[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java7 - Build # 1412 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java7/1412/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest Error Message: 1 thread leaked from SUITE scope at org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest: 1) Thread[id=2766,

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5098) Broadword bit selection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-5098: - Fix Version/s: 4.5 Broadword bit selection --- Key:

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-5098) Broadword bit selection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-5098. -- Resolution: Fixed Broadword bit selection ---

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5111) Fix WordDelimiterFilter

Adrien Grand created LUCENE-5111: Summary: Fix WordDelimiterFilter Key: LUCENE-5111 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5111 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4997) The splitshard api doesn't call commit on new sub shards

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708301#comment-13708301 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-4997: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4997) The splitshard api doesn't call commit on new sub shards

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708302#comment-13708302 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-4997: --- Commit

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5112) FilteringTokenFilter is double incrementing the position increment in incrementToken

George Rhoten created LUCENE-5112: - Summary: FilteringTokenFilter is double incrementing the position increment in incrementToken Key: LUCENE-5112 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5112

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5112) FilteringTokenFilter is double incrementing the position increment in incrementToken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708324#comment-13708324 ] George Rhoten commented on LUCENE-5112: --- The workaround seems to be to always use

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5112) FilteringTokenFilter is double incrementing the position increment in incrementToken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708334#comment-13708334 ] George Rhoten commented on LUCENE-5112: --- For reference, this issue causes this

FunctionQuery result field in SearchComponent code ?

Hi , I have written my custom Solr 4.3.0 SearchComponent and purpose of this component is to sum the result of FunctionQuery (termfreq) of some term of each doc and them embed the result in final output. This is my query:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5112) FilteringTokenFilter is double incrementing the position increment in incrementToken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708388#comment-13708388 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5112: I think the code is correct: we

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java7 - Build # 4144 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java7/4144/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest Error Message: 1 thread leaked from SUITE scope at org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest: 1) Thread[id=2530,

Re: Lookback and/or time-aware Merge Policy?

Lookback is a good idea: you could at least gather statistics and assess, later, whether good merges had been selected, and maybe play what if games to explore if different merge selections would have resulted in less copying. A time-based MergeScheduler would make sense: e.g., it would allow

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3069) Lucene should have an entirely memory resident term dictionary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708428#comment-13708428 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3069: {quote} Another thing that

Re: Request for Mentor for LUCENE-2562 : Make Luke a Lucene/Solr Module

Hello guys, Indeed, the GWT port is work in progress and far from done. The driving factor here was to be able to later integrate luke into the solr admin as well as have the standalone webapp for non-solr users. There is (was?) a luke stats handler in the solr ui, that printed some stats on the

Re: Request for Mentor for LUCENE-2562 : Make Luke a Lucene/Solr Module

My personal thoughts/preferences/suggestions for Luke: 1. Need a clean Luke Java library – heavily unit-tested. As integrated with Lucene as possible. 2. A simple command line interface – always useful. 3. A Solr plugin handler – based on #1. Good for apps as well as Admin UI. Nice to be able

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-5040) SnapShooter doesn't create a lock as it runs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Noble Paul reassigned SOLR-5040: Assignee: Noble Paul SnapShooter doesn't create a lock as it runs

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5040) SnapShooter doesn't create a lock as it runs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708450#comment-13708450 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-5040: -- multiple snapshots running in parallel should be just

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5040) SnapShooter doesn't create a lock as it runs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708451#comment-13708451 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5040: --- bq. There should be a way to poll and get the status

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3359) SynonymFilterFactory should accept fieldType attribute rather than tokenizerFactory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708459#comment-13708459 ] Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-3359: -- When I opened the ticket, I thought

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3069) Lucene should have an entirely memory resident term dictionary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708465#comment-13708465 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3069: The new code on the branch looks

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708479#comment-13708479 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4845: bq. I guess, there should be an

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708484#comment-13708484 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4845: Mike, will you still commit it to 4.4? I think

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3069) Lucene should have an entirely memory resident term dictionary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708486#comment-13708486 ] Han Jiang commented on LUCENE-3069: --- bq. I think we should assert that the seekCeil

