[jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-4118) FastVectorHighlighter fail to highlight taking in input some proximity query.

2012-06-10 Thread Koji Sekiguchi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Koji Sekiguchi reassigned LUCENE-4118: -- Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi > FastVectorHighlighter fail to highlight taking in input

Issues with whitespace tokenization in QueryParser

2012-06-10 Thread John Berryman
According to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2605, the Lucene QueryParser tokenizes on white space before giving any text to the Analyzer. This makes it impossible to use multi-term synonyms because the SynonymFilter only receives one word at a time. Resolution to this would really he

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-2605) queryparser parses on whitespace

2012-06-10 Thread John Berryman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292620#comment-13292620 ] John Berryman edited comment on LUCENE-2605 at 6/11/12 2:53 AM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3529) clarify distnction between index & query tables on analysis debug pages

2012-06-10 Thread Erik Hatcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292623#comment-13292623 ] Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-3529: One thought about all those attributes... what abo

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3529) clarify distnction between index & query tables on analysis debug pages

2012-06-10 Thread Erik Hatcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292622#comment-13292622 ] Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-3529: Just some thoughts I have about the analysis page:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2605) queryparser parses on whitespace

2012-06-10 Thread John Berryman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292620#comment-13292620 ] John Berryman commented on LUCENE-2605: --- subscribed - Current client has index full

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows-Java7-64 - Build # 37 - Failure!

2012-06-10 Thread jenkins
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows-Java7-64/37/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.test Error Message: expected:<498> but was:<0> Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<498> but was:<0> at __randomize

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64 - Build # 499 - Failure!

2012-06-10 Thread jenkins
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/499/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTSTTest.testSuggestions Error Message: Exception during query Stack Trace: java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception during query at

RE: SolrJ and Solr on different java versions

2012-06-10 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Shawn, It is correct, the JRE_VERSION_MIGRATION.txt / .html (in trunk/4.0) is about Lucene and Indexing. In fact, the changes in Unicode versions affecting analysis (as this guide describes). SolrJ does not do any analysis, is just passes the String/native types down to solr uon the wire. So

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3284) StreamingUpdateSolrServer swallows exceptions

2012-06-10 Thread Shawn Heisey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292573#comment-13292573 ] Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-3284: Lance, if your idea (or your idea in combination w

Re: SolrJ and Solr on different java versions

2012-06-10 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 6/10/2012 5:59 AM, Robert Muir wrote: There is a text file explaining this: JRE_VERSION_MIGRATION.txt here is a link to the one from the latest nightly build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/javadoc/JRE_VERSION_MIGRATION.html I've seen that already. That tells me that I should n

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-4101) Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED

2012-06-10 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-4101. Resolution: Fixed > Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED > ---

[jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-4128) add safety to preflex segmentinfo "upgrade"

2012-06-10 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-4128: -- Assignee: Michael McCandless > add safety to preflex segmentinfo "upgrade"

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-4128) add safety to preflex segmentinfo "upgrade"

2012-06-10 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4128: --- Summary: add safety to preflex segmentinfo "upgrade" Key: LUCENE-4128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4128 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4115) JAR resolution/ cleanup should be done automatically for ant clean/ eclipse/ resolve.

2012-06-10 Thread Dawid Weiss (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292545#comment-13292545 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4115: - Hmm... I don't think the use of ivy should sto

Re: svn commit: r1348623 - in /lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x: ./ dev-tools/ lucene/ lucene/analysis/ lucene/analysis/common/ lucene/analysis/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/standard/std31/

2012-06-10 Thread Dawid Weiss
Synchonizer -> Synchronizer? D. On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 6:42 PM, wrote: > Author: simonw > Date: Sun Jun 10 16:42:55 2012 > New Revision: 1348623 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1348623&view=rev > Log: > LUCENE-4116: fix concurrency test for DWPTStallControl > > Modified: >    lucene/

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4127) negative offsets/deltas corrumption

2012-06-10 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292543#comment-13292543 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4127: +1 > negative o

