[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995115#comment-12995115
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-379:
---
I like it better than the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995120#comment-12995120
]
Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-379:
---
I would be happy to move
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Andi Vajda va...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Roman Chyla wrote:
from:
http://realmike.org/blog/2010/07/18/python-extensions-in-cpp-using-swig/
Q. ?Fatal Python error: Interpreter not initialized (version mismatch?)?
A. This error occurs when the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994688#comment-12994688
]
tom liu commented on SOLR-1395:
---
ISolrServer's config is set by katta script. QueryCore's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-1969.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
mmap directory was added in SOLR-2187
Make MMapDirectory configurable in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994700#comment-12994700
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1391:
---
As nobody seems to be interested in or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2920:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.1
Deprecate and remove ShingleMatrixFilter
Deprecate and remove ShingleMatrixFilter
Key: LUCENE-2920
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2920
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2920:
--
Component/s: contrib/analyzers
Deprecate and remove ShingleMatrixFilter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler closed LUCENE-1391.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
See LUCENE-2920.
Token type and flags values get lost when using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994716#comment-12994716
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
Hi David,
Thank you thank you thank you for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2920.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Deprecated 3.x revision: 1070818
Removed trunk revision: 1070821
hi all,
I recently read a paper Pruning Policies for Two-Tiered Inverted
Index with Correctness Guarantee. It's idea is interesting and I
have some questions and like to share with you.
it's idea is pruning unlikely documents for certain terms
e.g.
term1 d1 d3 d6 | d9 d7 d8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994757#comment-12994757
]
JohnWu commented on SOLR-1395:
--
tomliu:
so the solrhome of ISolrServer need configure to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994759#comment-12994759
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-2894:
{quote}
but Solr javadoc on hudson looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994762#comment-12994762
]
Bojan Smid commented on SOLR-2272:
--
Very nice patch Yonik. However, it doesn't apply on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl closed SOLR-2293.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
Use SOLR-2358
SolrCloud distributed indexing
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994766#comment-12994766
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2358:
---
See SOLR-2293 for some thoughts.
Since this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994769#comment-12994769
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2908:
-
Oh, damn :)
On my project, we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994772#comment-12994772
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-756:
--
I think this issue can be closed as it duplicates
Rename the dismax request handler
---
Key: SOLR-2363
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Schema and Analysis
Reporter: Jan
On 2/15/11 11:57 AM, Li Li wrote:
hi all,
I recently read a paper Pruning Policies for Two-Tiered Inverted
Index with Correctness Guarantee. It's idea is interesting and I
have some questions and like to share with you.
Please take a look at LUCENE-1812, LUCENE-2632 and my presentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994774#comment-12994774
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1581:
---
I would agree it relates to SOLR-1240. In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-2348:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
3.2
moving to 3.2
No error reported when using a
Now that we track the code version at the segment level, we can stop tracking
it also in each file level
Key: LUCENE-2921
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994781#comment-12994781
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-1553:
---
I marked this experimental in trunk.
I'll keep the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley resolved SOLR-2363.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
The DismaxRequestHandler and StandardRequestHandler are both deprecated and
+1
2011/2/15 Jan Høydahl (JIRA) j...@apache.org:
Rename the dismax request handler
---
Key: SOLR-2363
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl reopened SOLR-2363:
---
Reopening. This issue is not talking about the old DisMaxRequestHandler but the
example SearchHandler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2363:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2363.patch
This patch renames the example requesthandler to dismaxexample, updates the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2363:
--
Summary: Rename the example dismax request handler instance (was: Rename
the dismax request handler)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994793#comment-12994793
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-2363:
-
ah - my bad.
what about something more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-2351:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.5)
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994795#comment-12994795
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1191:
If someone could whip up a test for this, we could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994797#comment-12994797
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2245:
Thanks Peter,
If we can get someone who knows more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994803#comment-12994803
]
Gunnlaugur Thor Briem commented on SOLR-1191:
-
I'll make one later today or
Since the qt=dismax has specific qt fields, I would suggest we have a
qt=dismax that is plain vanilla, and one that is called qt=dismaxexample
with the fields.
On 2/15/11 7:01 AM, Ryan McKinley (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994817#comment-12994817
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2363:
--
bq: Though i'm not convinced it really needs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994828#comment-12994828
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1581:
---
actually, in looking at this, we don't need
Distributed date faceting now has a patch and is tested:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709
I'm posting to the dev list because I want a committer to mark this for 3.1. I
don't want to assume any of you guys see the comment activity.
