Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Tommaso Teofili
+1 Tommaso 2011/6/23 Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr33rc0 working release notes here: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote33 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote33 I ran the automated release test script in

RE: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Steven A Rowe
+1 I did the following: - compared the Solr Lucene binary .zip and .tgz archives' contents for any differences (other than line endings) - skimmed Changes.html for generation problems - looked at random pages from each module's javadocs - ran the Lucene demo, indexed and searched - ran the

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-2619) two sfields in geospatial search

2011-06-24 Thread jose rodriguez (JIRA)
two sfields in geospatial search Key: SOLR-2619 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2619 Project: Solr Issue Type: Wish Components: clients - php Affects Versions: 3.2

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2382) DIH Cache Improvements

2011-06-24 Thread Noble Paul (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054263#comment-13054263 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-2382: -- bq.cacheInit() in EntityProcessorBase specifically

[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (SOLR-2382) DIH Cache Improvements

2011-06-24 Thread Noble Paul (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054263#comment-13054263 ] Noble Paul edited comment on SOLR-2382 at 6/24/11 6:42 AM: ---

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Dawid Weiss
I checked the clustering contrib, went through the Solr example (on ubuntu). One thing I noticed: - we have duplicated log4j*.jar in the distribution; the one in clustering contrib is not needed, in fact, because we use slf4j for logging anyway (and this one is picked from the war's WEB-INF/lib.

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-2620) Remove log4j jar from the clustering contrib (uses slf4j).

2011-06-24 Thread Dawid Weiss (JIRA)
Remove log4j jar from the clustering contrib (uses slf4j). -- Key: SOLR-2620 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2620 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Dawid Weiss
Is there a code freeze on 3x or can I apply SOLR-2620 to it? Dawid On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote: I checked the clustering contrib, went through the Solr example (on ubuntu). One thing I noticed: - we have duplicated log4j*.jar in the

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2620) Remove log4j jar from the clustering contrib (uses slf4j).

2011-06-24 Thread Dawid Weiss (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss updated SOLR-2620: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0) Remove log4j jar from the clustering contrib (uses slf4j).

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3229) Overlaped SpanNearQuery

2011-06-24 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054270#comment-13054270 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-3229: -- Try and set 3.4 as fix version for this, 3.3

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir
there is no code freeze anywhere... in my opinion, if you find little things to fix, just commit!!! (and backport also to http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_3/) I named the RC with the revision number, if we decide to go with it anyway, we just use that rev for svn

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Dawid Weiss
Ok, thanks Robert. This is a trivial correction. I didn't find log4j refs. anywhere under contrib/clustering (just to make sure), so I think it won't break anything. Dawid On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: there is no code freeze anywhere... in my opinion, if

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-2620) Remove log4j jar from the clustering contrib (uses slf4j).

2011-06-24 Thread Dawid Weiss (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss resolved SOLR-2620. --- Resolution: Fixed Applied to 3x and 3_3 branches. Remove log4j jar from the clustering contrib

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3206) FST package API refactoring

2011-06-24 Thread Dawid Weiss (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-3206: Fix Version/s: (was: 3.3) 3.4 Moving to 3.4, if at all :) FST package

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 9031 - Failure

2011-06-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9031/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexReaderReopen.testThreadSafety Error Message: Error occurred in thread Thread-95:

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote: +1 I did the following: - compared the Solr Lucene binary .zip and .tgz archives' contents for any differences (other than line endings) - skimmed Changes.html for generation problems - looked at random pages from each

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2617) Support git.

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Trcek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054302#comment-13054302 ] Stefan Trcek commented on SOLR-2617: For .gitignore, I prefer to generate it

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr33rc0 working release notes here: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote33 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote33 Thanks for leading this release Robert. I compared

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 9031 - Failure

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir
i fixed this test, i had inadvertently allowed nightly to give a large multiplier to its 'n', which is not just number of docs, but controls #threads/readers used in this test... thats why its been creating so many open files on hudson lately. On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Apache Jenkins

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2610) Add an option to delete index through CoreAdmin UNLOAD action

2011-06-24 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054316#comment-13054316 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-2610: - bq. But you might want to (in

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2610) Add an option to delete index through CoreAdmin UNLOAD action

2011-06-24 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054320#comment-13054320 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-2610: - {quote} I can think of a

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3234) Provide limit on phrase analysis in FastVectorHighlighter

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054326#comment-13054326 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3234: - Oh I see, I think i'm nervous about

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Andi Vajda
+1 I built PyLucene from the Lucene 3.3 sources, fixed a bug due to FieldComparator becoming generic and all tests passed. Andi.. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3235) TestDoubleBarrelLRUCache hangs under Java 1.5, 3.x and trunk, likely JVM bug

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054336#comment-13054336 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3235: - Mike, i installed 1.5.0_22 (amd64) on my linux