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-3069) Lucene should have an entirely memory resident term dictionary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708486#comment-13708486 ] Han Jiang edited comment on LUCENE-3069 at 7/15/13 2:20 PM:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-3069) Lucene should have an entirely memory resident term dictionary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708486#comment-13708486 ] Han Jiang edited comment on LUCENE-3069 at 7/15/13 2:20 PM:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-3069) Lucene should have an entirely memory resident term dictionary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708486#comment-13708486 ] Han Jiang edited comment on LUCENE-3069 at 7/15/13 2:35 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4894) Add a new update processor factory that will dynamically add fields to the schema if an input document contains unknown fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708515#comment-13708515 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-4894: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4894) Add a new update processor factory that will dynamically add fields to the schema if an input document contains unknown fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708516#comment-13708516 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-4894: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4894) Add a new update processor factory that will dynamically add fields to the schema if an input document contains unknown fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708518#comment-13708518 ] Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-4894: -- bq. Found a copy/paste exception error Thanks Jack,

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4894) Add a new update processor factory that will dynamically add fields to the schema if an input document contains unknown fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708517#comment-13708517 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-4894: --- Commit

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk - Build # 321 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk/321/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest Error Message: 1 thread leaked from SUITE scope at org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest: 1) Thread[id=554,

Re: Request for Mentor for LUCENE-2562 : Make Luke a Lucene/Solr Module

I disagree with this completely. Solr is last priority On Jul 15, 2013 6:14 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote: My personal thoughts/preferences/suggestions for Luke: 1. Need a clean Luke Java library – heavily unit-tested. As integrated with Lucene as possible. 2. A simple

Re: Request for Mentor for LUCENE-2562 : Make Luke a Lucene/Solr Module

On 7/15/2013 9:15 AM, Robert Muir wrote: I disagree with this completely. Solr is last priority I'm on the Solr side of things, with only the tiniest knowledge or interest in hacking on Lucene. Despite that, I have to agree with Robert here. Let's make sure the Luke module is very solid and

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5039) Admin UI displays -1 for term count in multiValued fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708553#comment-13708553 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-5039: Erick, I am looking at CHANGES.txt on trunk and

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4894) Add a new update processor factory that will dynamically add fields to the schema if an input document contains unknown fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708557#comment-13708557 ] Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-4894: Good shoot (into we know what),

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4894) Add a new update processor factory that will dynamically add fields to the schema if an input document contains unknown fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708567#comment-13708567 ] Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-4894: -- bq. Is there a plan to support specifying fieldType

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5112) FilteringTokenFilter is double incrementing the position increment in incrementToken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708568#comment-13708568 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5112: - This can happen if a consumer is not calling

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6 - Build # 1797 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6/1797/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest Error Message: 1 thread leaked from SUITE scope at org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest: 1) Thread[id=2562,

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4894) Add a new update processor factory that will dynamically add fields to the schema if an input document contains unknown fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708577#comment-13708577 ] Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-4894: -- bq. support specifying fieldType alongside

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5112) FilteringTokenFilter is double incrementing the position increment in incrementToken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708580#comment-13708580 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-5112: --- The code is correct. As [~rcmuir] says -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-3069) Lucene should have an entirely memory resident term dictionary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708486#comment-13708486 ] Han Jiang edited comment on LUCENE-3069 at 7/15/13 4:09 PM:

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5113) Allow for packing the pending values of our AppendingLongBuffers

Adrien Grand created LUCENE-5113: Summary: Allow for packing the pending values of our AppendingLongBuffers Key: LUCENE-5113 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5113 Project: Lucene -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3076) Solr(Cloud) should support block joins

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708597#comment-13708597 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3076: It seems like the implementation of

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708618#comment-13708618 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4845: bq. Mike, will you still commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5090) SSDVA should detect a mismatch in the SSDVReaderState

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708619#comment-13708619 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5090: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4997) The splitshard api doesn't call commit on new sub shards

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708621#comment-13708621 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-4997: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5090) SSDVA should detect a mismatch in the SSDVReaderState

