[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-432.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Lucene.Net 2.9.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-430.
Resolution: Fixed
Instead of creating a small project, I put it into Contrib.Analyzers.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061125#comment-13061125
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-418:
It works! Thanks.
DIGY
LuceneTestCase should not
I have built something similar using NTFS hard-links and re-using existing
local snapshot files, etc. It runs in production for 3+ years now with more
than 100 million docs, and distributes new snapshots from master servers every
minute. It does not use any rsync, but only leverages unique
AttributeSource can have an invalid computed state (LUCENE-3042)
Key: LUCENENET-433
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-433
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061214#comment-13061214
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-433:
Here is the test case
{code}
[Test]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-172.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Digy (was: Scott Lombard)
Fixed in 2.9.4g. No fix for 2.9.4
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061063#comment-13061063
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3279:
-
I plan to commit this soon if nobody
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061066#comment-13061066
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3216:
-
I plan to commit this soon if nobody
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Toke Eskildsen updated LUCENE-3262:
---
Attachment: TestPerformanceHack.java
CorpusGenerator.java
I've attached a
Allow ability to set maxDocCharsToAnalyze in WeightedSpanTermExtractor
--
Key: LUCENE-3287
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3287
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jahangir Anwari updated LUCENE-3287:
Attachment: WeightedSpanTermExtractor.patch
CustomHighlighter.java
Allow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061129#comment-13061129
]
Monica Storfjord commented on SOLR-1945:
What is the status on this proposal? It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated SOLR-2452:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2452-post-reshuffling.patch
This patch restores all of Solr's build targets from
'Thus terms are represented ...' should be 'Thus fields are represented ...'
-
Key: LUCENE-3288
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3288
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061183#comment-13061183
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-1945:
---
hmmm...I don't remember. I'll take a look again.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061190#comment-13061190
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-2623:
-
There's another bug with core
FST should allow controlling how hard builder tries to share suffixes
-
Key: LUCENE-3289
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3289
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3289:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3289.patch
Initial rough patch showing the idea.
FST should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061195#comment-13061195
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3289:
NOTE: patch applies to 3.x.
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2793:
Attachment: LUCENE-2793_final.patch
I committed the latest patch, merged the branch with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061223#comment-13061223
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2635:
-
How would you expose the args map? The problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned SOLR-2635:
---
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
FieldAnalysisRequestHandler; Expose Filter- Tokenizer-Settings
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-3279.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to trunk in revision 1143766
backported to 3.x in revision
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-3216.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Committed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061230#comment-13061230
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2399:
-
One additional question on the new analysis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061232#comment-13061232
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3233:
-
so i don't forget, lets not waste an arc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-2623:
Attachment: SOLR-2623.patch
Here's a patch which fixes the issue. I've reused
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061238#comment-13061238
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3284:
After looking at the analysis-common
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9390/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 10091 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061240#comment-13061240
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-2638:
--
I'm preparing a mega patch which abstracts out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3233:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3233.patch
New patch, moving the root arcs cache into FST, not
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9392/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterCommit.testCommitThreadSafety
Error Message:
null
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
at
my bad, I committed a fix
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9392/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterCommit.testCommitThreadSafety
Error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061304#comment-13061304
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-433:
Committed to 2.9.4g branch
AttributeSource can have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061310#comment-13061310
]
Thomas Fischer commented on SOLR-1604:
--
Will the complexphrase search works fine with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061313#comment-13061313
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2635:
-
Maybe we can append this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies updated SOLR-2634:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2634.patch
Very small patch that allows nexus deployment.
Publish nightly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies updated SOLR-2634:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2634.patch
Very simple patch that enables deployment, optionally, to nexus.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061323#comment-13061323
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2635:
-
This solution might work, i just don't like it,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061325#comment-13061325
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-2634:
So, if you apply the patch, folks like me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061330#comment-13061330
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2635:
-
Hm yes, correct :/ Then,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061332#comment-13061332
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2392:
-
I think we need to commit the refactoring
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luca Stancapiano updated LUCENE-3167:
-
Attachment: lucene_trunk.patch
I expose this patch:
macrodef name=build-manifest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061341#comment-13061341
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2635:
-
I was already thinking about an extra param to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061342#comment-13061342
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-2634:
---
bq. There is some scheme on the jenkins instance for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061348#comment-13061348
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2399:
-
bq. Does your code also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated SOLR-2634:
--
Affects Version/s: 4.0
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.4
Publish nightly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated SOLR-2634:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2634.patch
bq. So, if you apply the patch, folks like me can trivially deliver
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061389#comment-13061389
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-2634:
---
Benson, I committed your patch to trunk in r1143878
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) updated SOLR-2399:
Attachment: SOLR-2399-110702.patch
Patch based on SVN-Rev {{1143882}},
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061391#comment-13061391
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2878:
-
hey Mike, I applied all your patches
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061392#comment-13061392
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2635:
-
bq. Is this fine?
