Hi Shawn,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, Shawn Grant wrote:
Hi Andi, I was just wondering if Pylucene is on its usual schedule to release
4-6 weeks after Lucene. I didn't see any discussion of it on the mailing
list or elsewhere. I'm looking forward to 4.0!
Normally, PyLucene is released a few
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vadim Kirilchuk updated SOLR-2141:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2141-test.patch
Hi,
Here is the patch to existing test that will help to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496033#comment-13496033
]
Vadim Kirilchuk edited comment on SOLR-2141 at 11/13/12 8:07 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496033#comment-13496033
]
Vadim Kirilchuk edited comment on SOLR-2141 at 11/13/12 8:15 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496033#comment-13496033
]
Vadim Kirilchuk edited comment on SOLR-2141 at 11/13/12 8:16 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496033#comment-13496033
]
Vadim Kirilchuk edited comment on SOLR-2141 at 11/13/12 8:28 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Woodward resolved SOLR-4022.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed, trunk: 1408646,1408649; branch_4x: 1408655
Allow
Po Rui created SOLR-4071:
Summary: CollectionsHandler.handleCreateAction() doesn't validate
parameter count and type
Key: SOLR-4071
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4071
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Po Rui updated SOLR-4071:
-
Attachment: SOLR-4071.patch
CollectionsHandler.handleCreateAction() doesn't validate parameter count and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496077#comment-13496077
]
Po Rui edited comment on SOLR-4071 at 11/13/12 10:26 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Per Steffensen updated SOLR-4031:
-
Attachment: SOLR-4031.patch
Here is the patch we did. But is sounds like you already did it. Our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Po Rui updated SOLR-4070:
-
Description: parameters doesn't validate. the same collectionName may be
created more than once. check the
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows/1590/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_09 -XX:+UseSerialGC
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.index.TestConcurrentMergeScheduler.testMaxMergeCount
Error Message:
count should be = maxMergeCount (= 3)
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496127#comment-13496127
]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-4555:
---
The TestOr* queries failing were due to
I committed a fix to the Maven configuration: Derby is now a DIH test dependency
On Nov 13, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.org
wrote:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x/153/
9 tests failed.
FAILED:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496137#comment-13496137
]
Eirik Lygre commented on SOLR-3926:
---
So, the patch solves my problem :-), and I'm not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496137#comment-13496137
]
Eirik Lygre edited comment on SOLR-3926 at 11/13/12 12:36 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496143#comment-13496143
]
Markus Jelsma commented on SOLR-4007:
-
Although changes.txt mentions this for trunk,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496145#comment-13496145
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-1306:
--
I'm thinking of committing this this weekend
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496154#comment-13496154
]
Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-4007:
---
Hi Markus. I believe the fix was all right -- maybe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominik Siebel updated SOLR-2141:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2141.b341f5b.patch
NullPointerException when using escapeSql function
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496160#comment-13496160
]
Dominik Siebel commented on SOLR-2141:
--
I just added a path for commit b341f5b (github
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496160#comment-13496160
]
Dominik Siebel edited comment on SOLR-2141 at 11/13/12 12:56 PM:
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/2436/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.6.0_37 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 18997 lines...]
BUILD FAILED
/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/build.xml:62: The following
error occurred while
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/1596/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_09 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 19690 lines...]
BUILD FAILED
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\build.xml:62: The
following
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/2427/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b58 -client -XX:+UseG1GC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 17850 lines...]
[javadoc] Generating Javadoc
[javadoc] Javadoc execution
[javadoc] warning: [options] bootstrap class path
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496183#comment-13496183
]
Markus Jelsma commented on SOLR-4007:
-
David, the fix is alright indeed, it appears i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Per Steffensen updated SOLR-3178:
-
Attachment: SOLR-3173_3178_3382_3428_plus.patch
Updated patch SOLR-3173_3178_3382_3428_plus.patch
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows/1592/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_09 -XX:+UseSerialGC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 19516 lines...]
BUILD FAILED
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows\build.xml:62: The
following error occurred while
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/2437/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_09 -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 19687 lines...]
