I committed a fix for this in revision 1100103
simon
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> the actual exception we are tripping here is
>
> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.AssertionError
> [junit] at
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestFlushByRamOrCountsPolicy$IndexTh
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/7775/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 472 lines...]
[javac] location: class
org.apache.lucene.analysis.path.TestReversePathHierarchyTokenizer
[javac] ReversePathHierarchyTokenizer t = n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029782#comment-13029782
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3076:
-
good idea robert +1 !!
> add -Dtests.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/7774/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 472 lines...]
[javac] location: class
org.apache.lucene.analysis.path.TestReversePathHierarchyTokenizer
[javac] ReversePathHierarchyTokenizer t = n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2497:
Attachment: SOLR-2497.patch
Huper duper patch that passes all tests!
In general the design of TrieF
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029765#comment-13029765
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-2497:
--
Ah I didn't read the rest of the issue. Fair enough.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/7773/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 472 lines...]
[javac] location: class
org.apache.lucene.analysis.path.TestReversePathHierarchyTokenizer
[javac] ReversePathHierarchyTokenizer t = n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029763#comment-13029763
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2497:
-
Hi Chris,
you are the best! Only your soliution
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/7772/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 472 lines...]
[javac] location: class
org.apache.lucene.analysis.path.TestReversePathHierarchyTokenizer
[javac] ReversePathHierarchyTokenizer t = n
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-3.x/346/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 13314 lines...]
[javac] ^
[javac]
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Solr-3.x/checkout/solr/src/java/org/apache/solr/core/IndexDeletionPolicyWr
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/7771/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 472 lines...]
[javac] location: class
org.apache.lucene.analysis.path.TestReversePathHierarchyTokenizer
[javac] ReversePathHierarchyTokenizer t = n
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/7770/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 472 lines...]
[javac] location: class
org.apache.lucene.analysis.path.TestReversePathHierarchyTokenizer
[javac] ReversePathHierarchyTokenizer t = n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029722#comment-13029722
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-2497:
--
Hey Uwe,
I spent quite some time tracking this down.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/7769/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 488 lines...]
[javac] location: class
org.apache.lucene.analysis.path.TestReversePathHierarchyTokenizer
[javac] ReversePathHierarchyTokenizer t = n
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/7768/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.SolrExampleStreamingTest.testCommitWithin
Error Message:
expected:<0> but was:<1>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<0> but w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley resolved LUCENE-3071.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.2
I had some trouble mergin
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/1553/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNRTThreads.testNRTThreads
Error Message:
GC overhead limit exceeded
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
at
org.apache.lucene.util.Paged
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029657#comment-13029657
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3065:
---
I just add this TODO here:
*Don't forget t
David,
Apologies if this is pedantic, but that should be one of the goals, to move
toward .NET naming conventions (which Lucene.NET does not abide by, and it
makes for an odd fit).
- Nick
-Original Message-
From: David Smith [mailto:dav...@nzcity.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 6:18
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029655#comment-13029655
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3076:
+1 this is great!
This means a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029654#comment-13029654
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1877:
But multiple machines are able t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3051.
Resolution: Fixed
> don't call SegmentInfo.sizeInBytes for the merging segments
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-854.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Create merge policy that doesn't periodically inadvertently optim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2966.
Resolution: Fixed
> SegmentReader.doCommit should be sync'd; norms methods need no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1076.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Shai!
> Allow MergePolicy to select non-contiguous merge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029645#comment-13029645
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3071:
-
this looks great!
> PathHierarchyTokenizer ad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2497:
Attachment: SOLR-2497.patch
Updated patch (some improvements in TrieField converter methods).
Still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3065:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3065.patch
Updated patch with some improvements:
- NumericField now lazy in
>
> I agree in principle, but again, I'll continue to use my own judgment ...
>
This is always good policy!
