Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/1074/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerTest.testOverseerFailure
Error Message:
KeeperErrorCode = NodeExists for /collections/collection1/leaders/shard1
Stack Trace:
Adrian,
Thanks for your answer! You highlighted the point which I completely
missed! Again, I see that noob questions are quite useful.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mikhail,
These new byte[] are done on purpose because the contract on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867676#comment-13867676
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5345:
OK I just fixed it! Thanks for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867681#comment-13867681
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5336:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867682#comment-13867682
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5376:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867688#comment-13867688
]
Manuel Lenormand commented on SOLR-5478:
new patch:
I redesigned it without making
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manuel Lenormand updated SOLR-5478:
---
Attachment: SOLR-5478.patch
Speed-up distributed search with high rows param or deep paging
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867698#comment-13867698
]
Remi Melisson commented on LUCENE-5354:
---
Great, glad to contribute!
In term of
Bernhard Kraft created SOLR-5622:
Summary: Unnecessary method call in hunspell stem filter
Key: SOLR-5622
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5622
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernhard Kraft updated SOLR-5622:
-
Attachment: SOLR-5622.patch
Unnecessary method call in hunspell stem filter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867720#comment-13867720
]
Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-5209:
---
Hello. Just wanted to follow-up if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867762#comment-13867762
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-5209:
--
What is the resolution on this?
+1 to not remove the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867762#comment-13867762
]
Noble Paul edited comment on SOLR-5209 at 1/10/14 12:30 PM:
Benson Margulies created LUCENE-5392:
Summary: Documentation for modified token / analysis pipeline
Key: LUCENE-5392
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5392
Project: Lucene - Core
Hi,
If you are not familiar with information retrieval, I would recommend
getting started with learning about it. For example, this book is
available for free and is really excellent:
http://nlp.stanford.edu/IR-book/. Trust me, you're not wasting time if
you read it.
More specifically to Lucene,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867790#comment-13867790
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5209:
---
This would need to be done in the new zk is truth
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867797#comment-13867797
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-5209:
--
I guess this should not matter because it would not
GitHub user benson-basis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/17
LUCENE-5392: A raft of rewrite.
Some specific writing to correspond to LUCENE-5388. Some cleanup from the
long ago. So busy-body-blue-pencilling.
You can merge this pull request into a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867801#comment-13867801
]
Benson Margulies commented on LUCENE-5392:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867805#comment-13867805
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5209:
---
It's not a bug, the behavior was added explicitly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867810#comment-13867810
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5209:
---
Just a note: The new zk=truth mode is the future.
This has kind of taken a while :) There were a bunch of ugly bugs that have
surfaced and a lot of back porting to do, and the holidays, etc…
Anyway, over the past couple days, I’ve heard grumblings asking where 4.6.1 is…
Well, I have some back ports to finish and I know Simon has said he will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867821#comment-13867821
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-5478:
---
{quote}
I will save the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867824#comment-13867824
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-5392:
---
Thanks for the updates. The code examples
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867832#comment-13867832
]
Victor Yap commented on SOLR-822:
-
An old comment's link has been moved.
Originally:
Adrien and I already looked and I ported some stuff last night. I set
up test runs for 4.6.1 here:
http://builds.flonkings.com/job/Lucene-4.6.1-Linux-Java6-64-test-only/
@mark maybe you can share the issues / commits so people can jump in?
am I right that you will be the RM for 4.6.1?
simon
On
Hi,
on 64 bit JVMs this should pass. Which JVM do you use?
On Jenkins, documentation-lint is automatically disabled, if you use a 32 bit
JVM.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Benson
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867840#comment-13867840
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5209:
---
Of course, if we really need to, we can remove this,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867843#comment-13867843
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5473:
---
Hmm...it says it's at github, but then you put up a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867845#comment-13867845
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5473:
---
Also, what branch is it on?
Make one state.json
There seems to be a fair amount of confusion (some of which I share)
about autosuggest and distributed setups/SolrCloud. So I wanted to
update the Wiki. Before making a total fool of myself, I thought I'd
run what I think I know by folks.