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4127) negative offsets/deltas corrumption

2012-06-10 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4127: Attachment: LUCENE-4127.patch Here's a patch: I think its committable (e.g. so we can get alpha re

Re: Lucene/Solr 4.0-ALPHA

2012-06-10 Thread Jack Krupansky
Maybe beta RC's would fit the same need as additional alpha releases. Maybe a new beta RC every week or two as significant changes accumulate would satisfy user needs. Maybe the real value in having an alpha release is not the release itself (since nightly builds are readily available) but to

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4116) Jenkins failure: control claims no stalled threads but waiter seems to be blocked

2012-06-10 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292540#comment-13292540 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4116: --- Thanks! > Jenkins failure

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-4116) Jenkins failure: control claims no stalled threads but waiter seems to be blocked

2012-06-10 Thread Simon Willnauer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-4116. - Resolution: Fixed Lucene Fields: New,Patch Available (was: New) committed to tru

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4116) Jenkins failure: control claims no stalled threads but waiter seems to be blocked

2012-06-10 Thread Simon Willnauer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-4116: Attachment: LUCENE-4116.patch this is actually a test bug. I improved the test in this pat

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4116) Jenkins failure: control claims no stalled threads but waiter seems to be blocked

2012-06-10 Thread Simon Willnauer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-4116: Affects Version/s: 5.0 4.0 Fix Version/s: 5.0

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-64 - Build # 233 - Failure!

2012-06-10 Thread jenkins
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-64/233/ 3 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.TestSqlEntityProcessorDeltaPrefixedPk.testDeltaImport_replace_resolvesUnprefixedPk Error Message: Exception during query Stack Trace: java.lang.Ru

Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 4.0-ALPHA

2012-06-10 Thread Robert Muir
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > > So, I would suggest that there be a series of alpha releases (and betas) as > significant bug fixes and improvements accumulate. I won't do this. Someone else can if they want. Releasing is too time-consuming, you dont just press a butto

Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 4.0-ALPHA

2012-06-10 Thread Jack Krupansky
Is the intent that there be only one alpha and one beta, or could there be a series of either if bugs and improvements are significant enough? I reviewed the Solr 4.0 wiki, which sounds as if the intent is for a single alpha and a single beta, but I am wondering if that makes sense given the c

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4127) negative offsets/deltas corrumption

2012-06-10 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4127: Attachment: LUCENE-4127_offsetAtt.patch Here's a patch adding the stateless checks to OffsetAttrib

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java7-64 - Build # 286 - Failure!

2012-06-10 Thread jenkins
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java7-64/286/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.test Error Message: expected:<498> but was:<0> Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<498> but was:<0> at __random

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4127) negative offsets/deltas corrumption

2012-06-10 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292528#comment-13292528 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4127: - +1! i feel like we should be able to eventuall

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4127) negative offsets/deltas corrumption

2012-06-10 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-4127: --- Attachment: LUCENE-4127.patch I think we should also strongly check posIncr coming i

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4101) Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED

2012-06-10 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292526#comment-13292526 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4101: - yeah less words :) but this matters much less

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4101) Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED

2012-06-10 Thread Steven Rowe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292523#comment-13292523 ] Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-4101: - bq. I like TYPE_UNSTORED better than TYPE_NOT_

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4101) Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED

2012-06-10 Thread Chris Male (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292522#comment-13292522 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-4101: The Type doesn't unstore anything though. That

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4101) Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED

2012-06-10 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292521#comment-13292521 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4101: - I like TYPE_UNSTORED better than TYPE_NOT_STOR

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4101) Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED

2012-06-10 Thread Chris Male (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292520#comment-13292520 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-4101: bq. We could, alternatively, not make these TYPE

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux-Java7-64 - Build # 49 - Failure!

