On Fri, 4 May 2012, Thomas Koch wrote:
Thanks, Andi - test runs fine now.
I've another small contribution to offer: samples/java/FacetExample.py -
It's a python port of the facet example in java in package
org.apache.lucene.facet.example.simple (actually it's a bit simplified as
the four java
The PyLucene 3.6.0-1 release tracking the recent release of
Apache Lucene 3.6.0 is ready.
A release candidate is available from:
http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
A list of changes in this release can be seen at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268158#comment-13268158
]
Vimlesh Kumar Mishra commented on SOLR-2312:
I also can't reproduce this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268158#comment-13268158
]
Vimlesh Kumar Mishra edited comment on SOLR-2312 at 5/4/12 6:09 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268162#comment-13268162
]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-3430:
James,
I agree that DB is better than
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2426/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermsEnum.testFloorBlocks
Error Message:
expected:FOUND but was:END
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:FOUND but was:END
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
sebastian L. updated LUCENE-3440:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3440_3.6.1-SNAPSHOT.patch
Patch for 3.6.1-SNAPSHOT.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
sebastian L. updated LUCENE-3440:
-
Fix Version/s: 3.6.1
FastVectorHighlighter: IDF-weighted terms for ordered fragments
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4028:
---
Summary: TestTermsEnum.testFloorBlocks fail
Key: LUCENE-4028
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4028
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4029:
---
Summary: TestNorms OOM
Key: LUCENE-4029
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4029
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13752/
8 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestReproduceMessage.testFailureRule
Error Message:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268252#comment-13268252
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3910:
-
If we are going to keep this large file, local
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13753/
8 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestReproduceMessage.testFailureRule
Error Message:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2427/
8 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestReproduceMessage.testFailureRule
Error Message:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13754/
8 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestReproduceMessage.testFailureRule
Error Message:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13755/
8 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestReproduceMessage.testFailureRule
Error Message:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268261#comment-13268261
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4028:
-
I couldn't see any obvious bug in the test,
Mathias H. created SOLR-3435:
Summary: StatsComponent facet parameter should support all
SimpleFacetParameters
Key: SOLR-3435
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3435
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mathias H. updated SOLR-3435:
-
Description:
StatsComponents _stats.facet_ parameter doesn't support SimpleFacetParameters
params like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mathias H. updated SOLR-3435:
-
Description:
StatsComponents _stats.facet_ parameter doesn't support SimpleFacetParameters
params like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mathias H. updated SOLR-3435:
-
Description:
StatsComponents _stats.facet_ parameter doesn't support SimpleFacetParameters
params like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-4027.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.x codec should have its own skipper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mathias H. updated SOLR-3435:
-
Summary: StatsComponents facet parameter should support all
SimpleFacetParameters (was: StatsComponent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mathias H. updated SOLR-3435:
-
Summary: StatsComponents should support all SimpleFacetParameters in its
facet parameter (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268297#comment-13268297
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3910:
bq. If we are going to keep this
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13758/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
Thread threw an uncaught exception, thread: Thread[Lucene Merge Thread #1,6,]
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268305#comment-13268305
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3910:
-
{quote}
I also like Dawid's idea to have a
Hi Robert,
Why do we need that special pattern? To work around unclean src.tgz files, the
build process creates a clean svn export before packaging. This one should
not contain work/temp folders?
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail:
There is a target called package-local-src-tgz -- Packages the
Lucene source from the local working copy
Additionally solr has a similar one, which uses the lucene patternset.
The target generated a totally useless package.
I don't care if the target really works or is perfect, but its useful
Francois Perron created SOLR-3436:
-
Summary: Groups count in distributed grouping is wrong in some case
Key: SOLR-3436
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3436
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268386#comment-13268386
]
david babits commented on SOLR-3434:
Thank you Hoss and Erick for your help.
I trimmed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268391#comment-13268391
]
david babits commented on SOLR-3434:
993!-- uncomment the following to ignore
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/476/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 7769 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268413#comment-13268413
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2510:
-
Chris, before the changes made here, solrj did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268424#comment-13268424
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2510:
--
bq. before the changes made here, solrj did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268420#comment-13268420
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-3434:
--
1 You should not need the dynamic field.
2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268434#comment-13268434
]
James Dyer commented on SOLR-3430:
--
Mikhail,
So far this is a new test and I'm not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268444#comment-13268444
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3830:
-
Why does mappingcharfilter itself cache FST
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268456#comment-13268456
]
david babits commented on SOLR-3434:
Yes, specifying fieldnames works, and worked
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268469#comment-13268469
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3830:
bq. Shouldnt this be done when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3830:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3830.patch
Patch moving the root arc cache creation to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268506#comment-13268506
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3434:
bq. My opinion is: 'trim' should be true by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268557#comment-13268557
]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-3360:
TestThreaded in a patch has the following
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268565#comment-13268565
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2510:
---
The only reason solrj has that dependency
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer updated SOLR-3360:
-
Attachment: SOLR-3360-test.patch
Mikhail,
See SOLR-3360-test.patch. If you agree this covers everything
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13768/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler
Error Message:
ERROR: SolrIndexSearcher opens=74 closes=73
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: ERROR: SolrIndexSearcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer updated SOLR-3430:
-
Attachment: SOLR-3430.patch
this update also contains a fix in testJdbcDataSource, which was not cleaning
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268629#comment-13268629
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4029:
I think we just have to add the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3910:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3910.patch
Trivial patch that adds -Dtests.linedocsfile=XXX to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268642#comment-13268642
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4029:
Likely we'll need to force the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268659#comment-13268659
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3910:
Maybe as a baby step (before we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268672#comment-13268672
]
david babits commented on SOLR-3434:
I don't think skipLinesAfterHeader is needed.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-4028.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Assignee: Michael McCandless
Michael McCandless created LUCENE-4030:
--
Summary: TestDocTermOrds test failure
Key: LUCENE-4030
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4030
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268802#comment-13268802
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4030:
OK looks like this was caused by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-4030.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Assignee: Michael McCandless
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-4029.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Assignee: Michael McCandless
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268825#comment-13268825
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2510:
Ah sorry guys, I went to a lot of effort to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268827#comment-13268827
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2510:
Tests pass so I've moved it into solr-core to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268827#comment-13268827
]
Chris Male edited comment on LUCENE-2510 at 5/5/12 12:48 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268830#comment-13268830
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2510:
---
bq. I don't see why that would hurt OSGI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268841#comment-13268841
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2510:
bq. Shouldn't SolrResourceLoader depend on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dan Brown updated SOLR-1666:
Attachment: SOLR-1666.patch
Attaching patch that checks whether the value is a String[]. If so, add each
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
Dawid:
With the new test runner you created, would it be possible to setup an
annotation that we could use instead to indicate that a test should in fact
be run, and if it fails, include the failure info in the
64 matches
Mail list logo