[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.2-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_102) - Build # 9 - Unstable!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.2-Windows/9/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_102 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 6 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CdcrBootstrapTest.testBootstrapWithContinousIndexingOnSourceCluster Error Message: Captured an uncaught exception in

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9528) Make _docid_ (lucene id) a pseudo field

Alexandre Rafalovitch created SOLR-9528: --- Summary: Make _docid_ (lucene id) a pseudo field Key: SOLR-9528 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9528 Project: Solr Issue Type:

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-6.2-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+134) - Build # 28 - Unstable!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.2-Linux/28/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+134 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCryptoKeys.test Error Message: Could not find collection:.system Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: Could not

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9529) Dates Dynamic Field Inconsistently Defined in Schemas

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15500327#comment-15500327 ] Alexandre Rafalovitch commented on SOLR-9529: - We also have inconsistency with docValues, we

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Windows (32bit/jdk1.8.0_102) - Build # 6123 - Still Unstable!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/6123/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_102 -client -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestSolrCloudWithDelegationTokens.testDelegationTokenCancelFail Error Message: expected:<200> but was:<404> Stack Trace:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.2 - Build # 6 - Still unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.2/6/ 5 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest.test Error Message: Captured an uncaught exception in thread: Thread[id=22586, name=Thread-17491, state=RUNNABLE,

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9529) Dates Dynamic Field Inconsistently Defined in Schemas

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15500265#comment-15500265 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on SOLR-9529: -- GitHub user treygrainger opened a pull request:

[GitHub] lucene-solr pull request #80: SOLR-9529 - Make multivalued dates dynamic fie...

GitHub user treygrainger opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/80 SOLR-9529 - Make multivalued dates dynamic field use dates field type You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9515) Update to Hadoop 3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated SOLR-9515: -- Attachment: SOLR-9515.patch This is almost everything. Main issue left is that a kerberos test is not

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9480) Graph Traversal for Significantly Related Terms (Semantic Knowledge Graph)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Trey Grainger updated SOLR-9480: Attachment: SOLR-9480.patch Initial patch to get the ball rolling here. Feature should now work as

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9529) Dates Dynamic Field Inconsistently Defined in Schemas

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15500294#comment-15500294 ] Trey Grainger commented on SOLR-9529: - Hmm... things were more inconsistent than I thought. There were

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9529) Dates Dynamic Field Inconsistently Defined in Schemas

Trey Grainger created SOLR-9529: --- Summary: Dates Dynamic Field Inconsistently Defined in Schemas Key: SOLR-9529 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9529 Project: Solr Issue Type:

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+134) - Build # 17839 - Unstable!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/17839/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+134 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.search.stats.TestDistribIDF Error Message: 1 thread leaked from SUITE scope at

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 852 - Still Unstable!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/852/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.TestStressCloudBlindAtomicUpdates Error Message: 1 thread leaked from SUITE scope at

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9493) uniqueKey generation fails if content POSTed as "application/javabin" and uniqueKey field comes as NULL (as opposed to not coming at all).

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15498475#comment-15498475 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-9493: -- bq.but just because as you said "ID is very important in SolrCloud", I

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9512) CloudSolrClient's cluster state cache can break direct updates to leaders

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15498485#comment-15498485 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-9512: -- It's just hiding the problem. The fact that there is no leader for

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9512) CloudSolrClient's cluster state cache can break direct updates to leaders

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15498506#comment-15498506 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-9512: -- bq. there is a leader, it's just that we locally have the wrong one

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_102) - Build # 6122 - Still Unstable!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/6122/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_102 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.CdcrVersionReplicationTest Error Message: ObjectTracker found 1 object(s) that were not

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-9523) Refactor CoreAdminOperation into smaller classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Noble Paul resolved SOLR-9523. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 6.3 > Refactor CoreAdminOperation into smaller classes >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9512) CloudSolrClient's cluster state cache can break direct updates to leaders

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15498495#comment-15498495 ] Alan Woodward commented on SOLR-9512: - I don't think so - there *is* a leader, it's just that we

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-9512) CloudSolrClient's cluster state cache can break direct updates to leaders

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alan Woodward updated SOLR-9512: Comment: was deleted (was: I don't think so - there *is* a leader, it's just that we locally have

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9512) CloudSolrClient's cluster state cache can break direct updates to leaders

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15498496#comment-15498496 ] Alan Woodward commented on SOLR-9512: - I don't think so - there *is* a leader, it's just that we

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9524) SolrIndexSearcher.getIndexFingerprint uses dubious sunchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15498410#comment-15498410 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-9524: -- bq. fingerprint =

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9523) Refactor CoreAdminOperation into smaller classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15498456#comment-15498456 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9523: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9523) Refactor CoreAdminOperation into smaller classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15498460#comment-15498460 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9523: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9512) CloudSolrClient's cluster state cache can break direct updates to leaders

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15498631#comment-15498631 ] Alan Woodward commented on SOLR-9512: - (apologies for the terrible metaphor there, it's early on a

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9512) CloudSolrClient's cluster state cache can break direct updates to leaders

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15498629#comment-15498629 ] Alan Woodward commented on SOLR-9512: - It's kicking the can to a live server, though, which will be

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9512) CloudSolrClient's cluster state cache can break direct updates to leaders

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15498680#comment-15498680 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-9512: -- So in your solution here is what happens # Instead of just passing

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7407) Explore switching doc values to an iterator API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-7407: --- Attachment: LUCENE-7407.patch I think this nearly ready! I've fixed all nocommits,

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9524) SolrIndexSearcher.getIndexFingerprint uses dubious sunchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15499113#comment-15499113 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9524: bq. We didn't have any caching till now. So, it is not going to be

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9524) SolrIndexSearcher.getIndexFingerprint uses dubious sunchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15499190#comment-15499190 ] Pushkar Raste commented on SOLR-9524: - I will look through logs of our collections (fortunately we have

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9524) SolrIndexSearcher.getIndexFingerprint uses dubious sunchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15499123#comment-15499123 ] Mike Drob commented on SOLR-9524: - {quote} RE computeIfAbsent and IOException: I recent reviewed some code

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.2.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:59:36.664736] On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 6:15 PM, David Smiley wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:54:37.401807] > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:08 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar > wrote: > >> Please vote for the first release candidate for

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.2-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_102) - Build # 26 - Still unstable!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.2-Linux/26/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_102 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderFailoverAfterPartitionTest.test Error Message: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 851 - Still Unstable!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/851/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch.test Error Message: Expected to find shardAddress in the up shard info:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7407) Explore switching doc values to an iterator API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15499455#comment-15499455 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7407: -- Awesome progress Mike! It's nice to see we don't have to

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9526) data_driven configs defaults to "strings" for unmapped fields, makes most fields containing "textual content" unsearchable, breaks tutorial examples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15499254#comment-15499254 ] Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-9526: I would think that adding docValues to the field would allow