1 In distributed setups, you can get partial suggestions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867853#comment-13867853
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5577:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867852#comment-13867852
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5577:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867864#comment-13867864
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-5529:
---
The format change looks fine to me.
If we want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867865#comment-13867865
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5577:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867869#comment-13867869
]
Manuel Lenormand commented on SOLR-5478:
The problem is that the searcher that I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867869#comment-13867869
]
Manuel Lenormand edited comment on SOLR-5478 at 1/10/14 3:00 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867875#comment-13867875
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-5529:
--
Right, this format looks great to me, it fully
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867877#comment-13867877
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-5529:
---
OK, ill take the issue. Thanks Erick.
Add Support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867876#comment-13867876
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-5478:
---
This is how i do it. I can give you a patch with my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867913#comment-13867913
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5577:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867920#comment-13867920
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5577:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867917#comment-13867917
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5392:
-
I'm running the checks on this patch, it looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867916#comment-13867916
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5577:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867921#comment-13867921
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5392:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-5392.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
Documentation for modified token / analysis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867926#comment-13867926
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5577:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867928#comment-13867928
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-5463:
bq. I think this should work automatically with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867927#comment-13867927
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5577:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867944#comment-13867944
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-5463:
--
Sounds like a plan. I'll check in after
Benson Margulies created SOLR-5623:
--
Summary: Better diagnosis of RuntimeExceptions in analysis
Key: SOLR-5623
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
This is a test i'm familiar with, but the failure is aparently an
assertion in IndexWriter._mergeInit that should probably get some more
eyeballs on it...
(Note: this is apparently 4x as of r1556643)
: Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/8922/
: Java:
FWIW: this seed reproduce for me on 4x...
ant test -Dtestcase=TestDistribDocBasedVersion -Dtests.seed=791402573DC76F3C
-Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=ar_IQ
-Dtests.timezone=Antarctica/Rothera -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII
The test isn't doing anything odd with merges,
I don't think we should add such a method. Doc values are commonly
read from collectors, so why do we need a method that works on top of
a DocIdSetIterator? I'm also curious how specialized implementations
could make this method faster than the default implementation?
--
Adrien
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867992#comment-13867992
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5463:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867994#comment-13867994
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5463:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-5463.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.7
Backported to 4x w/o much complication (a small autoboxing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868049#comment-13868049
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5529:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868054#comment-13868054
]
Ramkumar Aiyengar commented on SOLR-5209:
-
FWIW, newer API actually won't allow you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868062#comment-13868062
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5209:
---
This behavior existed long before hash ranges, so
Github user benson-basis closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/17
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-5529.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Areek!
Add Support for queries to use multiple suggesters (new Suggester
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved SOLR-4969.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.7)
4.6
5.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868082#comment-13868082
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5529:
---
Commit
Adrian,
Please find bulkGet() scratch. It's ugly copy-paste, just reuses ByteRef
that provides 10% gain.
...
bulkGet took:101630 ms
...
get took:114422 ms
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think we should add such a method. Doc values are commonly
the problem is really simpler to solve actually.
Look at the comments in the code, it tells you why it is this way:
// NOTE: we could have one buffer, but various consumers (e.g.
FieldComparatorSource)
// assume they own the bytes after calling this!
That is what we should
I agree with Robert. We should leave cloning BytesRefs to whoever needs
that, and not penalize everyone else who don't need it. I must say I didn't
know I can own those BytesRefs and I clone them whenever I need to. I
think I was bitten by one of the other APIs, so I assumed returned
BytesRefs are
Yeah, i dont think its from newer docvalues-using code like yours shai.
instead the problems i had doing this are historical, because e.g.
fieldcache pointed to large arrays and consumers were lazy about it,
knowing that there reference pointed to bytes that would remain valid
across invocations.
