I should add that talks on Mahout, Tika, Nutch, etc. are also encouraged.
-Grant
On May 17, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Lucene Revolution Call For Participation - Boston, Massachusetts October 7
8, 2010
The first US conference dedicated to Apache Lucene and Solr is coming
Hi all
We need to add “Sounds like….” Functionality to our index and I’m looking for
any guidance for where to start.
I read that lucene does not support Soundex directly, but it supports
Dictionary that must be almost the same.
Also found that for Java some people have contributed some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-367.
--
Resolution: Invalid
It must be related with your query. (unbalanced s etc.)
Please use maling lists to ask
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870780#action_12870780
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-358:
Thanks Robert,
I commited your new patch. (both to
Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Bill,
Would you know what the equivalent mingw gcc flag for MSVC's
/implib:foo.lib flag is ?
This overrides the default name and location that the linker uses to
produce a DLLs' import library.
I added some linking tricks on Windows and Linux for
Yes, I think we can remove support for 1.9 indexes as of 3.0:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BackwardsCompatibility
So starting with 3.0 the oldest index we must support are those written by 2.0.
Mike
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'm
But as of 3.0.0 it still supports those indexes :-) So wanna remove in 3.1?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010
Welcome Andrzej! I am glad to have you finally on the Team :-)
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 11:34 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870548#action_12870548
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2455:
Patch looks great! So awesome
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870549#action_12870549
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2455:
bq. Backwards support should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870551#action_12870551
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2272:
Thanks Peter -- this looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870559#action_12870559
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2474:
Should we rename this to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870560#action_12870560
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2471:
I think this issue makes sense,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2471:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.1
4.0
Supporting bulk copies in Directory
On 5/24/10 11:25 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Yes, I think we can remove support for 1.9 indexes as of 3.0:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BackwardsCompatibility
So starting with 3.0 the oldest index we must support are those written by 2.0.
Mike
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:56 AM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870588#action_12870588
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1622:
Here's the dev thread that lead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870605#action_12870605
]
Yuval Feinstein commented on LUCENE-2091:
-
@Vinay - I have this suggestion. I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-2286:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.1
according to CHANGES.txt, this fix is in branch_3x as well.
enable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870624#action_12870624
]
Peter Wolanin commented on SOLR-1852:
-
now this has been in trunk longer, do you feel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870629#action_12870629
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1622:
---
In my opinion, we should also have a very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870633#action_12870633
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1622:
-
{quote}
We'd then need an AutomatonWordQuery -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870688#action_12870688
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2455:
I'm not sure about the live migration, Mike.
So do we want to just remove the 1x indexes from :z and 2x from trunk?
Or do we also want to remove the live migration code? How can one
start with that for example? Are there constants to look for for
example?
Shai
On Monday, May 24, 2010, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/24/10
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870743#action_12870743
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2455:
bq. With that behind us, did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870761#action_12870761
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2455:
I will document it in CHANGES under API section.
Hi Bill,
Would you know what the equivalent mingw gcc flag for MSVC's /implib:foo.lib
flag is ?
This overrides the default name and location that the linker uses to produce
a DLLs' import library.
I added some linking tricks on Windows and Linux for supporting the new
--import
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2458:
Attachment: LUCENE-2458.patch
updated patch that cuts over the remaining two qps: the flexible
On 5/24/10 3:10 PM, karl.wri...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi all,
It seems to me that the “commit” logic in the Solr updateRequestHandler
(or wherever the logic is actually located) conflates two different
semantics. One semantic is what you need to do to make the index process
perform well. The other
Hi Mark,
Unfortunately, indexing performance *is* of concern, otherwise I'd already be
committing on every post.
If your guess is correct, you are basically saying that adding a document to an
index in Solr/Lucene is just as fast as writing that file directly to the disk.
Because, obviously,
Hi Karl,
what are you describing seems to be a good usecase for something like
a message queue where you push a document or record to a queue which
guarantees the queues persistence. I look at this from a little
different perspective, in a distributed environment you would have to
guarantee
Indexing a doc won't be as fast as raw disk IO. But you won't be doing
just raw disk IO to guarantee acceptance. And that will have a cost and
complexity that really makes me wonder if its worth the speed advantage.
For very large documents with complex analyzers...perhaps. But its not
going
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870843#action_12870843
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2413:
-
{quote}
contrib/benchmark's
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
I'm happy to announce that the PMC has accepted Andrzej Bialecki as
Lucene/Solr committer!
Welcome aboard Andrzej,
An enthusiastic jet lagged +1 ;-)
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870846#action_12870846
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2413:
-
By the way, one idea could be to make benchmark
Hi all,
I'm glad to report that I was able to compile Lucene branch_3x with a
recent snapshot of IKVM, and after trying out the Lucene demo apps both
the IndexFiles and SearchFiles applications appear to run flawlessly.
Environment is WinXP/SP2, .Net CLR 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, and IKVM downloaded
from
This is an unresolved old topic.
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org/msg00872.html
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:a...@getopt.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 12:32 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: .Net, Lucene and IKVM
Hi
The reason for this is simple. LCF keeps track of which documents it has
handed off to Solr, and has a fairly involved mechanism for making sure that
every document LCF *thinks* got there, actually does. It even uses a mechanism
akin to a 2-phase commit to make sure that its internal records
Hi,
I'm using the latest nightly build of solr (apache-solr-2010-05-24_08-05-13)
and am repeatedly experiencing a NullPointerException after calling delete,
commit, optimize. Stack trace below. The index is ~20Gb.
I'm not doing Lucene/Solr core development - I just figured this was a better
add caverphone to phoneticfilter
Key: SOLR-1923
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1923
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Schema and Analysis
Affects Versions: 3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-1923:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1923.patch
add caverphone to phoneticfilter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871001#action_12871001
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1870:
--
bq. top level there will be an Iterator of docs, so it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-1870:
-
Attachment: SOLR-1870.patch
fixing JavabinCodec to write collection as array
Binary Update Request
42 matches
Mail list logo
