Re: Serializable SpellCheckResponse

I don't think there is a reason -- maybe open a JIRA issue for this. For wicket, i would recommend looking at LoadableDetachableModel this will make the query once for each request and avoid serializing the results On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Gregor Kaczor wrote: > I am using apache wicke

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2565) Prevent IW#close and cut over to IW#commit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13084494#comment-13084494 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2565: --- Checked it real quick before I head out - it's a mis

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2565) Prevent IW#close and cut over to IW#commit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13084487#comment-13084487 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2565: --- Thanks Vadim - I'll look at this tomorrow. > Preven

Serializable SpellCheckResponse

I am using apache wicket and apache solr. In wicket i am passing QueryResponse to several classes which worked fine until I started using SpellChecking. Wicket is serializing objects in order to store them between requests. QueryResponse implements Serializable but SpellCheckResponse which is a

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 238 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/238/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.LargeVolumeBinaryJettyTest.testMultiThreaded Error Message: expected:<500> but was:<400> Stack Trace: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<5

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2667) Finish Solr Admin UI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13084186#comment-13084186 ] Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2667: - Ryan & David, bq. What

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3373) waitForMerges deadlocks if background merge fails

waitForMerges deadlocks if background merge fails - Key: LUCENE-3373 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3373 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: core/ind

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2667) Finish Solr Admin UI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13084166#comment-13084166 ] Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2667: - Mark, bq. shouldn't QUE

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2667) Finish Solr Admin UI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13084152#comment-13084152 ] Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2667: - Hoss, bq. The left nav

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3357) Unit and integration test cases for the new Similarities

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Mark Nemeskey updated LUCENE-3357: Attachment: LUCENE-3357.patch Fixed the omit norms case. > Unit and integration t

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-3220) Implement various ranking models as Similarities

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3220. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: flexscoring branch Thanks David! Awesome work :) > Impl

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3220) Implement various ranking models as Similarities

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13084106#comment-13084106 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3220: - +1, I do think we should consider naming and s

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3357) Unit and integration test cases for the new Similarities

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13084104#comment-13084104 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3357: - {quote} freq: I didn't know about that! Still,

[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (LUCENE-3357) Unit and integration test cases for the new Similarities

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13084096#comment-13084096 ] David Mark Nemeskey edited comment on LUCENE-3357 at 8/12/11 1:11 PM: -

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3220) Implement various ranking models as Similarities

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13084098#comment-13084098 ] David Mark Nemeskey commented on LUCENE-3220: - Robert: Since we use [LUCENE-

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3357) Unit and integration test cases for the new Similarities

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13084096#comment-13084096 ] David Mark Nemeskey commented on LUCENE-3357: - D: good question, I think if F

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3357) Unit and integration test cases for the new Similarities

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13084080#comment-13084080 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3357: - I think the change to D is fine? what about th