Robert Muir created LUCENE-5393:
---
Summary: remove codec byte[] cloning in BinaryDocValues api
Key: LUCENE-5393
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5393
Project: Lucene - Core
I made an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5393
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, i dont think its from newer docvalues-using code like yours shai.
instead the problems i had doing this are historical, because e.g.
fieldcache
I'll provide a little more context. I'm working on bulk extracting
BinaryDocValues. My initial performance test was with in-memory
binaryDocValues, but I think the end game is actually disk-based
binaryDocValues.
I was able to perform around 1 million docId-BytesRef lookups per-second
with
what are you doing with the data?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll provide a little more context. I'm working on bulk extracting
BinaryDocValues. My initial performance test was with in-memory
binaryDocValues, but I think the end game is actually
GitHub user benson-basis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/18
SOLR-5623: set up failing test.
Not all done, but shows failure mode.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868265#comment-13868265
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-5623:
[~hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Bulk extracting full unsorted result sets from Solr. You give Solr a query
and it dumps the full result in a single call. The result set streaming is
in place, but throughput is not as good as I would like it.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Robert
For the test I ran, I just timed the number of docId-bytesRef lookups I
could do in a second.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you sure its not the wire serialization etc causing the bottleneck
(e.g.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868280#comment-13868280
]
David commented on SOLR-5416:
-
Hi Joel,
I'm noticing that QueryResultCache is not being used
Repros for me too ... I'll dig.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
FWIW: this seed reproduce for me on 4x...
ant test -Dtestcase=TestDistribDocBasedVersion -Dtests.seed=791402573DC76F3C
what are you storing in the binaryDV?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote:
For the test I ran, I just timed the number of docId-bytesRef lookups I
could do in a second.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:41 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868310#comment-13868310
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-5416:
--
Actually the reason why I had to disable the
The text value for the field. It's a generic bulk extract tool so whatever
the user loads.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
what are you storing in the binaryDV?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Joel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868323#comment-13868323
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-5623:
bq. How do I make a test that asserts facts about logging?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868325#comment-13868325
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-5623:
OK. Does it make sense to adopt the idea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868342#comment-13868342
]
David commented on SOLR-5416:
-
Is it something that would be easy to re-enable? I'd like to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868345#comment-13868345
]
David commented on SOLR-5416:
-
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5624
David created SOLR-5624:
---
Summary: Enable QueryResultCache for CollapsingQParserPlugin
Key: SOLR-5624
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5624
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Task
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868346#comment-13868346
]
Areek Zillur commented on SOLR-5529:
Thanks for committing this, Robert!
Add Support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868347#comment-13868347
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-5623:
[~rcmuir] The identity of the field we are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868347#comment-13868347
]
Benson Margulies edited comment on SOLR-5623 at 1/10/14 9:46 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868354#comment-13868354
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-5623:
---
Benson I don't know about that, its pretty tricky.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868356#comment-13868356
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-5416:
--
The equals and hashCode methods in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868359#comment-13868359
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-5623:
OK, we can log and return the ID and not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joel Bernstein reassigned SOLR-5624:
Assignee: Joel Bernstein
Enable QueryResultCache for CollapsingQParserPlugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868364#comment-13868364
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-5623:
---
I'm not completely opposed to it for the record, i'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868368#comment-13868368
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-5623:
Here's another ouch.
Doc for Document#get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868374#comment-13868374
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-5623:
Back to the exception decoration problem:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benson Margulies updated SOLR-5623:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Here's another ouch.
Doc for Document#get says:
{code}
/**
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13868400#comment-13868400
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-5623:
I think the patch request is now good to
One of the main motivations behind SOLR-5378 was to support distributed
autosuggest feature. As far as I can tell, there is no nice way of setting
up distributed suggest (not spellcheck) with the spellcheck component.
The way to setup distributed suggest with the new suggest component
(SOLR-5378)
Areek:
Thanks. That's the conclusion I was tending toward, there's no OOB
support for autosuggest across multiple shards currently. Looking
forward to SOLR-5378..
Thanks,
Erick
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Areek Zillur areek...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the main motivations behind SOLR-5378
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