BUILD FAILED
/mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/build.xml:62: The following
error occurred while
Woops, I forgot to merge this fix back from trunk yesterday ... I just
did now ...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@sd-datasolutions.de wrote:
Build:
Yeah sorry you have to have = 2 (maybe 4) cores in your machine to
reproduce this! (Because ConcurrentMergeScheduler sets default
maxMergeCount/Threads based on this).
I backported the fix ...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Robert Muir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned SOLR-4070:
-
Assignee: Mark Miller
OverSeerCollectionProcessor.createCollection() parameters issue.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-4070:
--
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0)
(was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496227#comment-13496227
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4070:
---
Thanks Po! I can write a test for this.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned SOLR-4069:
-
Assignee: Mark Miller
ShardLeaderElectionContext.rejoinLeaderElection() doesn't clear the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-4069:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0)
(was: 4.0-BETA)
(was:
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-4556:
---
Summary: FuzzyTermsEnum creates tons of objects
Key: LUCENE-4556
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4556
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned SOLR-4071:
-
Assignee: Mark Miller
CollectionsHandler.handleCreateAction() doesn't validate parameter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-4071:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0)
(was: 4.0-BETA)
5.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-3989:
--
Fix Version/s: 5.0
Assignee: Yonik Seeley
RuntimeException thrown by SolrZkClient should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-4556:
Attachment: LUCENE-4556.patch
here is a patch ...scary™
FuzzyTermsEnum
Hi,
I just committed LUCENE-4509 [1] which changes the default
StoredFieldsFormat on trunk (backport to come on branch 4.x in a few
minutes). You should reindex.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4509
--
Adrien
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496241#comment-13496241
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1306:
At first blush, this seems to go in the wrong
Hmmm... does this mean that 4.1 would REQUIRE reindexing?!?! If so, that would
strongly argue for there to be a 4.0.1 release that has both bug fixes and the
incremental feature additions of the 4x branch but DOESN’T require a reindex.
Who made this decision that it was A-OK for 4.1 to require
Thank you!
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:07 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #153: POMs out of sync
I
Hi Jack,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.comwrote:
Hmmm... does this mean that 4.1 would REQUIRE reindexing?
No it doesn't. This is a notice for people who would already use the
(unreleased) Lucene41Codec for some test indexes to tell them that they
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomás Fernández Löbbe updated SOLR-4061:
Attachment: SOLR-4061.patch
Attached proposed solution. The configuration is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496265#comment-13496265
]
Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-4061:
-
Tomas,
Have you given any thought to being able to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-4509.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Thanks Robert for your comments, I replaced
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496270#comment-13496270
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4061:
---
I think most tools that let you upload directories
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved SOLR-3927.
Resolution: Not A Problem
CompressingStoredFieldsFormat is now the default stored fields format,
Thank you for that clarification!
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:10 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Heads-up] Index file format change on trunk
Hi Jack,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/1599/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_09 -XX:+UseG1GC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 20071 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
[echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496289#comment-13496289
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4061:
---
Patch looks good.
CREATE action in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-3854:
--
Fix Version/s: 5.0
this one ready Sami?
SolrCloud does not work with https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-3507:
--
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.1
Refactor parts of solr doing inter node communication to
I committed a fix.
--
Adrien
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496294#comment-13496294
]
Sami Siren commented on SOLR-3854:
--
I was planning to add some tests too, but got
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496295#comment-13496295
]
Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-4052:
-
Maybe taking a zip/tar file? It
I'm working with Lucene 4's DocValues in a Solr app, but using it to store
multiple values encoded into a byte array. Unfortunately, Solr's
DocumentBuilder code passes each value individually to the FieldType calling
createField() for each value, and so the FieldType never sees all the values
for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496304#comment-13496304
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4069:
---
Is that really necessary though? If we are rejoining
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496305#comment-13496305
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4071:
---
This is likely a general issue with most of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496307#comment-13496307
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4066:
---
Looks like this is a dupe of SOLR-3989? And yonik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-4043:
--
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
Summary: Add ability to get success/failure responses from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-4003:
--
Summary: The SolrZKClient clean method should not try and clear zk paths
that start with /zookeeper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496315#comment-13496315
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4556:
I hit this test failure:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-4003:
--
Attachment: SOLR-4003.patch
The SolrZKClient clean method should not try and clear zk paths that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496335#comment-13496335
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on SOLR-4003:
--
[trunk commit] Mark Robert Miller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496338#comment-13496338
]
Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-4061:
-
What do we think about using Flash though to allow this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496349#comment-13496349
]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-4555:
---
OK, the relevant test here is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496352#comment-13496352
]
Ryan Josal commented on SOLR-3866:
--
The use case I (and it appears the author of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496353#comment-13496353
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on SOLR-4003:
--
[branch_4x commit] Mark Robert Miller
Or perhaps someone needs to optimize that repo? (-gc or something?)
