Am I correct that your trial code changes make this version of Lucene.NET
incompatible and un-buildable with any version of .NET prior to 4.0?
As I understand it, 2.9.4g only replaces non-generic collections with
generic ones. Generics was introduced in .NET Framework 2.0.
Oh, sorry, I took a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-3041:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3041.patch
Updated patch.
This simplifies the hierarchy a lot.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025669#comment-13025669
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3041:
-
Chris, nice simplification. I have one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025677#comment-13025677
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3041:
No, you didn't miss something. The
HyphenationCompoundWordTokenFilter does not work correctly with the german word
Brustamputation
---
Key: LUCENE-3047
URL:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears there are some problems with modularization of the code,
especially between lucene and solr, so I would like for us to have a
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I think this needs a bit more explanation. AIUI, the primary cause for
concern is that by making something a module, you are taking a private,
internal API of Solr's and now making it a public API that must be
Hi Uwe,
Thanks for the reply.
Things are a bit tangled, because I've used early Solr stuff with DocSet and
have extensively used my own caching Filters because I couldn't get what I
wanted with the standard versions a few years ago. It will take a while to undo
that, but I'm working towards
Hi,
In Lucene trunk the Filter gets a ReaderContext which contain a doc base if
available.
For Lucene 2 and 3 this is not available. The Lucene 2.9 code did not change
documented behavior. The fact that Filters always got the top level reader
was never documented (it was just like that in early
Phrase (arbitrary delimiter) based autocomplete
---
Key: SOLR-2479
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2479
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: spellchecker
On Apr 27, 2011, at 12:14 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I think this needs a bit more explanation. AIUI, the primary cause for
concern is that by making something a module, you are taking a private,
internal API of
Thanks Uwe. I'll work towards the CachingWrapperFilter.
Antony
On 27/04/2011 9:33 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
In Lucene trunk the Filter gets a ReaderContext which contain a doc base if
available.
For Lucene 2 and 3 this is not available. The Lucene 2.9 code did not change
documented
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that Simon says things like, everything should be a module and
solr should just be sugar on Lucene. That scares Yonik. Then Yonik makes
comments questioning individual modules. That scares the other
Fixed the behavior in Revision: 1097097
simon
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you're right Simon !
Obviously I didn't test it with that scenario in mind :).
Shai
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com
if its not stated as this feature is going to Lucene
It seems as though some people assume that since Lucene is a library, and Solr
is an application, that exposing Solr API *means* making it part of Lucene. It
ain't necessarily so, and it need not be a point of contention.
I want to
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Why impose namespace restrictions based on where code was originally
committed? I think the namespace of refactored code should reflect
the nature of the code, not its original origins?
And if it's a very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Otto updated SOLR-236:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Am I right that trunk is 4.0? What is the newest patch that works on that
On 4/27/2011 at 9:25 AM, Yonik wrote:
it seems only fair to meet half way and use the solr namespace
for some modules and the lucene namespace for others.
Let's eliminate a source of conflict, and make modules another product that is
neither Lucene nor Solr.
Steve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-2272.
Resolution: Fixed
Join
Key: SOLR-2272
URL:
Improve BooleanQuery rewrite documentation
--
Key: LUCENE-3048
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3048
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Query/Scoring
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-3048:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3048.patch
Patch adding comments as mentioned
Improve BooleanQuery rewrite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-3048:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
Improve BooleanQuery rewrite documentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025819#comment-13025819
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3048:
-
looks useful chris! I will commit it,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-3048.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Improve BooleanQuery rewrite documentation
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Why impose namespace restrictions based on where code was originally
committed? I think the namespace of refactored code should
Sorry, for now, only 4.0.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 6:06 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.NET 2.9.4g -- only usable with .NET 4.0 ?
Digy,
Am I correct that
On 27.04.2011 17:40, Amanuel Workneh wrote:
Am I correct that your trial code changes make this version of Lucene.NET
incompatible and un-buildable with any version of .NET prior to 4.0?
As I understand it, 2.9.4g only replaces non-generic collections with
generic ones. Generics was
NullPointerException in BiSegGraph.getShortPath (in smartcn chinese analyzer)
-
Key: LUCENE-3049
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3049
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Young updated LUCENE-3049:
---
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Patch attached.
NullPointerException
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/7488/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.collation.TestCollationKeyAnalyzer.testThreadSafe
Error Message:
Java heap space
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025927#comment-13025927
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3049:
-
Jonathan, FYI, you didn't attach a patch?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Young resolved LUCENE-3049.
Resolution: Duplicate
Lucene Fields: [New] (was: [Patch Available, New])
Recently
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025929#comment-13025929
]
Jonathan Young edited comment on LUCENE-3049 at 4/27/11 6:17 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Young updated LUCENE-3049:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Patch attached.)
NullPointerException in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025958#comment-13025958
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2400:
-
Yes =) Ty Uwe, applied
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025961#comment-13025961
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3023:
-
I was helping Simon look at reintegrating this
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/7501/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.TestLBHttpSolrServer.testSimple
Error Message:
expected:3 but was:2
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:3 but was:2
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3023:
Attachment: diffMccand.py
ok, i think these issues are resolved. I'm attaching the script Mike
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Why impose namespace restrictions based on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3023:
Attachment: LUCENE-3023.patch
Attached is the DWPT branch in patch format against trunk (for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13026069#comment-13026069
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3023:
-
What about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13024966#comment-13024966
]
Lance Norskog edited comment on SOLR-2242 at 4/28/11 2:01 AM:
--
Hi Phillipe,
Congrats, I am looking forward to start working with you too ;)
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats Phillipe! We are very excited to have you! Your proposal sounds
great.
- Mark
On Apr 26, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Phillipe Ramalho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer updated SOLR-2242:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2242.patch
I noticed that with the original patch applied, SimpleFacetsTest would fail.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-3041:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3041.patch
A much larger patch that implements full query AST walking.
The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13026103#comment-13026103
]
Bill Bell commented on SOLR-2242:
-
Lance Norskog,
What do you want it to be called? I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13026103#comment-13026103
]
Bill Bell edited comment on SOLR-2242 at 4/28/11 3:51 AM:
--
Lance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-3041:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3041.patch
Updated patch which removes the stupid test I'd included
Support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lance Norskog updated SOLR-2242:
Attachment: SOLR-2242.solr3.1.patch
Putting up or shutting up :)
Get distinct count of names for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13026124#comment-13026124
]
Lance Norskog edited comment on SOLR-2242 at 4/28/11 5:33 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13026124#comment-13026124
]
Lance Norskog edited comment on SOLR-2242 at 4/28/11 5:33 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13026129#comment-13026129
]
Lance Norskog commented on LUCENE-3041:
---
This is an excellent opportunity to
52 matches
Mail list logo