~ David
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994837#comment-12994837
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2363:
---
Also we must remember that it's only (supposed to
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Smiley, David W. dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
Distributed date faceting now has a patch and is tested:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709
I’m posting to the dev list because I want a committer to mark this for
3.1. I don’t want to assume any of you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994841#comment-12994841
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2105:
---
5-minute fix candidate for 3.1
Anyone vote for
In the end, I compiled a new python with the necessary modules, and
that works just fine.
But it was an interesting experience. Thank you Andi, your help is always great.
Cheers,
roman
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Roman Chyla roman.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:22 AM,
-- Forwarded message --
From: kenf_nc ken.fos...@realestate.com
Date: Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: Any contribs available for Range field type?
To: solr-u...@lucene.apache.org
I've tried several times to get an active account on
solr-...@lucene.apache.org and the
-- Forwarded message --
From: kenf_nc ken.fos...@realestate.com
Date: Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:49 AM
Subject: Any contribs available for Range field type?
To: solr-u...@lucene.apache.org
I have a huge need for a new field type. It would be a Poly field, similar
to
Point or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994847#comment-12994847
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-2245:
I've been meaning to get back to this, as I have
Can we see more frequent releases? Can we look forward to a 3.2 release
in a few months? Say May 15? That'd be a quarterly release cycle.
(Personally, I'd like to see Robert's improvement to the handling of
Chinese as soon as possible.)
-- DM
On 02/15/2011 10:24 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Tue,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994853#comment-12994853
]
Bill Bell commented on SOLR-1709:
-
1 vote for 3.1
Distributed Date Faceting
3.1 may be too late
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Feb 15, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Peter Sturge (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994847#comment-12994847
]
I would love to see a release every 3 to 6 months too
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Feb 15, 2011, at 8:55 AM, DM Smith dmsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we see more frequent releases? Can we look forward to a 3.2 release in a
few months? Say May 15? That'd be a quarterly release cycle.
Optimize BlockTermsReader.seek
--
Key: LUCENE-2922
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2922
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Reporter: Michael
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2922:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2922.patch
Patch.
Optimize BlockTermsReader.seek
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994865#comment-12994865
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2922:
The opto is a big win for
More contributors contributin' will help us get there!
Release work is not glorious. Release work is not fun (most of it). Release
discussions involve...*cough*...Maven...
Been there. Many hands make light work or something though.
Many want more releases - few have more time to give - that's
On Feb 12, 2011, at 7:38 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) wrote:
I don't want to overstep my role in this conversation (not being a committer
as much as I want to be),
My advice? Purge both of these idea's from your head.
We don't like to talk about this subject around here much, but rebel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994903#comment-12994903
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1711:
bq. What about moving the queue.put() inside the
Mark,
I understand what you are saying. In this case, there are two issues
that are not making it into 3.1 because they landed too late. After the
freeze. The contributions appear to be done. So, the itch at this point
needs to be scratched by one or more committers, to commit the changes
and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994914#comment-12994914
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2105:
---
I like this change.
Can you leave update.processor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2249.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0)
3.1
strictly speaking, this has
On Feb 15, 2011, at 1:00 PM, DM Smith wrote:
Mark,
I understand what you are saying. In this case, there are two issues that are
not making it into 3.1 because they landed too late. After the freeze. The
contributions appear to be done. So, the itch at this point needs to be
scratched by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley reopened SOLR-1711:
Race condition in
org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/StreamingUpdateSolrServer.java
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears to me, that the effort to commit the contributions are minimal,
and that in this case the true cost is that of doing the release.
Heh. I think looks can be deceiving sometimes. I'm not sure I'm willing to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-1711:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1711.patch
Here's a patch that uses offer instead of put in a retry loop.
Race
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-2348:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2348.patch
patch with needed functionality, breaks some tests (most likely tests abusing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-2348:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)
3.1
i'm actively working on this today .. moving back in
On 02/15/2011 02:07 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Mark Millermarkrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears to me, that the effort to commit the contributions are minimal, and
that in this case the true cost is that of doing the release.
Heh. I think looks can be deceiving
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:34 PM, DM Smith dmsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a personal interest in LUCENE-2906. If there is anything I can do to
help it along, I'll be glad to do that. I'll take it up on that issue.
thanks DM, I know I promised to update the patch after solving the
subtask,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-2272:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2272.patch
bq. However, it doesn't apply on current trunk any more.
Here's a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994983#comment-12994983
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-2105:
-
+1
RequestHandler param update.processor is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12994984#comment-12994984
]
Bojan Smid commented on SOLR-2272:
--
Great, thx a lot Yonik :).