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708623#comment-13708623 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5090: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4997) The splitshard api doesn't call commit on new sub shards

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708624#comment-13708624 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-4997: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4997) The splitshard api doesn't call commit on new sub shards

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708625#comment-13708625 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-4997: --- Commit

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-5090) SSDVA should detect a mismatch in the SSDVReaderState

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-5090. Resolution: Fixed SSDVA should detect a mismatch in the SSDVReaderState

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5090) SSDVA should detect a mismatch in the SSDVReaderState

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708626#comment-13708626 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5090: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5039) Admin UI displays -1 for term count in multiValued fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708627#comment-13708627 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5039: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4997) The splitshard api doesn't call commit on new sub shards

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708629#comment-13708629 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-4997: - I fixed a bug that I had

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5039) Admin UI displays -1 for term count in multiValued fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708631#comment-13708631 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5039: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5039) Admin UI displays -1 for term count in multiValued fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708634#comment-13708634 ] Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-5039: -- Crap! Whaddya want anyway? It's right above

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5039) Admin UI displays -1 for term count in multiValued fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708635#comment-13708635 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5039: --- Commit

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3069) Lucene should have an entirely memory resident term dictionary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Han Jiang updated LUCENE-3069: -- Attachment: LUCENE-3069.patch Patch according to previous comments. We still somewhat need the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708640#comment-13708640 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-4845: - Commit

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-3069) Lucene should have an entirely memory resident term dictionary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708638#comment-13708638 ] Han Jiang edited comment on LUCENE-3069 at 7/15/13 5:08 PM:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (64bit/ibm-j9-jdk6) - Build # 6501 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/6501/ Java: 64bit/ibm-j9-jdk6 -Xjit:exclude={org/apache/lucene/util/fst/FST.pack(IIF)Lorg/apache/lucene/util/fst/FST;} 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration.testJmxRegistration Error Message: No

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708674#comment-13708674 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-4845: - Commit

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5114) remove boolean useCache param from TermsEnum.seekCeil/Exact

Michael McCandless created LUCENE-5114: -- Summary: remove boolean useCache param from TermsEnum.seekCeil/Exact Key: LUCENE-5114 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5114 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708682#comment-13708682 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-4845: - Commit

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-4845. Resolution: Fixed Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester ---

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java7 - Build # 1413 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java7/1413/ 4 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration.testJmxUpdate Error Message: No mbean found for SolrIndexSearcher Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: No mbean found for SolrIndexSearcher at

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2345) Extend geodist() to support MultiValued lat long field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708751#comment-13708751 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-2345: By the way, geodist() handles a variety of

[JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #387: POMs out of sync

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x/387/ All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 20509 lines...] [mvn] [INFO] - [mvn] [INFO] - [mvn]

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2894) Implement distributed pivot faceting

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708757#comment-13708757 ] Andrew Muldowney commented on SOLR-2894: Im working on this patch again, looking

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4997) The splitshard api doesn't call commit on new sub shards

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708776#comment-13708776 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4997: --- bq. We should have a test which catches such a

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5113) Allow for packing the pending values of our AppendingLongBuffers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708777#comment-13708777 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5113: - +1, the little 8KB pending buffers can really

Re: Request for Mentor for LUCENE-2562 : Make Luke a Lucene/Solr Module

My feeling is that what we need most is what I've been working on (surprise, surprise :) ) We need a simple Java app, very similar to the std Luke app. We need it to be Apache licensed all the way through. We need it to be fully integrated as a module. We need it to be straightforward enough

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java7 - Build # 4145 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java7/4145/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.facet.search.TestDrillSideways.testRandom Error Message: the SortedSetDocValuesReaderState provided to this class does not match the reader being searched; you must create a

Re: Request for Mentor for LUCENE-2562 : Make Luke a Lucene/Solr Module

Hi all, The most pressing issue is that I need a mentor for this project by Wednesday, 17th July 2013 if I'm to do it for the ASF-ICFOSS program [1]. Currently I've not found any mentors. Would anyone here please consent to be a mentor for this project so I can include you in my proposal? For