I was mostly reacting to sending a patch to the mailing list.
ryan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/7762/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.util.TestStringIntern.Monitor file
(/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/checkout/lucene/build/backwards/test/1/junitvmwatcher8452078351423411177.p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated LUCENE-3071:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3071.patch
split into two classes... and two test classes
> PathHierarchyT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029607#comment-13029607
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-3071:
--
bq. You can still have one solr factory, if reverse=
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029599#comment-13029599
]
Greg Tarr commented on LUCENE-1877:
---
Instances of lucene run on machines with the index
the actual exception we are tripping here is
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.AssertionError
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.index.TestFlushByRamOrCountsPolicy$IndexThread.run(TestFlushByRamOrCountsPolicy.java:328)
[junit] Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError
[junit] at
org.a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029540#comment-13029540
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3071:
-
bq. having keeping them together makes one les
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated LUCENE-3071:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3071.patch
updated patch that includes solr factory.
Robert if this looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029533#comment-13029533
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-3071:
---
bq. do you think it would be cleaner if we
+1 - next should be nuked, the issues should simply be plopped into the next
likely release and dealt with (done, moved, pushed) before release.
On May 5, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : > We should definitely kill of "Next" ... i would suggest just removing it,
> : > and not b
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/7757/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.index.TestFlushByRamOrCountsPolicy.testHealthyness
Error Message:
flushingQueue: DWDQ: [ generation: 9 ] currentqueue: DWDQ: [ generation: 10 ]
perThread queue: DWDQ: [
Marge away ;-)
On May 5, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> I suggest we marge "Next" into "3.2" ...
>
> http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/Managing+Versions#ManagingVersions-Mergingmultipleversions
>
>
> ...objections?
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> I suggest we marge "Next" into "3.2" ...
+1
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
: > We should definitely kill of "Next" ... i would suggest just removing it,
: > and not bulk applying a new version (there is no requirement that issues
: > have a version)
...
: Based on that, I think it would be irresponsible to just delete "Next"
: because any issues assigned to t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2918.
Resolution: Fixed
> IndexWriter should prune 100% deleted segs even in the NRT cas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley reassigned LUCENE-3071:
-
Assignee: Ryan McKinley
i'll take a look
> PathHierarchyTokenizer adaptation for urls:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029471#comment-13029471
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3071:
-
Hi Olivier, at a glance the patch looks really
Andrew, you can get to Boilerplate author's email address on
http://code.google.com/p/boilerpipe/
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>From: Andrew Bisson
>To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>Sent: Wed, May 4, 2011
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029444#comment-13029444
]
Olivier Favre edited comment on LUCENE-3071 at 5/5/11 5:19 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Favre updated LUCENE-3071:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3071.patch
I fixed my code accordingly.
Tests run fine now.
Ready to ship?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029435#comment-13029435
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2904:
Earwin, that sounds great (chang
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029433#comment-13029433
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2493:
--
Jan, I don't have any experience with
+1 to Mike's proposal here. Each of these could easily be
patches/issues. The top ones would probably be the basics, eg,
faceting and schemas.
As the easiest short term solution for allowing other systems to use
Solr or it's features, it would be great if a 'committer' responded to
SOLR-1431. E
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029430#comment-13029430
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1877:
Uggh, sorry about that Greg.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029426#comment-13029426
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2493:
---
+1
@Michael, agree on this. But instead of relying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029427#comment-13029427
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3065:
---
Earwin: The long-term plan for flexible in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029421#comment-13029421
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-3065:
-
It's sad NumericFields are hardbaked i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029416#comment-13029416
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3071:
-
bq. Can you help me with the purpose of finalO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029413#comment-13029413
]
Olivier Favre commented on LUCENE-3071:
---
{{ant clean test}} did it for me, thanks!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029412#comment-13029412
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3065 at 5/5/11 4:22 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029412#comment-13029412
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3065:
---
Patch against 3.x.
I moved the to/from by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3065:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: MoreLikeThis problem solved, it was as I said. The test included a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029410#comment-13029410
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3065:
---
Sorry my browser or JIRA deleted wrong com
Sorry, I did not want to delete this one, my huper duper browser gots totally
confused and disturbed...
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029408#comment-13029408
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2904:
-
Ok, I'm wrong. We need both a list of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2497:
Attachment: SOLR-2497.patch
MoreLikeThis problem solved, it was as I said. The test included a TrieI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3065:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: Patch against 3.x.
