[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392344#comment-14392344
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-6386:
This is hard to think about :)
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/2127/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.ChaosMonkeyNothingIsSafeTest.test
Error Message:
There were too many update fails (38 20) - we expect it can happen, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-6220:
-
Description:
h1.Objective
Most cloud based systems allow to specify rules on how the replicas/nodes of a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392380#comment-14392380
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-6386:
bq. s14 really should have been s13.cfs
You're
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-6388:
Attachment: LUCENE-6388.patch
Optimize SpanNearQuery
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392282#comment-14392282
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-6386:
Right, therefore I still think we consume up to
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.1-Linux/185/
Java: 32bit/ibm-j9-jdk7
-Xjit:exclude={org/apache/lucene/util/fst/FST.pack(IIF)Lorg/apache/lucene/util/fst/FST;}
No tests ran.
Build Log:
[...truncated 161 lines...]
ERROR: Publisher hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitResultArchiver aborted
Robert Muir created LUCENE-6388:
---
Summary: Optimize SpanNearQuery
Key: LUCENE-6388
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6388
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/4627/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_40 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch.test
Error Message:
Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:53417/au_/g/collection1:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/2876/
3 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderInitiatedRecoveryOnCommitTest.test
Error Message:
IOException occured when talking to server at:
http://127.0.0.1:24846/hff/p/c8n_1x3_commits_shard1_replica1
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1439#comment-1439
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6388:
-
{noformat}
Report after iter 10:
Chart saved
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.1-Linux/184/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_80-ea-b05 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrSchemalessExampleTest.testCommitWithinOnDelete
Error Message:
IOException occured when talking
I did not close this door, I agree this is something that should be
considered and tried to list the pros/cons that I could think about.
However I would like it to be dealt with in a different issue as it
will already be a big change to change those 4 queries. Would would be
ok to first make
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Would would be
ok to first make queries immutable up to the boost and then discuss
if/how/when we should go fully immutable with a new API to change
boosts?
+1 ... progress not perfection.
Mike McCandless
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows/4510/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_76 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets.testComplex
Error Message:
mismatch: 'accord'!='a' @
Vectors are totally per-document. Its hard to do anything smarter with
them. Basically by this i mean, IMO vectors aren't going to get better
until the semantics around them improves. From the original
fileformats, i get the impression they were modelled after stored
fields a lot, and I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14393544#comment-14393544
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6352:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley updated SOLR-5855:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Nice work! I'll put some attention on this to try and get it in; not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Areek Zillur updated LUCENE-6339:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 5.x)
5.1
[suggest] Near real time Document
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14393318#comment-14393318
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6386:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14393425#comment-14393425
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6339:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14393453#comment-14393453
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6385:
-
I'm just running checks/tests and plan to
I have committed a fix for this.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14393315#comment-14393315
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6386:
-
Commit
I have committed a fix for this.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.1-Linux/189/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_60-ea-b06 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14393474#comment-14393474
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6339:
-
Commit
Unfortunately, since boost is used in hashCode() and equals() calculations,
changing the boost will still make the queries trappy. You will do all that
work to make everything-but-boost immutable and still not fix the problem.
You can prove it to yourself like so (this test fails!):
public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14393569#comment-14393569
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6352:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley reassigned SOLR-5855:
--
Assignee: David Smiley
Increasing solr highlight performance with caching
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:02 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
They are fundamentally per-document, yes, like stored fields — yes. But I
don’t see how this fundamental constraint prevents the term vector format
from returning a light “Fields” instance which loads
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/12190/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.9.0-ea-b54 -server -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.ChaosMonkeyNothingIsSafeTest.test
Error Message:
There were too many update fails (24 20) - we expect it can happen,
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.1-Linux/189/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_60-ea-b06 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.document.SuggestFieldTest.testSuggestOnAllDeletedDocuments
Error Message:
MockDirectoryWrapper: cannot close:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14393339#comment-14393339
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6386:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-6386.