Yes,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061393#comment-13061393
]
Luca Stancapiano commented on LUCENE-3167:
--
I created an issue on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061395#comment-13061395
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2878:
-
{quote}
For highlighting I think we should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061408#comment-13061408
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-2634:
Thank you.
Publish nightly snapshots,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061420#comment-13061420
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2392:
-
{quote}
I'd like to get this merged in
On Jul 6, 2011, at 6:44 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
In the past I've had to ping the dev list with an include patch XYZ
please message
Yeah... doesn't that strike you as a problem though? Maybe I should dig up all
my issues and start bugging the dev list with Commit this, pretty please?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2392:
Attachment: LUCENE-2392.patch
Attached is a patch, with this CHANGES entry:
{noformat}
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061437#comment-13061437
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-949:
---
It would be easier for a committer to digest this
Yeah, this is kind of a grey area, I think we should do what we can to
encourage contributions and being better about applying patches when
someone has gone through the effort of making one in the first place
certainly goes in the right direction...
It *may* help that there have been several
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, this is kind of a grey area, I think we should do what we can to
encourage contributions and being better about applying patches when
someone has gone through the effort of making one in the first place
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061439#comment-13061439
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2793:
Looks good! +1 to land it!
Error message typo for missing field
Key: SOLR-2640
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2640
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: search
Reporter: Benson Margulies
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies updated SOLR-2640:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2640.patch
Error message typo for missing field
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Smiley, David W. dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
On Jul 6, 2011, at 6:44 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
In the past I've had to ping the dev list with an include patch XYZ
please message
Yeah... doesn't that strike you as a problem though?
Actually I think
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9398/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSpanQueryFilter.testFilterWorks
Error Message:
docIdSet doesn't contain docId 10
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: docIdSet doesn't contain docId 10
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061453#comment-13061453
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3289:
-
I think thats probably good for most cases?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061451#comment-13061451
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2308:
I'm seeing compilation errors
Hi Otis,
I think its most likely the case I broke this when releasing! Sorry!
Not to defer the blame, but I think the confusing aspect of the solr
website wrt releasing is that unlike lucene, solr doesnt have a
separate versioned and unversioned site. So this causes some
difficulties like having
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061456#comment-13061456
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3289:
Yeah I think costly but perfect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated SOLR-2640:
--
Priority: Trivial (was: Major)
Affects Version/s: 4.0
3.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned SOLR-2640:
-
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
Error message typo for missing field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved SOLR-2640.
---
Resolution: Fixed
committed, thanks!
Error message typo for missing field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061467#comment-13061467
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2615:
Yonik, if I instead use a doDebug boolean flag
Please review/commit:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2616Include jdk14 logging
configuration file
~ David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Varun Thacker updated LUCENE-2795:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2795.patch
the open_direct, posix_fadvise function in onlylinux.h remains
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061480#comment-13061480
]
Mike Sokolov commented on LUCENE-2878:
--
bq. what do you mean by sweeping updates?
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3233:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3233.patch
Another rev of the patch: I did a hard bump the FST
: Not to defer the blame, but I think the confusing aspect of the solr
: website wrt releasing is that unlike lucene, solr doesnt have a
: separate versioned and unversioned site. So this causes some
yeah .. at one point we started looking into making this change to be
consistent with ./java,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061512#comment-13061512
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3289:
-
Exactly. This is a very specific use case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061540#comment-13061540
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-2500:
---
On Windows 7 using Oracle JDK 1.6.0_21,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061549#comment-13061549
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-2500:
---
I can get this failure to consistently succeed by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe reopened SOLR-2500:
---
Assignee: Steven Rowe (was: Doron Cohen)
Reopening to address Windows test failure.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061557#comment-13061557
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2500:
---
seems like calling gc() is just masking the problem?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2538.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.4
Assignee: Hoss Man
Erbi: thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061580#comment-13061580
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-2500:
---
bq. seems like calling gc() is just masking the
Auto Facet Selection component
--
Key: SOLR-2641
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2641
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: SearchComponents - other
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher updated SOLR-2641:
---
Attachment: SOLR_2641.patch
Basic implementation of a search component to put after query and before
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061584#comment-13061584
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-2641:
There's loads of room for improvement here, and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061588#comment-13061588
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-2641:
What's needed for this type of thing to do the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2230.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.4
Assignee: Hoss Man
Although
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061595#comment-13061595
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-172:
Already fixed for 2.9.4g
This patch fixes the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-172:
---
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
This patch fixes the unexceptional exceptions ecountered in
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/9415/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 2658 lines...]
[javac]
Hmmm, not sure what i fucked up here...
[javac]
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/checkout/solr/src/solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/CommonsHttpSolrServer.java:328:
method does not override a method from its superclass
[javac]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated SOLR-2331:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2331-fix-windows-file-deletion-failure.patch
I reopened SOLR-2500 because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe resolved SOLR-2500.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Doron Cohen (was: Steven Rowe)
I attached a patch with a fix to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated SOLR-2331:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2331-fix-windows-file-deletion-failure.patch
This version of the patch wraps the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061649#comment-13061649
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-2331:
---
bq. This patch de-anonymizes the FileInputStream and
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
