[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-5746) solr.xml parsing of str vs int vs bool is brittle; fails silently; expects odd type for shareSchema

2014-07-11 Thread Maciej Zasada (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Maciej Zasada updated SOLR-5746: Attachment: SOLR-5746.patch Hi [~hossman], I've attached updated patch file: * used framework's

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6238) Specialized test case for leader recovery scenario

2014-07-11 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058566#comment-14058566 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-6238: - More tests are always welcome.

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-6238) Specialized test case for leader recovery scenario

2014-07-11 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar reassigned SOLR-6238: --- Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar Specialized test case for leader recovery

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6234) Scoring modes for query time join

2014-07-11 Thread Mikhail Khludnev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mikhail Khludnev updated SOLR-6234: --- Description: it adds {{scorejoin}} query parser which calls Lucene's JoinUtil underneath. It

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5815) Add TermAutomatonQuery, for proximity matching that generalizes MultiPhraseQuery/SpanNearQuery

2014-07-11 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
Michael McCandless created LUCENE-5815: -- Summary: Add TermAutomatonQuery, for proximity matching that generalizes MultiPhraseQuery/SpanNearQuery Key: LUCENE-5815 URL:

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5815) Add TermAutomatonQuery, for proximity matching that generalizes MultiPhraseQuery/SpanNearQuery

2014-07-11 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-5815: --- Attachment: LUCENE-5815.patch Patch, work in progress, lots of nocommits... Add

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-6239) HttpSolrServer: connection still allocated

2014-07-11 Thread JIRA
Sergio Fernández created SOLR-6239: -- Summary: HttpSolrServer: connection still allocated Key: SOLR-6239 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6239 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-247) Allow facet.field=* to facet on all fields (without knowing what they are)

2014-07-11 Thread Jack Krupansky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058716#comment-14058716 ] Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-247: - The earlier commentary clearly lays out that the

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6239) HttpSolrServer: connection still allocated

2014-07-11 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058724#comment-14058724 ] Sergio Fernández commented on SOLR-6239: The recommended way, by Httpcomponents

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5815) Add TermAutomatonQuery, for proximity matching that generalizes MultiPhraseQuery/SpanNearQuery

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058730#comment-14058730 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5815: - {quote} (Of course, the index can't store

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5815) Add TermAutomatonQuery, for proximity matching that generalizes MultiPhraseQuery/SpanNearQuery

2014-07-11 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058749#comment-14058749 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5815: bq. Cant we just have a

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5815) Add TermAutomatonQuery, for proximity matching that generalizes MultiPhraseQuery/SpanNearQuery

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058754#comment-14058754 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5815: - {quote} We can only rewrite to BQ of PQ if the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5815) Add TermAutomatonQuery, for proximity matching that generalizes MultiPhraseQuery/SpanNearQuery

2014-07-11 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058755#comment-14058755 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5815: bq. I guess I was immediately

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5816) ToParentBlockJoin deothogonalization

2014-07-11 Thread Nikolay Khitrin (JIRA)
Nikolay Khitrin created LUCENE-5816: --- Summary: ToParentBlockJoin deothogonalization Key: LUCENE-5816 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5816 Project: Lucene - Core Issue

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5816) ToParentBlockJoinQuery deothogonalization

2014-07-11 Thread Nikolay Khitrin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nikolay Khitrin updated LUCENE-5816: Summary: ToParentBlockJoinQuery deothogonalization (was: ToParentBlockJoin

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5816) ToParentBlockJoinQuery deothogonalization

2014-07-11 Thread Nikolay Khitrin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nikolay Khitrin updated LUCENE-5816: Attachment: LUCENE-5816.patch ToParentBlockJoinQuery deothogonalization

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5816) ToParentBlockJoinQuery deothogonalization

2014-07-11 Thread Nikolay Khitrin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nikolay Khitrin updated LUCENE-5816: Description: For now ToParentBlockJoinQuery accepts only child documents. Before

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5816) ToParentBlockJoinQuery deothogonalization

2014-07-11 Thread Nikolay Khitrin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nikolay Khitrin updated LUCENE-5816: Description: For now ToParentBlockJoinQuery accepts only child documents. Before

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6238) Specialized test case for leader recovery scenario

2014-07-11 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058786#comment-14058786 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-6238: --- bq. If the leader lost its connection with ZK then

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5473) Split clusterstate.json per collection and watch states selectively

2014-07-11 Thread Noble Paul (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058817#comment-14058817 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-5473: -- bq.There should at least be an option to listen to

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5817) hunspell buggy zero-affix handling

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-5817: Attachment: LUCENE-5817.patch patch with a simple test hunspell buggy zero-affix handling

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5817) hunspell buggy zero-affix handling

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
Robert Muir created LUCENE-5817: --- Summary: hunspell buggy zero-affix handling Key: LUCENE-5817 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5817 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5816) ToParentBlockJoinQuery deothogonalization

2014-07-11 Thread Nikolay Khitrin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nikolay Khitrin updated LUCENE-5816: Attachment: LUCENE-5816.patch Removed validation test due to removing exception from

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6136) ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer includes a Spin Lock

2014-07-11 Thread Timothy Potter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Timothy Potter updated SOLR-6136: - Attachment: SOLR-6136.patch Here's a patch based largely on Brandon's original patch, using wait

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6136) ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer includes a Spin Lock

2014-07-11 Thread Timothy Potter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058858#comment-14058858 ] Timothy Potter commented on SOLR-6136: -- btw - I decided to not mess with the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5817) hunspell buggy zero-affix handling

2014-07-11 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058867#comment-14058867 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5817: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5817) hunspell buggy zero-affix handling

2014-07-11 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058874#comment-14058874 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5817: - Commit

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-5817) hunspell buggy zero-affix handling

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-5817. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.10 5.0 hunspell buggy zero-affix

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5495) Recovery strategy for leader partitioned from replica case.

2014-07-11 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058879#comment-14058879 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5495: --- I did a quick review of the code and read your

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5473) Split clusterstate.json per collection and watch states selectively

2014-07-11 Thread Ramkumar Aiyengar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058880#comment-14058880 ] Ramkumar Aiyengar commented on SOLR-5473: - Got it. I wouldn't say I am still

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3617) Consider adding start scripts.

2014-07-11 Thread Varun Thacker (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058889#comment-14058889 ] Varun Thacker commented on SOLR-3617: - bq. Also, I've built-in Shawn H's famous GC

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5495) Recovery strategy for leader partitioned from replica case.

2014-07-11 Thread Timothy Potter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1405#comment-1405 ] Timothy Potter commented on SOLR-5495: -- Hi Mark, Awesome, thanks for the review ...

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6136) ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer includes a Spin Lock

2014-07-11 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058910#comment-14058910 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-6136: --- {noformat} -final UpdateRequest

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5818) Fix hunspell zero-string overgeneration

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
Robert Muir created LUCENE-5818: --- Summary: Fix hunspell zero-string overgeneration Key: LUCENE-5818 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5818 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5818) Fix hunspell zero-string overgeneration

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-5818: Attachment: LUCENE-5818.patch Simple patch with some tests. This might be a bug i introduced when

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6136) ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer includes a Spin Lock

2014-07-11 Thread Timothy Potter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058916#comment-14058916 ] Timothy Potter commented on SOLR-6136: -- not sure about that one ... just something I

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-3365) Data import using local time to mark last_index_time

2014-07-11 Thread Shinichiro Abe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shinichiro Abe updated SOLR-3365: - Attachment: SOLR-3365.patch Simple patch for trunk. It would be nice if we could configure time

[JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #656: POMs out of sync

2014-07-11 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x/656/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandlerBackup.org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandlerBackup Error Message: 1 thread leaked from SUITE scope at

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-5818) Fix hunspell zero-string overgeneration

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-5818. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.10 5.0 Fix hunspell zero-string

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5818) Fix hunspell zero-string overgeneration

2014-07-11 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059042#comment-14059042 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-5818: -- For those keeping score at home...

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5473) Split clusterstate.json per collection and watch states selectively

2014-07-11 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059045#comment-14059045 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5473: --- bq. I wouldn't say I am still convinced that caching

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6136) ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer includes a Spin Lock

2014-07-11 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059082#comment-14059082 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-6136: --- Ah, I see, it's a different poll call. I only had

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6203) cast exception while searching with sort function and result grouping

2014-07-11 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059132#comment-14059132 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-6203: I haven't looked into this, but i remember similar issues

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_05) - Build # 10669 - Still Failing!

2014-07-11 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/10669/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_05 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 58917 lines...] BUILD FAILED /mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/build.xml:467: The following error occurred

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6235) SyncSliceTest fails on jenkins with no live servers available error

2014-07-11 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059139#comment-14059139 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-6235: --- Right. I think a minimum, doing nothing is probably

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_05) - Build # 10669 - Still Failing!

2014-07-11 Thread Michael McCandless
Rob fixed. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote: Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/10669/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_05 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC All tests passed

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (64bit/jdk1.7.0_60) - Build # 10788 - Still Failing!

2014-07-11 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/10788/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_60 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 59435 lines...] BUILD FAILED /mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/build.xml:467: The following error

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1705 - Failure!

2014-07-11 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/1705/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 58831 lines...] BUILD FAILED /Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:467: The following error occurred

Core admin merge indexes, should it trigger merge policy?

2014-07-11 Thread Erick Erickson
I think I've become aware of an edge case that I'm wondering is worth a JIRA. Say I have a mergeFactor of 2. Now say I create a bunch of indexes and add them one by one to the running Solr node via merge indexes. The mergeFactor appears to be ignored in this scenario. Indeed, I suspect (without

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3617) Consider adding start scripts.

2014-07-11 Thread Timothy Potter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059346#comment-14059346 ] Timothy Potter commented on SOLR-3617: -- Hi Varun, Thanks for the feedback. Good idea

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6193) using facet.* parameters as local params inside of facet.field causes problems in distributed search

2014-07-11 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man updated SOLR-6193: --- Description: The distributed request logic for faceting (which has to clonemodify requests to individual

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3617) Consider adding start scripts.

2014-07-11 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059389#comment-14059389 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-3617: --- Yeah, a flag for a more friendly dev mode is just as

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6193) using facet.* parameters as local params inside of facet.field causes problems in distributed search

2014-07-11 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059391#comment-14059391 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-6193: The crux of the problem is that the distributed facet

Re: Core admin merge indexes, should it trigger merge policy?

2014-07-11 Thread Mark Miller
I think you would probably want to control the number of segments with the MapReduceIndexerTool before doing the merge initially, and if you find you have too many segments over time as you add more and more data, use a force merge call to reduce the number segments, either manually or

Re: Core admin merge indexes, should it trigger merge policy?

2014-07-11 Thread Erick Erickson
bq: I think you would probably want to control the number of segments with the MapReduceIndexerTool before doing the merge initially This isn't the nub of the issue. Assuming that the number of segments in the index merged in via MRIT is 1 each time, once that index gets merged into the live Solr

[jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-5672) Addindexes does not call maybeMerge

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-5672: --- Assignee: Robert Muir Addindexes does not call maybeMerge

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5672) Addindexes does not call maybeMerge

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059435#comment-14059435 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5672: - I don't agree with this argument about This

Re: Core admin merge indexes, should it trigger merge policy?

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir
You encouraged me to fix it :) On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: bq: I think you would probably want to control the number of segments with the MapReduceIndexerTool before doing the merge initially This isn't the nub of the issue. Assuming that the

Re: Core admin merge indexes, should it trigger merge policy?

2014-07-11 Thread Mark Miller
On July 11, 2014 at 6:10:07 PM, Erick Erickson (erickerick...@gmail.com) wrote: bq: I think you would probably want to control the number of segments with the MapReduceIndexerTool before doing the merge initially This isn't the nub of the issue. The rest of the sentence is required:

Re: Core admin merge indexes, should it trigger merge policy?

2014-07-11 Thread Erick Erickson
Ah, OK. It's late on Friday and I missed that Erick On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: On July 11, 2014 at 6:10:07 PM, Erick Erickson (erickerick...@gmail.com) wrote: bq: I think you would probably want to control the number of segments with

Re: Core admin merge indexes, should it trigger merge policy?

2014-07-11 Thread Erick Erickson
It's been a whole hour, you're slowing down. I promised the original reporter that there would be a JIRA he could track, got one? Erick On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: You encouraged me to fix it :) On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Erick Erickson

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5672) Addindexes does not call maybeMerge

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-5672: Attachment: LUCENE-5672.patch Addindexes does not call maybeMerge

Re: Core admin merge indexes, should it trigger merge policy?

2014-07-11 Thread Chris Hostetter
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5672 : Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:22:40 -0700 : From: Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com : Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org : To: dev@lucene.apache.org : Subject: Re: Core admin merge indexes, should it trigger merge policy? : : It's been a whole

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5672) Addindexes does not call maybeMerge

2014-07-11 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059449#comment-14059449 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-5672: - bq. The user can freely configure this with

Re: Core admin merge indexes, should it trigger merge policy?

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir
Yes, I opened that issue a while ago because i have seen people accidentally create hundreds/thousands of segments (just with lucene api) due to this same trap. This should not happen to you by default. If you want to create hundreds or thousands of segments for your index, it should be because

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5672) Addindexes does not call maybeMerge

2014-07-11 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059455#comment-14059455 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5672: - FYI: this is the third time i've heard of this

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2894) Implement distributed pivot faceting

2014-07-11 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man updated SOLR-2894: --- Attachment: SOLR-2894.patch bq. Quick note on PivotFacetHelper's retrieve method ... I haven't really been

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5672) Addindexes does not call maybeMerge

2014-07-11 Thread Erick Erickson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059530#comment-14059530 ] Erick Erickson commented on LUCENE-5672: Agreed, we _rely_ on segment merging in

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5746) solr.xml parsing of str vs int vs bool is brittle; fails silently; expects odd type for shareSchema

2014-07-11 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059550#comment-14059550 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-5746: Hi Maciej, I glance over the patch a bit more today: 1)

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.7.0) - Build # 1706 - Still Failing!

2014-07-11 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/1706/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexSplitter.test Error Message:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5672) Addindexes does not call maybeMerge

2014-07-11 Thread David Smiley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059621#comment-14059621 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-5672: -- bq. Commit it I say. +1; this is a bug.

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.7.0_60) - Build # 10673 - Failure!

2014-07-11 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/10673/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_60 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestBinaryDocValuesUpdates.testManyReopensAndFields Error Message: MockDirectoryWrapper: cannot close: there are still open