[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (LUCENE-1768) NumericRange support for new query parser

2011-08-06 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13080360#comment-13080360 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1768 at 8/6/11 5:57 AM:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 10015 - Failure

2011-08-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/10015/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration.testJmxOnCoreReload Error Message: Number of registered MBeans is not the same as info registry size expected:51 but was:45 Stack Trace:

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3220) Implement various ranking models as Similarities

2011-08-06 Thread David Mark Nemeskey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Mark Nemeskey updated LUCENE-3220: Attachment: LUCENE-3220.patch Done. Actually, I wanted to implement the norm

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3220) Implement various ranking models as Similarities

2011-08-06 Thread David Mark Nemeskey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Mark Nemeskey updated LUCENE-3220: Attachment: LUCENE-3220.patch Added a short explanation on the parameter for the

Re: Question about LUCENE-3097 - Post Group Faceting

2011-08-06 Thread Martijn v Groningen
The facet result for field productType will show the following count: BOOK: 1 DVD: 0 So yes, because of post group faceting you'll miss the second facet. This is basically the same example I described in LUCENE-3097. I've also described three ways of calculating facet counts in combination

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-2308) Separately specify a field's type

2011-08-06 Thread Nikola Tankovic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nikola Tankovic updated LUCENE-2308: Attachment: LUCENE-2308-21.patch 21th patch :) Fixed Javadocs errors. Separately

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3357) Unit and integration test cases for the new Similarities

2011-08-06 Thread David Mark Nemeskey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Mark Nemeskey updated LUCENE-3357: Attachment: LUCENE-3357.patch Integration tests added. There are two of them;

[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (LUCENE-3357) Unit and integration test cases for the new Similarities

2011-08-06 Thread David Mark Nemeskey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13080416#comment-13080416 ] David Mark Nemeskey edited comment on LUCENE-3357 at 8/6/11 3:52 PM:

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-2700) transaction logging

2011-08-06 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
transaction logging --- Key: SOLR-2700 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2700 Project: Solr Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Yonik Seeley A transaction log is needed for durability of updates,

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2700) transaction logging

2011-08-06 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-2700: --- Attachment: SOLR-2700.patch Here's a draft patch. There is a tlog.number file created for each

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 10036 - Failure

2011-08-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/10036/ 2 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.MergeIndexesEmbeddedTest.testMergeIndexesByDirName Error Message: No such core: core1 Stack Trace: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: No such core: core1

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3364) Add score threshold into Scorer.score()

2011-08-06 Thread John Wang (JIRA)
Add score threshold into Scorer.score() --- Key: LUCENE-3364 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3364 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: core/query/scoring

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3364) Add score threshold into Scorer.score()

2011-08-06 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13080437#comment-13080437 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3364: -- Perhaps it would be easiest to just create a

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3364) Add score threshold into Scorer.score()

2011-08-06 Thread John Wang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13080439#comment-13080439 ] John Wang commented on LUCENE-3364: --- Hi Yonik: In Collector, the decision time to

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3364) Add score threshold into Scorer.score()

2011-08-06 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13080442#comment-13080442 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3364: -- Ah, gotcha - I see what you're saying now.

IndexReader.maxDoc() and other

2011-08-06 Thread eks dev
Assuming there are no deletes, would the following work as a way to load *last added document*, surviving optimize as well? Order of documentId-s in Lucene survives optimize as far as I remember? IndexReader ir... int maxDoc = ir.maxDoc() - 1; if(maxDoc0) //? What is the return value on empty

Re: IndexReader.maxDoc() and other

2011-08-06 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:47 PM, eks dev eks...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Assuming there are no deletes,  would the following work as a way to load *last added document*, surviving optimize as well? Order of documentId-s in Lucene survives optimize as far as I remember? No longer... the default merge

Re: IndexReader.maxDoc() and other

2011-08-06 Thread eks dev
Thanks Yonik, assuming I am not going to index ID , than only an option 4. remains so far. I have no other ideas, and Log* merge policy would mean all 4 Indexing magic went to nothing :) Colud then the following do the job? clone DefaultIndexWriterProvider into my codebase (ugly, keep in

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2748) Convert all Lucene web properties to use the ASF CMS

2011-08-06 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13080463#comment-13080463 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2748: - Making some progress on this. Here's

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2748) Convert all Lucene web properties to use the ASF CMS

2011-08-06 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13080471#comment-13080471 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2748: - If you wish to build/test locally, do

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2701) Expose IndexWriter.commit(MapString,String commitUserData) to solr

2011-08-06 Thread Eks Dev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13080474#comment-13080474 ] Eks Dev commented on SOLR-2701: --- one hook for users to update content of this map would be to

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2748) Convert all Lucene web properties to use the ASF CMS

2011-08-06 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13080480#comment-13080480 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2748: -- bq. I'm more or less copying the layout of

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2654) lockType/ not used consistently in all places Directory objects are instantiated

2011-08-06 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13080525#comment-13080525 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2654: --- Hmmm...the problem has something to do with this new

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2654) lockType/ not used consistently in all places Directory objects are instantiated

2011-08-06 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13080532#comment-13080532 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2654: --- My initial suspicion is actually that these where

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2654) lockType/ not used consistently in all places Directory objects are instantiated

2011-08-06 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated SOLR-2654: -- Fix Version/s: 4.0 lockType/ not used consistently in all places Directory objects are instantiated