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3230) Make FSDirectory.fsync() public and static

2011-06-24 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054348#comment-13054348 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3230: OK, I think close this issue,

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3235) TestDoubleBarrelLRUCache hangs under Java 1.5, 3.x and trunk, likely JVM bug

2011-06-24 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054349#comment-13054349 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3235: VERY interesting! Is anyone

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3232) Move MutableValues to Common Module

2011-06-24 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054350#comment-13054350 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3232: OK this sounds like a good

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3235) TestDoubleBarrelLRUCache hangs under Java 1.5, 3.x and trunk, likely JVM bug

2011-06-24 Thread Dawid Weiss (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054353#comment-13054353 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3235: - I don't think you can force -client if it's a

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3225) Optimize TermsEnum.seek when caller doesn't need next term

2011-06-24 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3225: --- Attachment: LUCENE-3225.patch OK, new patch: I added a new seekExact method

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3233) HuperDuperSynonymsFilter™

2011-06-24 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3233: --- Attachment: LUCENE-3223.patch Dumping my current state on FSTSynonymFilter -- it

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-2793) Directory createOutput and openInput should take an IOContext

2011-06-24 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2793: --- Attachment: LUCENE-2793-nrt.patch Patch, fixing NRTCachingDir to no longer have

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2793) Directory createOutput and openInput should take an IOContext

2011-06-24 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054359#comment-13054359 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2793: I took quick look @ the branch

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3225) Optimize TermsEnum.seek when caller doesn't need next term

2011-06-24 Thread Dawid Weiss (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054360#comment-13054360 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3225: - I like this one better. boolean args are

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3235) TestDoubleBarrelLRUCache hangs under Java 1.5, 3.x and trunk, likely JVM bug

2011-06-24 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054363#comment-13054363 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3235: Indeed java -client -version

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3235) TestDoubleBarrelLRUCache hangs under Java 1.5, 3.x and trunk, likely JVM bug

2011-06-24 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054362#comment-13054362 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3235: Yes the stack looks just like

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3225) Optimize TermsEnum.seek when caller doesn't need next term

2011-06-24 Thread Simon Willnauer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054364#comment-13054364 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3225: - looks good +1 to commit! thanks for

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3235) TestDoubleBarrelLRUCache hangs under Java 1.5, 3.x and trunk, likely JVM bug

2011-06-24 Thread Dawid Weiss (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054366#comment-13054366 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3235: - I'm same as Robert: +1 to drop 1.5...

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-3230) Make FSDirectory.fsync() public and static

2011-06-24 Thread Shai Erera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-3230. Resolution: Won't Fix I opened LUCENE-3237 to improve how fsync works. After we move sync() to

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3237) FSDirectory.fsync() may not work properly

2011-06-24 Thread Shai Erera (JIRA)
FSDirectory.fsync() may not work properly - Key: LUCENE-3237 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3237 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: core/store

[JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x #161: POMs out of sync

2011-06-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/161/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCheckIndex.testLuceneConstantVersion Error Message: Invalid version: 3.3-SNAPSHOT Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: Invalid version: 3.3-SNAPSHOT at

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3226) rename SegmentInfos.FORMAT_3_1 and improve description in CheckIndex

2011-06-24 Thread Shai Erera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-3226: --- Attachment: LUCENE-3226.patch Patch improves CheckIndex output (includes information about

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3232) Move MutableValues to Common Module

2011-06-24 Thread Chris Male (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054395#comment-13054395 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3232: bq. if we can get FQs factored out soonish This

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3226) rename SegmentInfos.FORMAT_3_1 and improve description in CheckIndex

2011-06-24 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054397#comment-13054397 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3226: Patch looks good -- I like how

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3226) rename SegmentInfos.FORMAT_3_1 and improve description in CheckIndex

2011-06-24 Thread Shai Erera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-3226: --- Attachment: LUCENE-3226.patch Changed the message format a bit (Thanks Robert for the feedback).

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3226) rename SegmentInfos.FORMAT_3_1 and improve description in CheckIndex

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054411#comment-13054411 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3226: - +1 rename SegmentInfos.FORMAT_3_1 and

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2610) Add an option to delete index through CoreAdmin UNLOAD action

2011-06-24 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054415#comment-13054415 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2610: --- bq.I was approaching this particular issue more from

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3226) rename SegmentInfos.FORMAT_3_1 and improve description in CheckIndex

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054413#comment-13054413 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3226: - lets backport this to 3.3? a few issues have

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-2308) Separately specify a field's type

2011-06-24 Thread Nikola Tankovic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nikola Tankovic updated LUCENE-2308: Attachment: LUCENE-2308-3.patch Patch: copied oal.doc to oal.doc2 with new FieldType

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3203) Rate-limit IO used by merging

2011-06-24 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3203: --- Attachment: LUCENE-3203.patch New patch, applies to the IOContext branch. I think

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-2621) Consider adding an option to remove all remnants of a SolrCore when unloading it.

