: Constants.cs === --- Constants.cs

[Lucene.Net] [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-380) Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool

2011-02-23 Thread Alex Thompson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998626#comment-12998626 ] Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-380: - That's worth a shot I guess. Forum

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC1

2011-02-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-02-23, Troy Howard wrote: Whenever we get our CI server setup, we should probably have a build task which checks for licensing in code files and inserts it if it's not there. Buildbot http://ci.apache.org/buildbot.html can be set up to create RAT reports, even for projects that use

pass compressed string

2011-02-23 Thread Roman Chyla
Hello, I would like to transfer results from python to java: hello = zlib.compress(hello) on the java side do: byte[] data = string.getBytes() But I am not successful. Is there any translation going on somewhere? Thank you, Roman

Re: pass compressed string

2011-02-23 Thread Andi Vajda
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Roman Chyla wrote: I would like to transfer results from python to java: hello = zlib.compress(hello) on the java side do: byte[] data = string.getBytes() But I am not successful. Is there any translation going on somewhere? Can you be more specific ? Actual lines of