2012-06-10 Thread jenkins
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux-Java7-64/49/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.queryparser.flexible.standard.TestNumericQueryParser Error Message: Unparseable date: "1863.06.07 19時48分37秒 CST 37 -0600 1863" Stack Trace: java

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4101) Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED

2012-06-10 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292519#comment-13292519 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4101: Well ... both types are indexed;

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4101) Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED

2012-06-10 Thread Chris Male (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292516#comment-13292516 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-4101: I like that more. Another alternative instead o

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4127) negative offsets/deltas corrumption

2012-06-10 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292513#comment-13292513 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4127: +1 to strongly type offsets.

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4101) Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED

2012-06-10 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292512#comment-13292512 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4101: How about TYPE_NOT_STORED?

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4127) negative offsets/deltas corrumption

2012-06-10 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292510#comment-13292510 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4127: - just my opinion, I tend towards #1 here. I thi

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4127) negative offsets/deltas corrumption

2012-06-10 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4127: Attachment: LUCENE-4127_test.patch Here are some dead-simple tests. > negative of

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-4127) negative offsets/deltas corrumption

2012-06-10 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4127: --- Summary: negative offsets/deltas corrumption Key: LUCENE-4127 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4127 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-3284) StreamingUpdateSolrServer swallows exceptions

2012-06-10 Thread Mike Sokolov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292507#comment-13292507 ] Mike Sokolov edited comment on SOLR-3284 at 6/10/12 12:14 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3284) StreamingUpdateSolrServer swallows exceptions

2012-06-10 Thread Mike Sokolov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292507#comment-13292507 ] Mike Sokolov commented on SOLR-3284: Another approach we have been using in a similar p

Re: SolrJ and Solr on different java versions

2012-06-10 Thread Robert Muir
There is a text file explaining this: JRE_VERSION_MIGRATION.txt here is a link to the one from the latest nightly build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/javadoc/JRE_VERSION_MIGRATION.html On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > Because Java 6 is going EOL, we plan to up

Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 4.0-ALPHA

2012-06-10 Thread Robert Muir
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote: > I ran smokeTestRelease.py on Windows+Cygwin.  Several "***WARNING***: > javadocs want to fail!" messages. these are ok and expected, it means there exist some public/protected classes without javadocs :) we cant totally enforce this yet, un

[JENKINS] Solr-trunk - Build # 1881 - Failure

2012-06-10 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-trunk/1881/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicZkTest.testBasic Error Message: Cannot talk to ZooKeeper - Updates are disabled. Stack Trace: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Cannot talk to ZooKeeper - Updates are disabled.

[jira] [Reopened] (LUCENE-4061) Improvements to DirectoryTaxonomyWriter (synchronization and others)

2012-06-10 Thread Shai Erera (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera reopened LUCENE-4061: TestDirectoryTaxonomyWriter.testConcurrency sometimes fails on mismatch number of categories. This i

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows-Java6-64 - Build # 29 - Failure!

2012-06-10 Thread Shai Erera
Found the bug -- it's a concurrency issue in DirTaxoWriter -- it now supports addCategory being called concurrently, however not all code paths support it well. I'll reopen LUCENE-4061 where these changes were made. The solution shouldn't be too complicated. Sorry for noise Shai On Sat, Jun 9, 2

[JENKINS] Solr-4.x - Build # 6 - Failure

2012-06-10 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-4.x/6/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerTest.testShardAssignmentBigger Error Message: could not find counter for shard:null Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: could not find counter for shard:null at __randomizedtes

SolrJ and Solr on different java versions

2012-06-10 Thread Shawn Heisey
Because Java 6 is going EOL, we plan to upgrade to Java 7 at some point in the next few months. In order to ensure that it goes smoothly, we will only update one index at a time. This means that the SolrJ program will be running on a different Java version than one of the indexes, and the sam

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3312) Break out StorableField from IndexableField

2012-06-10 Thread Chris Male (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292488#comment-13292488 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3312: Yeah StoredDocument should only consist of Stora

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3312) Break out StorableField from IndexableField

2012-06-10 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292486#comment-13292486 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3312: --- I think as we have 2 interfaces, we should