2011-06-24 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
Consider adding an option to remove all remnants of a SolrCore when unloading it. - Key: SOLR-2621 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2621 Project: Solr

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3235) TestDoubleBarrelLRUCache hangs under Java 1.5, 3.x and trunk, likely JVM bug

2011-06-24 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054433#comment-13054433 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3235: - bq. +1 to drop 1.5... +1.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2610) Add an option to delete index through CoreAdmin UNLOAD action

2011-06-24 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054443#comment-13054443 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-2610: - bq. where do you mention how

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-3226) rename SegmentInfos.FORMAT_3_1 and improve description in CheckIndex

2011-06-24 Thread Shai Erera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-3226. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.4 Assignee: Shai Erera Lucene Fields: [New,

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2610) Add an option to delete index through CoreAdmin UNLOAD action

2011-06-24 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054450#comment-13054450 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2610: --- bq. And I got a +1 from you and Jason on the topic

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3238) SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper with Prefix Query issue

2011-06-24 Thread ludovic Boutros (JIRA)
SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper with Prefix Query issue - Key: LUCENE-3238 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3238 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components:

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3238) SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper with Prefix Query issue

2011-06-24 Thread ludovic Boutros (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ludovic Boutros updated LUCENE-3238: Attachment: LUCENE-3238.patch Here is the patch for the branch 3x.

[jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-3238) SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper with Prefix Query issue

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-3238: --- Assignee: Robert Muir SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper with Prefix Query issue

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3238) SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper with Prefix Query issue

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3238: Attachment: LUCENE-3238.patch Hi, definitely a bug, thank you! In my opinion, WildcardQuery

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3238) SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper with Prefix Query issue

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054465#comment-13054465 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3238: --- The fix is fine, but in my optinion the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3238) SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper with Prefix Query issue

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054466#comment-13054466 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3238: --- Patch is fine! Funny overlap, we both

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2618) Indexing and search on more then one type (Mapping)

2011-06-24 Thread Monica Storfjord (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Monica Storfjord updated SOLR-2618: --- Description: It would be very beneficial for a project that I am currently working on to

RE: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
I forgot to mention, all tests of core were running 95 minutes using -Dtests.multiplier=100 and -Dtests.iter=100 ! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir
This might be the cause of the test failures in the skiplist (I will investigate!). In general, not all tests are guaranteed to work correctly with tests.iter 1, some tests have bugs! On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: I forgot to mention, all tests of core

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3238) SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper with Prefix Query issue

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3238: Attachment: LUCENE-3238.patch Same patch: except I made MultiTermQuery's rewrite() final. In my

RE: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
The OpenBitSet test is in all cases serious (vs. the skiplist test is a test bug, that true). The AIOOBE is caused inside OpenBitSet and that should never ever happen, even if you use it incorrectly! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2610) Add an option to delete index through CoreAdmin UNLOAD action

2011-06-24 Thread Shawn Heisey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054489#comment-13054489 ] Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-2610: bq. Shawn, that is not a use-case for RELOAD. The

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: The OpenBitSet test is in all cases serious (vs. the skiplist test is a test bug, that true). The AIOOBE is caused inside OpenBitSet and that should never ever happen, even if you use it incorrectly! Its not clear that

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir
Just some more info: i took away the seed and used -Dtests.iter=100 on this test: JAVA5: [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestOpenBitSet [junit] Tests run: 400, Failures: 0, Errors: 23, Time elapsed: 21.793 sec JAVA6: junit-sequential: [junit] Testsuite:

RE: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
I assume the problem is the intrinsic, I will replace by the own hacker's delight impl (like we do everywhere else in OpenBitSet, why did we use the platform method here?) and try again Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail:

RE: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
The bug is *not* fixed by replacing Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(word) with BitUtils.nlz(word). So this is really strange. Also happens with -Xbatch. - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Uwe

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir
And -Xint and -client On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: The bug is *not* fixed by replacing Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(word) with BitUtils.nlz(word). So this is really strange. Also happens with -Xbatch. - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63,

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-2308) Separately specify a field's type

2011-06-24 Thread Nikola Tankovic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nikola Tankovic updated LUCENE-2308: Attachment: LUCENE-2308-4.patch Separately specify a field's type

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-2308) Separately specify a field's type

2011-06-24 Thread Nikola Tankovic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nikola Tankovic updated LUCENE-2308: Attachment: LUCENE-2308-4.patch Patch No.4: Passing TestDemo Unit test Separately

RE: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
OK, the bug is not a Java 5 bug, its just a different behavior in the BitSet impl between java 5 and java 6. Java 5's BitSet impl allocates for new BitSet(0) always at least one word, so size() differs from OpenBitSet. This makes the test fail. The fix is to code the test correctly by using

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3239) drop java 5 support

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
drop java 5 support - Key: LUCENE-3239 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3239 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task Reporter: Robert Muir its been discussed here and there, but I think we

RE: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
Here the patch to fix the test bug, it's really a test bug - found thanks to Java 5. It was even wrong to use length(), correct would be size() for both and only use the minimum of both as allocation strategy may not be equal. - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Yonik Seeley
I just took a quick peek at the prevBitSet, and the implementation looks buggy (provided that it's legal for a user to pass an i that may be greater than the largest bit ever set). Here is the current code, which will cause an exception when wlen==0. public int prevSetBit(int index) { if

[jira] [Reopened] (LUCENE-3179) OpenBitSet.prevSetBit()

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler reopened LUCENE-3179: --- The testcase for prevSetBit has a bug, that was found by testing with java 5. It assumes that

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3179) OpenBitSet.prevSetBit()

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3179: -- Attachment: TestOpenBitSet.patch OpenBitSet.prevSetBit() ---

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3239) drop java 5 support

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054525#comment-13054525 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3239: --- As said yesterday to you privately: I

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: All that needs to be done is to move the negative index check to the bottom (the first index0 is not needed since we do a signed shift).  public int prevSetBit(int index) {    int i = index6;    if (i = wlen) {

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3238) SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper with Prefix Query issue

2011-06-24 Thread ludovic Boutros (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054530#comment-13054530 ] ludovic Boutros commented on LUCENE-3238: - I understand the patch, that's better

RE: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
Yonik, You are the best. If you look at the test, its also broken somehow, because it uses length vs. size() wrong (I already reopened the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3179 issue). And please stop ranting about Java 5, it helped to find a bug in this impl, its really broken as

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3239) drop java 5 support

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054542#comment-13054542 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3239: - bq. About Hudson testing: We may donate a

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2382) DIH Cache Improvements

2011-06-24 Thread James Dyer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Dyer updated SOLR-2382: - Attachment: SOLR-2382.patch Here is a version that passes parameters via the Context object, rather than

RE: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Yonik, I wrote atestcase that checks how prevSetBit behaves, if I add you patch with optimization. It still had a bug, if the index is beyond last word but not at a multiple of bitsPerWord. The following code is correct: public int prevSetBit(int index) { int i = index 6; final int

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3179) OpenBitSet.prevSetBit()

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3179: -- Attachment: LUCENE-3179-fix.patch Yonik mentioned on mailing list that prevSetBit is broken

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2382) DIH Cache Improvements

2011-06-24 Thread James Dyer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054575#comment-13054575 ] James Dyer commented on SOLR-2382: -- {quote} Why should the DocBuilder be even aware of

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3179) OpenBitSet.prevSetBit()

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054578#comment-13054578 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3179: --- The check for negative indexes must be

Re: [VOTE] release 3.3

2011-06-24 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: Hi Yonik, I wrote atestcase that checks how prevSetBit behaves, if I add you patch with optimization. It still had a bug, if the index is beyond last word but not at a multiple of bitsPerWord. Ahh, right, good catch! You

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3179) OpenBitSet.prevSetBit()

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3179: -- Attachment: LUCENE-3179-fix.patch Modified patch. I moved the assignment to the word variable

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3179) OpenBitSet.prevSetBit()

2011-06-24 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054606#comment-13054606 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-3179: -- The 3179-fix patch looks good to me. I

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3179) OpenBitSet.prevSetBit()

2011-06-24 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054607#comment-13054607 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3179: -- +1, patch looks good Uwe.

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3239) drop java 5 support

2011-06-24 Thread DM Smith (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054621#comment-13054621 ] DM Smith commented on LUCENE-3239: -- Hey, it's me, old-stick-in-the-mud, wrt upgrading

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3239) drop java 5 support

2011-06-24 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054629#comment-13054629 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3239: - That seems reasonable to me - officially we

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2613) DIH Cache backed w/bdb-je

2011-06-24 Thread James Dyer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Dyer updated SOLR-2613: - Attachment: SOLR-2613.patch This version keeps BerkleyBackedCache in sync with the last version from

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2399) Solr Admin Interface, reworked

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Matheis (steffkes) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054634#comment-13054634 ] Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2399: - Young, bq. ..., and I

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2619) two sfields in geospatial search

2011-06-24 Thread David Smiley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054663#comment-13054663 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-2619: I am confused trying to understand this Wish. Is

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-3179) OpenBitSet.prevSetBit()

2011-06-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-3179. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Paul Elschot Committed 3.x branch revision: 1139430

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3228) build should allow you (especially hudson) to refer to a local javadocs installation instead of downloading

2011-06-24 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054679#comment-13054679 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-3228: -- +1 bq. I think we should allow you optionally set a

  1   2   >