Join
solr-dev is the old list; it's now just dev. The old one forwards to the
new list though.
~ David
From: mike anderson [mailto:saidthero...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 10:51 AM
To: solr-...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: ken.fos...@realestate.com
Subject: Fwd: Any contribs available for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-1711.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.4.1)
(was: 1.5)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell updated SOLR-2155:
Attachment: SOLR.2155.p3tests.patch
Test cases for geomultidist() function.
Add this and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-2348:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2348.patch
Updated patch that fixes the test failures.
For the most part, this is fairly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
hao yan updated LUCENE-2903:
Attachment: LUCENE-2903.patch
This new patch provides PForDeltaFixedIntBlockWithIntBufferCodec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
hao yan updated LUCENE-2903:
Attachment: LUCENE-2903.patch
This patch improves the performance of previous PatchedFrameOfRef4 and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
hao yan updated LUCENE-2903:
Attachment: (was: LUCENE_2903.patch)
Improvement of PForDelta Codec
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
hao yan updated LUCENE-2903:
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-2903.patch)
Improvement of PForDelta Codec
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
hao yan updated LUCENE-2903:
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-2903.patch)
Improvement of PForDelta Codec
--
lib dir=.../ directives are logging serious errors when they should not be
--
Key: SOLR-2364
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2364
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995098#comment-12995098
]
Jon Druse commented on LUCENE-1824:
---
Has this had any progress? I'm dealing with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995102#comment-12995102
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-2364:
--
Ah, sorry. I've committed the change.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995103#comment-12995103
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2364:
This seems to have been caused by the following commits on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man reassigned SOLR-2364:
--
Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi (was: Hoss Man)
lib dir=.../ directives are logging serious errors when they
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995105#comment-12995105
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2364:
Koji: thanks.
FWIW: attributing a commit to an issue
: 1. javadocs warnings/errors: this is a constant battle, its worth
: considering if the build should actually fail if you get one of these,
: in my opinion if we can do this we really should. its frustrating to
for a brief period we did, and then we rolled it back...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi resolved SOLR-2364.
--
Resolution: Fixed
The reverts were committed. trunk:1071121, 3x:1071122.
Thanks Hoss for taking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi reassigned LUCENE-1824:
--
Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi
FastVectorHighlighter truncates words at beginning and end
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995125#comment-12995125
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1553:
bq. I'll keep the issue open in 3.1 for a few more days as
I did a similar thing at Kaango.com (classified system). The idea that I
used was to use dynamic fields based on type, and load them into SOLR.
For example,
Autos:
s_auto_make - String
s_auto_model - String
l_auto_year - Long
Real Estate:
l_real_estate_bedrooms - Long
l_read_estate_baths - Long
I'll ask another way
If I use termsIndex. There does not appear to be a way to get a list of
terms for a document and field easily using ValueSource. Is that right?
If not, how would I go about getting a list of terms for a field in a
document? When I do fq=ids:56 it appears to work on
I may have added a test just now, but I and others have been using this
[simple] code for some time now. It has baked, it doesn't need more baking
IMO. If this patch wasn't the biggest reason to not use distributed search (a
key feature) then I wouldn't be here arguing my point. But I've
I noticed that the DIH .jar file ends up in the .war file. It ends up this way
because the DIH's build.xml copies it into a place so that it ultimately winds
up there. This seems like an odd thing because no other contrib module gets
this special treatment. I noticed that the dataimport.jsp
Well, it doesn't really make any sense for dataimport.jsp to be in the WAR file
if DIH isn't there (will it really work being loaded, and friends, by
SolrResourceLoader)?
Erik
On Feb 16, 2011, at 00:57 , Smiley, David W. wrote:
I noticed that the DIH .jar file ends up in the .war
Yes it would be a slight anomaly for this .jsp file (a small text file) to be
there but not the jar file. But that feels like a better trade than this
contrib module being the only contrib module that has it's jar file within
Solr's war.
I don't see what issue there would be regarding
DIH should not be in the Solr war
-
Key: SOLR-2365
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2365
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Build
Reporter: David Smiley
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley updated SOLR-2365:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2365_DIH_should_not_be_in_war.patch
This patch removes the line in the DIH build.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995198#comment-12995198
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-2365:
Since DIH worked out of the box with Solr 1.4.x,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-2881:
--
Attachment: lucene-2881.patch
I fixed a bug in FieldInfos that could lead to wrong field
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