Resolution: Fixed
TestIndexWriterForceMerge still unreliable in NIGHTLY
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-6385:
---
Assignee: Robert Muir
NullPointerException from Highlighter.getBestFragment()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14393283#comment-14393283
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6385:
-
The fix looks fine. I probably messed this up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14393438#comment-14393438
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6339:
-
Commit
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Reitzel, Charles
charles.reit...@tiaa-cref.org wrote:
Unfortunately, since boost is used in hashCode() and equals() calculations,
changing the boost will still make the queries trappy. You will do all
that work to make everything-but-boost immutable and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-6865:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 5.1)
5.2
Upgrade HttpClient to 4.4.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14393996#comment-14393996
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-6865:
I plan on committing to 5x and trunk tonight. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-6865:
---
Summary: Upgrade HttpClient to 4.4.1 (was: Upgrade HttpClient to 4.4)
Upgrade HttpClient to 4.4.1
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/2879/
4 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedMLTComponentTest.test
Error Message:
Timeout occured while waiting response from server at:
http://127.0.0.1:33912//collection1
Stack Trace:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/12191/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_40 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReqParamsAPI.test
Error Message:
Could not get expected value 'CY val' for path 'params/c' full output: {
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.1-Linux/191/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_40 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.document.SuggestFieldTest.testSuggestOnMostlyFilteredOutDocuments
Error Message:
MockDirectoryWrapper: cannot close:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows/4513/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_76 -client -XX:+UseSerialGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestJsonFacets.testComplex
Error Message:
mismatch: 'accord'!='a' @ facets/makes/buckets/[0]/models/buckets/[1]/val
Stack
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/2880/
4 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest.test
Error Message:
shard1 is not consistent. Got 501 from
http://127.0.0.1:39753/mkrd/collection1lastClient and got 264 from
Mark Miller created SOLR-7344:
-
Summary: Use two thread pools, one for internal requests and one
for external, to avoid distributed deadlock and decrease the number of threads
that need to be created.
Key: SOLR-7344
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-5.x/891/
No tests ran.
Build Log:
[...truncated 25354 lines...]
BUILD FAILED
/usr/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-Maven-5.x/build.xml:545:
The following error occurred while executing this line:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux/12020/
Java: 64bit/ibm-j9-jdk7
-Xjit:exclude={org/apache/lucene/util/fst/FST.pack(IIF)Lorg/apache/lucene/util/fst/FST;}
No tests ran.
Build Log:
[...truncated 304 lines...]
ERROR: Publisher hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitResultArchiver
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-MacOSX/2084/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.doTestIndexAndConfigAliasReplication
Error Message:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/12185/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_40 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC
2 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.ShardSplitTest.test
Error Message:
Timeout occured while waiting response from server at: http://127.0.0.1:45162/fk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14394044#comment-14394044
]
Shai Erera commented on SOLR-7336:
--
[~markrmil...@gmail.com] if you have no objections, I
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/12193/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_40 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.document.SuggestFieldTest.testDupSuggestFieldValues
Error Message:
MockDirectoryWrapper: cannot close: there are
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/2881/
3 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderInitiatedRecoveryOnCommitTest.test
Error Message:
IOException occured when talking to server at:
http://127.0.0.1:59379/e_/tc/c8n_1x3_commits_shard1_replica1
Stack Trace:
I was looking at a JIRA issue someone posted pertaining to optimizing
highlighting for when there are term vectors ( SOLR-5855 ). I dug into the
details a bit and learned something unexpected:
CompressingTermVectorsReader.get(docId) fully loads all term vectors for
the document. The client/user
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated SOLR-7336:
-
Attachment: SOLR-7336.patch
Thanks Mark for the clarifications. I improved the javadocs of all the states
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/2878/
4 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedMLTComponentTest.test
Error Message:
Timeout occured while waiting response from server at:
http://127.0.0.1:50578/r/collection1
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley updated SOLR-6692:
---
Description:
in DefaultSolrHighlighter, the hl.maxAnalyzedChars figure is used to constrain
how much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley closed SOLR-7326.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Reduce hl.maxAnalyzedChars budget for multi-valued fields in the default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392802#comment-14392802
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5879:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392803#comment-14392803
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5879:
I committed to trunk ... I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392807#comment-14392807
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-7337:
--
Noble:
Thanks, I'm slammed and wasn't going
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson resolved LUCENE-6387.
Resolution: Not a Problem
Please raise issues like this on the user's list before raising
NOTE: i hit compile failure like this (TermRangeTermsEnum got removed).