Re: Request for Mentor for LUCENE-2562 : Make Luke a Lucene/Solr Module

Two more questions : 1. How much of the original Luke.java has yet to be modularised? 2. What are the new APIs in Lucene 4.1 and 4.2 that need immediate attention to be updated? On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Ajay Bhat a.ajay.b...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, The most pressing issue is that

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java7 - Build # 4145 - Still Failing

I'll dig. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote: Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java7/4145/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5112) FilteringTokenFilter is double incrementing the position increment in incrementToken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708810#comment-13708810 ] George Rhoten commented on LUCENE-5112: --- Calling clearAttributes() at the start of

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5090) SSDVA should detect a mismatch in the SSDVReaderState

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708823#comment-13708823 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5090: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5090) SSDVA should detect a mismatch in the SSDVReaderState

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708826#comment-13708826 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5090: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5090) SSDVA should detect a mismatch in the SSDVReaderState

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708827#comment-13708827 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5090: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5112) FilteringTokenFilter is double incrementing the position increment in incrementToken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708829#comment-13708829 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-5112: --- bq. Calling clearAttributes() at the start

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5101) make it easier to plugin different bitset implementations to CachingWrapperFilter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708830#comment-13708830 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-5101: -- I had another look at the recent benchmark

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-5101) make it easier to plugin different bitset implementations to CachingWrapperFilter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708830#comment-13708830 ] Paul Elschot edited comment on LUCENE-5101 at 7/15/13 7:04 PM:

[jira] [Closed] (LUCENE-5112) FilteringTokenFilter is double incrementing the position increment in incrementToken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler closed LUCENE-5112. - FilteringTokenFilter is double incrementing the position increment in incrementToken

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3076) Solr(Cloud) should support block joins

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708856#comment-13708856 ] Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-3076: [~ysee...@gmail.com]it's a ginger cake

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (32bit/jdk1.7.0_25) - Build # 3037 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/3037/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_25 -client -XX:+UseSerialGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.analyzing.AnalyzingInfixSuggesterTest Error Message: Resource in scope SUITE failed to

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (32bit/jdk1.7.0_25) - Build # 3037 - Failure!

I'll fix. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote: Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/3037/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_25 -client -XX:+UseSerialGC 2 tests failed. FAILED:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_25) - Build # 2988 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows/2988/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_25 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.analyzing.AnalyzingInfixSuggesterTest Error Message: Resource in scope SUITE

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4894) Add a new update processor factory that will dynamically add fields to the schema if an input document contains unknown fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708899#comment-13708899 ] Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-4894: [~jkrupan] I'm aiming something different

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-4.x - Build # 315 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-4.x/315/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest Error Message: 1 thread leaked from SUITE scope at org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest: 1) Thread[id=3869,

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708937#comment-13708937 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-4845: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708939#comment-13708939 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-4845: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708934#comment-13708934 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-4845: - Commit

[JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk #909: POMs out of sync

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/909/ All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 20111 lines...] [mvn] [INFO] - [mvn] [INFO] -

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-3633) web UI reports an error if CoreAdminHandler says there are no SolrCores

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Matheis (steffkes) updated SOLR-3633: Attachment: SOLR-3633.patch web UI reports an error if

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk #909: POMs out of sync

I *think* something like this is needed to fix Maven's POMs? Can someone with more Maven experience test this? AnalyzingInfixSuggester added deps to lucene/suggest on misc and analyzers-common, but analyzers-common already seems to be in the POM: Index:

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk #909: POMs out of sync

Mike, That's the right thing for Maven config - not sure why analyzers-common was in there already. I'm running the Maven build now with this fix to make sure. (By the way, the IntelliJ config needs these two deps added as well - I'll take care of it.) Steve On Jul 15, 2013, at 4:59 PM,

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708989#comment-13708989 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-4845: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708987#comment-13708987 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-4845: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4845) Add AnalyzingInfixSuggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708992#comment-13708992 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-4845: - Commit

  1   2   >