I moved the to/from byte[] methods from Solr's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3065:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: Ideally this could be done with the schema-like approach of one of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3065:
--
Attachment: (was: SOLR-2497.patch)
> NumericField should be stored in binary format in ind
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3065:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2497.patch
MoreLikeThis problem solved, it was as I said. The test included a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029403#comment-13029403
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2904:
-
I think we should simply change the AP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029393#comment-13029393
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3071:
-
Hi Olivier, thanks for uploading the log.
Th
TestSolrCoreProperties sometimes fails with "no such core: core0"
-
Key: SOLR-2500
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2500
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Favre updated LUCENE-3071:
--
Attachment: ant.log.tar.bz2
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS.
ant -version
Apache Ant version 1.7.
Currently when you assign boosts to multivalue fields during
index-time, they are consolidated, and the individual boosts are lost.
There are some relevant cases where the individual boost values are
important, so I'd like to fix this behaviour.
I've created an issue here, which gives some exampl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Neil Hooey updated SOLR-2499:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: Double-submission, oops!
This issue is the canonical one.)
> Index-time boosts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Neil Hooey updated SOLR-2498:
-
Labels: (was: boost multivalue multivalued)
Description:
I accidentally double-subm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Neil Hooey closed SOLR-2498.
Resolution: Duplicate
> Stop consolidating boosts for values of multivalued fields
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Neil Hooey updated SOLR-2499:
-
Description:
Currently, if you boost a value in a multivalue field during index time, the
boosts are cons
Index-time boosts for multivalue fields are consolidated
Key: SOLR-2499
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2499
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029373#comment-13029373
]
Greg Tarr commented on LUCENE-1877:
---
A previous comment read: "My only worry is current
On May 5, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>>
>> On May 5, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>
>>> 3. Those who think most should be modularized, but realize it's a ton of
>>> work for an unproven gain (although most admi
Stop consolidating boosts for values of multivalued fields
--
Key: SOLR-2498
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2498
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029369#comment-13029369
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3071:
-
bq. But I am having difficulties making the te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Favre updated LUCENE-3071:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3071.patch
Proposed patch attached.
Working against Lucene 3.1 (remove the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029359#comment-13029359
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3076:
---
bq. possibly containing your own set of hu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2904.
Resolution: Fixed
> non-contiguous LogMergePolicy should be careful to not select
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029356#comment-13029356
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-1418:
--
Ok, thanks for your attention Chris. I could
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On May 5, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> 3. Those who think most should be modularized, but realize it's a ton of
>> work for an unproven gain (although most admit it is a highly likely gain)
>> and should be handled on a ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3076:
Attachment: LUCENE-3076.patch
> add -Dtests.codecprovider
> -
>
>
add -Dtests.codecprovider
-
Key: LUCENE-3076
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3076
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Robert Muir
Fix For: 4.0
Currentl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2897.
Resolution: Fixed
> apply delete-by-Term and docID immediately to newly flushed se
On May 5, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> 3. Those who think most should be modularized, but realize it's a ton of
> work for an unproven gain (although most admit it is a highly likely gain)
> and should be handled on a case-by-case basis as people do the work. I
> don't have a
Hi Ryan,
On 5/4/2011 at 7:14 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> As a rule, everything should go through JIRA on its way to svn -- this
> is important so that we have somewhere to point for why we did things.
> Even small things.
Your phrase "As a rule" provides wiggle room that we all use. "Even small
On May 5, 2011, at 4:15 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> Hey folks
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>> Isn't our end goal here a bunch of well factored search modules? Ie,
>> fast forward a year or two and I think we should have modules like
>> these:
>
> I think we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029315#comment-13029315
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2493:
--
bq. Long term, i would love to see the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2458:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2458.patch
This new patch bumps version number to 1.4 and adds examples to the help of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2458:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2458.patch
The solution was simple. Change the commit() method to do ?commit=true inste
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-3068:
Attachment: LUCENE-3068.patch
Patch with more test cases - AND/OR logic for MPQ is combined, and t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029274#comment-13029274
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-3068:
-
Thanks for reviewing Shai!
I'll updated the pa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3073.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.2
Committed revision 1099745, 1
DocValues should be optionally be stored in a PerCodec CFS file to prevent too
many files in the index
--
Key: LUCENE-3075
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