I am going to remove these asserts: to me they don't look very useful,
and fix the build for now.
compile-test:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/home/rmuir/workspace/trunk/lucene/build/core/classes/test
[javac] Compiling 431
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392817#comment-14392817
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-7336:
---
Notes on states:
bq. ACTIVE
The replica is ready
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392855#comment-14392855
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-6386:
I thought we only write the final segments as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392859#comment-14392859
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6386:
-
Looking at the code, I think that is too
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/2877/
3 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderInitiatedRecoveryOnCommitTest.test
Error Message:
IOException occured when talking to server at:
http://127.0.0.1:50644/c8n_1x3_commits_shard1_replica2
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392701#comment-14392701
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5879:
-
+1
I thought those tests were gonna be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Potter updated SOLR-7338:
-
Attachment: SOLR-7338_test.patch
Not sure if it's useful to you, but here's the unit test I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392752#comment-14392752
]
Thomas Champagne commented on SOLR-5855:
I test again the patch with 100 queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392815#comment-14392815
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5879:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392816#comment-14392816
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-7274:
[~gchanan] Thanks for pitching in!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392876#comment-14392876
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-6386:
bq. I thought we only write the
Shawn Heisey created SOLR-7342:
--
Summary: zkcli command to delete node
Key: SOLR-7342
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7342
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows/4511/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_40 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrConfigHandler
Error Message:
Could not remove the following files (in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392831#comment-14392831
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-6388:
--
Oops, I thought by now ArrayList would be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392847#comment-14392847
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6388:
-
I removed the UOE because now the no-payload
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392811#comment-14392811
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-7336:
---
SYNC is just cruft - part of some prototyping at the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392822#comment-14392822
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-7274:
bq. Doesn't Apache Shiro do all of
Tom Winch created SOLR-7341:
---
Summary: xjoin - join data from external sources
Key: SOLR-7341
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7341
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Woops, thanks Rob!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
NOTE: i hit compile failure like this (TermRangeTermsEnum got removed).
I am going to remove these asserts: to me they don't look very useful,
and fix the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tom Winch updated SOLR-7341:
Description:
h2. XJoin
The xjoin SOLR contrib allows external results to be joined with SOLR results
in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392662#comment-14392662
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-6583:
---
I linked to SOLR-7338, as that is fairly related to
Boosts might not make sense to become immutable, it might make the
code too complex. Who is to say until the other stuff is fixed first.
The downsides might outweight the upsides.
So yeah, if you want to say if anyone disagrees with what the future
might look like i'm gonna -1 your progress, then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeroen Steggink resolved SOLR-7340.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Never mind, SolrJ was version 4.10, which explains it can't read from
Jeroen Steggink created SOLR-7340:
-
Summary: Collationions output changed for suggestions, SolrJ can't
read collations anymore
Key: SOLR-7340
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7340
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392688#comment-14392688
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-6386:
If there are more levels we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392770#comment-14392770
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-7338:
---
Anyway, we can spin that off into a new issue if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392489#comment-14392489
]
Ramkumar Aiyengar commented on LUCENE-3922:
---
[~cm], just got interested in this
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
first make queries immutable up to the boost and then discuss
if/how/when we should go fully immutable with a new API to change
boosts?
The “if” part concerns me; I don’t mind it being a separate issue to make
the changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated SOLR-7336:
-
Attachment: SOLR-7336.patch
* Add Replica.getState()
* Remove ZkStateReader state related constants and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392527#comment-14392527
]
Simon Endele commented on SOLR-6709:
Thank you guys very much for fixing/reviewing and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392582#comment-14392582
]
Shai Erera commented on SOLR-7336:
--
Forgot to mention that I also removed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392763#comment-14392763
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-7338:
---
bq. isReloaded feels more like isReloading
What's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392608#comment-14392608
]
Jens Wille commented on SOLR-7143:
--
First of all, thanks to Vitaliy for providing patches
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392603#comment-14392603
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-7338:
Without looking at the code/patches ;-) I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392624#comment-14392624
]
Ramkumar Aiyengar commented on LUCENE-6385:
---
[~mikemccand], [~thelabdude]:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392608#comment-14392608
]
Jens Wille edited comment on SOLR-7143 at 4/2/15 12:16 PM:
---
First
If we were designing things from scratch again, would boost really be
on Query, or would it be on BooleanClause?
Just throwing that out there... although it may make it easier to
implement immutable queries (and perhaps make more sense too), it may
also be too big of a change to be worth while.
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