It's so damn slow to pick up a couple updates, there is no way it
could have been this slow before without me noticing I think. It's
ridiculous - it may have been slow previously, but I don't think this
slow.
This happens over
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved SOLR-4003.
---
Resolution: Fixed
The SolrZKClient clean method should not try and clear zk paths that start
If the only motivation for adding 'multiValued=flexible' is the response
format, what about just changing the response format version number and
writing the wrapping list based on that?
Allowing multiple values, but behaving like single value fields when only
one value exists would be a *huge*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496370#comment-13496370
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-1306:
--
Well, the use case here is explicitly that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer updated SOLR-4051:
-
Attachment: SOLR-4051.patch
Improved patch with a unit test. I plan on committing this shortly.
Community,
I have an implementation scratch of the subj (with great test coverage,
btw), but before attach it into jira for ages. I want to know your opinion:
- do you think it will be useful and widely adopted by many users?
- do you think it's necessary to provide consistencyatomicity for case
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
If the only motivation for adding 'multiValued=flexible' is the response
format, what about just changing the response format version number and
writing the wrapping list based on that?
The original version of Solr (SOLAR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer resolved SOLR-4051.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: James Dyer
committed.
Trunk: r1408873 / r1408880 (CHANGES.txt)
4x:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer resolved SOLR-1970.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.1
Assignee: James Dyer
Fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer resolved SOLR-2658.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.1
Assignee: James Dyer
Fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496439#comment-13496439
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4556:
What spooks me about this patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496441#comment-13496441
]
James Dyer commented on SOLR-1920:
--
Shawn,
Can you give more detail as to what kind of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer resolved SOLR-2790.
--
Resolution: Invalid
I agree with Chad: DocBuilder does update dataimport.properties at the end of
a
Developers,
I want to discuss few points regarding disjunction form of BooleanQuery
with minShouldMatch constraint. I'm talking about doc-at-time evaluation
only (BooleanScorer2).
Look into conjunction query which has disjunction in one of its' clauses
e.g. +foo +(bar baz …). if disjunction (bar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496496#comment-13496496
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-1306:
---
I'm with yonik on this one - I think we should drop
Hi Mikhail,
I would definitely be interested! Open a JIRA, and let's see what you've come
up with :-)
-Alan
On 13 Nov 2012, at 18:48, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
Community,
I have an implementation scratch of the subj (with great test coverage, btw),
but before attach it into jira for ages.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496531#comment-13496531
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-1920:
In the MySQL database where my data originates,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496533#comment-13496533
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-1920:
Additonal note: At one time I did all document
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496541#comment-13496541
]
James Dyer commented on SOLR-1920:
--
possibly, the fields/values from the last document
Hi,
The Solr web page http://lucene.apache.org/solr/ is not yet updated with the
Solr4.0 features.
I've taken a stab of updating the top-text and the features article with the
most important updates. Please review and comment. I have pushed my changes to
the staging site for you to review:
Adam Hahn created SOLR-4072:
---
Summary: Error message is incorrect for linkconfig in ZkCLI
Key: SOLR-4072
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4072
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496755#comment-13496755
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4040:
Does anyone have step-by-step instructions on how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496777#comment-13496777
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-3963:
Hey Bill,
First off, some specific comments on your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496817#comment-13496817
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4040:
---
This is prob a dupe of the issue around the commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496844#comment-13496844
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-1306:
-
bq. think we should drop the top level config
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/1614/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.6.0_37 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.TestRandomChains.testRandomChains
Error Message:
stage 3: inconsistent endOffset at pos=5: 15 vs 10; token=ޞ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13496912#comment-13496912
]
Trym Møller commented on SOLR-4066:
---
The provided solution of 3989 is fine with me, my
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo