[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1062 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/1062/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexMetricsTest.testIndexMetrics Error Message: minorMerge: 3 expected:<4> but was:<3> Stack Trace:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7614) Allow single prefix "phrase*" in complexphrase queryparser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806949#comment-15806949 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7614: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7614) Allow single prefix "phrase*" in complexphrase queryparser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806907#comment-15806907 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7614: - Commit

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7620) UnifiedHighlighter: add target character width BreakIterator wrapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley updated LUCENE-7620: - Attachment: LUCENE_7620_UH_LengthGoalBreakIterator.patch Here's an update to the patch mostly

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.x - Build # 655 - Still Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.x/655/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.ltr.model.TestLinearModel Error Message: Suite timeout exceeded (>= 720 msec). Stack Trace: java.lang.Exception: Suite timeout exceeded (>= 720 msec).

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9918) An UpdateRequestProcessor to skip duplicate inserts and ignore updates to missing docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806603#comment-15806603 ] Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-9918: -- Thank you for giving the great explanation which is more than

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-9918) An UpdateRequestProcessor to skip duplicate inserts and ignore updates to missing docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Koji Sekiguchi reassigned SOLR-9918: Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi > An UpdateRequestProcessor to skip duplicate inserts and ignore

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5944) Support updates of numeric DocValues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806566#comment-15806566 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-5944: {quote} We're either going to need to change

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya updated SOLR-9941: --- Attachment: SOLR-9941.patch The attached patch seems to fix the problem, and feels

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_112) - Build # 673 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows/673/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_112 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDirectoryReader.testFilesOpenClose Error Message: Stack Trace:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7620) UnifiedHighlighter: add target character width BreakIterator wrapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806526#comment-15806526 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7620: -- bq. (Tim) For the following method, does it make sense to

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-7620) UnifiedHighlighter: add target character width BreakIterator wrapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806526#comment-15806526 ] David Smiley edited comment on LUCENE-7620 at 1/7/17 2:21 AM: -- bq. (Tim) For

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8292) TransactionLog.next() does not honor contract and return null for EOF

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806407#comment-15806407 ] Cao Manh Dat edited comment on SOLR-8292 at 1/7/17 1:59 AM: I think people

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5944) Support updates of numeric DocValues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806457#comment-15806457 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-5944: while reviewing some of ishan's recent commits to the jira/solr-5944

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806431#comment-15806431 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-9941: I'm guessing this situation exists because the {{RecentUpdates}} code was

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8292) TransactionLog.next() does not honor contract and return null for EOF

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806407#comment-15806407 ] Cao Manh Dat edited comment on SOLR-8292 at 1/7/17 1:33 AM: I think people

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9941) log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order

Hoss Man created SOLR-9941: -- Summary: log replay redundently (pre-)applies DBQs as if they were out of order Key: SOLR-9941 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9941 Project: Solr Issue

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8292) TransactionLog.next() does not honor contract and return null for EOF

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806407#comment-15806407 ] Cao Manh Dat commented on SOLR-8292: I think people kinda of misunderstanding this line {code} *

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Windows (32bit/jdk1.8.0_112) - Build # 6339 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/6339/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_112 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.test Error Message: timeout waiting to see all nodes active Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7620) UnifiedHighlighter: add target character width BreakIterator wrapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806121#comment-15806121 ] Jim Ferenczi commented on LUCENE-7620: -- I think the two methods to create the break iterator are

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-7620) UnifiedHighlighter: add target character width BreakIterator wrapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806094#comment-15806094 ] Timothy M. Rodriguez edited comment on LUCENE-7620 at 1/6/17 11:09 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7620) UnifiedHighlighter: add target character width BreakIterator wrapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806094#comment-15806094 ] Timothy M. Rodriguez commented on LUCENE-7620: -- Very useful! I like that it decorates an

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8593) Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15806078#comment-15806078 ] Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-8593: -- Great! If we had another week we could have gotten this into

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 601 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris/601/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.update.HardAutoCommitTest.testCommitWithin Error Message: Exception during query Stack Trace: java.lang.RuntimeException:

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9937) StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses atomic implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mike Drob updated SOLR-9937: Summary: StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses atomic implementation (was:

Re: 6.4 release

LUCENE-7620 (with SOLR-9935 adapter) for UnifiedHighlighter Passage min or target lengths. I'll commit this weekend. Very low risk of problems since it's an opt-in feature on the Lucene side, and opt-in to the UH on the Solr side as well (with the ability to disable this fragsize limit if you

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7620) UnifiedHighlighter: add target character width BreakIterator wrapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley updated LUCENE-7620: - Fix Version/s: 6.4 > UnifiedHighlighter: add target character width BreakIterator wrapper >

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7620) UnifiedHighlighter: add target character width BreakIterator wrapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley updated LUCENE-7620: - Attachment: LUCENE_7620_UH_LengthGoalBreakIterator.patch Here's an updated patch. I added

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.x - Build # 654 - Still Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.x/654/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPISolrJTest.testSplitShard Error Message: Error from server at https://127.0.0.1:57624/solr: Could not fully remove collection: solrj_test_splitshard Stack Trace:

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9940) Config API throws Index Not Mutable when creating a RequestHandler on a Classic Schema

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Webster Homer updated SOLR-9940: Priority: Minor (was: Major) > Config API throws Index Not Mutable when creating a RequestHandler

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8029) Modernize and standardize Solr APIs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805884#comment-15805884 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-8029: --- Commit

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9940) Config API throws Index Not Mutable when creating a RequestHandler on a Classic Schema

Webster Homer created SOLR-9940: --- Summary: Config API throws Index Not Mutable when creating a RequestHandler on a Classic Schema Key: SOLR-9940 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9940

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8593) Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805873#comment-15805873 ] Kevin Risden commented on SOLR-8593: Also merged master into jira/solr-8593 and fixed the merge

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9939) Ping handler logs each request twice

Shawn Heisey created SOLR-9939: -- Summary: Ping handler logs each request twice Key: SOLR-9939 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9939 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Security

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9939) Ping handler logs each request twice

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805862#comment-15805862 ] Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-9939: When I have some time I can look for the problem and try to fix

Re: AutomatonTermsEnum and fixed-string automata

Unfortunately I think that's somewhat dangerous because it creates an ambiguous API with a nasty performance trap? I.e. this new method won't invoke the fast Terms.intersect in the default terms dict? Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Alan Woodward

Re: 6.4 release

All done, thanks for checking. Have a good weekend. From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 01/06/17 18:23:06 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: 6.4 release Thanks all for your answers. Are we still good to build the first RC on Monday ? Christine maybe do you need more time ? 2017-01-05 5:47

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-8542) Integrate Learning to Rank into Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke resolved SOLR-8542. --- Resolution: Fixed Thanks everyone! > Integrate Learning to Rank into Solr >

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8542) Integrate Learning to Rank into Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke updated SOLR-8542: -- Description: This is a ticket to integrate learning to rank machine learning models into

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8542) Integrate Learning to Rank into Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke updated SOLR-8542: -- Description: This is a ticket to integrate learning to rank machine learning models into

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8593) Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805828#comment-15805828 ] Kevin Risden commented on SOLR-8593: Updated jira/solr-8593 branch with Calcite 0.11.0 since that was

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1061 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/1061/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.test Error Message: timeout waiting to see all nodes active Stack Trace:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8542) Integrate Learning to Rank into Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805800#comment-15805800 ] Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-8542: --- The bot did not (yet) update for it here but there

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9929) Documentation and sample code about how to train the model using user clicks when use ltr module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke updated SOLR-9929: -- Priority: Minor (was: Major) > Documentation and sample code about how to train the

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9929) Documentation and sample code about how to train the model using user clicks when use ltr module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke updated SOLR-9929: -- Issue Type: Task (was: Improvement) > Documentation and sample code about how to train

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7580) Spans tree scoring

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805767#comment-15805767 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-7580: -- SpanSynonymQuery is unusual here because it uses a single

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9929) Documentation and sample code about how to train the model using user clicks when use ltr module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805757#comment-15805757 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9929: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8542) Integrate Learning to Rank into Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805756#comment-15805756 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-8542: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9937) StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses more efficient implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805754#comment-15805754 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-9937: --- This issue not working creates the same problems SOLR-9901 intended

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9929) Documentation and sample code about how to train the model using user clicks when use ltr module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805749#comment-15805749 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9929: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9937) StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses more efficient implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805747#comment-15805747 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-9937: --- No, the behavior is not correct, we want a move to provide

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7580) Spans tree scoring

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-7580: - Attachment: LUCENE-7580.patch Patch of 6 Jan 2017. This contains: The changes in the patch of

Re: Installing PyLucene

On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, Jan Høydahl wrote: Hi, I hope you didn?t get this wrong! We all appreciate the existence of JCC/PyLucene and especially all the effort you?ve put into this. PyLucene is driven by its own community, and user involvement and contributions is a must. The (sub)project

Re: Installing PyLucene

Hi Thomas, On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, Thomas Koch wrote: I?ve just sent the link to the public gist with the patch to Petrus and this list. As mentioned by Oliver we?d be more than happy if a core developer of JCC/PyLucene could review the patch and decide what to do with it. It has been

[jira] [Reopened] (SOLR-9928) MetricsDirectoryFactory::renameWithOverwrite incorrectly calls super

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrzej Bialecki reopened SOLR-9928: - > MetricsDirectoryFactory::renameWithOverwrite incorrectly calls super >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7617) Improve GroupingSearch API and extensibility

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805662#comment-15805662 ] Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-7617: --- +1 Thanks for cleaning this up! I found a

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9636) Add support for javabin for /stream, /sql internode communication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805657#comment-15805657 ] Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-9636: -- I'll also test javabin with gatherNodes() graph traversal.

Re: AutomatonTermsEnum and fixed-string automata

Hm, how about something like this, on CompiledAutomaton: public TermsEnum getTermsEnum(TermsEnum te) throws IOException { switch (type) { case NONE: return TermsEnum.EMPTY; case ALL: return te; case SINGLE: return new SingleTermsEnum(te, term); case NORMAL:

Re: 6.4 release

Hi Jim, I’d like to get LUCENE-7609, LUCENE-7610 and LUCENE-7611 in - I’ll commit them over the weekend unless anybody squawks. Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk > On 6 Jan 2017, at 18:22, jim ferenczi wrote: > > Thanks all for your answers. > Are we still good to build

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9937) StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses more efficient implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805574#comment-15805574 ] Mike Drob commented on SOLR-9937: - The current behaviour is correct, but not optimal.efficient. Not sure

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7576) RegExp automaton causes NPE on Terms.intersect

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805539#comment-15805539 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7576: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7576) RegExp automaton causes NPE on Terms.intersect

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805536#comment-15805536 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7576: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7588) A parallel DrillSideways implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805350#comment-15805350 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7588: Thanks [~ekeller]! > A parallel DrillSideways

Re: AutomatonTermsEnum and fixed-string automata

These automaton intersection APIs are frustrating with all the special case handling... Ideas welcome! We've had similar challenges with them in the past, when a user invoked Terms.intersect directly instead of via CompiledAutomaton: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7576 The problem

Re: 6.4 release

I'm all done with 6.4 changes. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:22 PM, jim ferenczi wrote: > Thanks all for your answers. > Are we still good to build the first RC on Monday ? Christine maybe do you > need more time ? > > >

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.x - Build # 249 - Still unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.x/249/ 11 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.test Error Message: Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached. Stack Trace: java.lang.Exception: Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-9929) Documentation and sample code about how to train the model using user clicks when use ltr module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805240#comment-15805240 ] Diego Ceccarelli edited comment on SOLR-9929 at 1/6/17 6:41 PM: Thanks

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9929) Documentation and sample code about how to train the model using user clicks when use ltr module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Diego Ceccarelli updated SOLR-9929: --- Attachment: 0001-Improve-Learning-to-Rank-example-Readme.patch Improve Learning to Rank

Re: 6.4 release

Thanks all for your answers. Are we still good to build the first RC on Monday ? Christine maybe do you need more time ? 2017-01-05 5:47 GMT+01:00 Shalin Shekhar Mangar : > Aggregated metrics will not be in 6.4 -- that work is still in progress. > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7620) UnifiedHighlighter: add target character width BreakIterator wrapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805199#comment-15805199 ] Jim Ferenczi commented on LUCENE-7620: -- {quote} By choosing a lengthGoal on the low side; maybe "too

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9928) MetricsDirectoryFactory::renameWithOverwrite incorrectly calls super

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805150#comment-15805150 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-9928: --- The argument for hiding and doing a single unwrap everywhere seems

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9928) MetricsDirectoryFactory::renameWithOverwrite incorrectly calls super

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805115#comment-15805115 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-9928: --- Previously non of the impls unwrapped more than One layer and they

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9937) StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses more efficient implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805103#comment-15805103 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-9937: --- Nice catch. I suppose we should look at getting in a testing for

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-9937) StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses more efficient implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller reassigned SOLR-9937: - Assignee: Mark Miller > StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses more efficient implementation >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7588) A parallel DrillSideways implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805029#comment-15805029 ] Emmanuel Keller commented on LUCENE-7588: - Ok, I am able to reproduce the failure on my own

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8292) TransactionLog.next() does not honor contract and return null for EOF

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15805015#comment-15805015 ] Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-8292: -- [~caomanhdat317] All I was really looking for was whether, in

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9938) Improve the performance of CloudSolrStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-9938: - Description: Now that we have started to improve the efficiency of Streaming, I think it makes

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9938) Improve the performance of CloudSolrStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-9938: - Description: Now that we have started to improve the efficiency of Streaming, I think it makes

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9938) Improve the performance of CloudSolrStream

Joel Bernstein created SOLR-9938: Summary: Improve the performance of CloudSolrStream Key: SOLR-9938 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9938 Project: Solr Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9937) StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses more efficient implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mike Drob updated SOLR-9937: Attachment: SOLR-9937.patch [~markrmil...@gmail.com] - you were last to touch this in SOLR-9902, care to

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9928) MetricsDirectoryFactory::renameWithOverwrite incorrectly calls super

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15804976#comment-15804976 ] Mike Drob commented on SOLR-9928: - Ran some tests locally and it looks like the only two specializations

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9937) StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses more efficient implementation

Mike Drob created SOLR-9937: --- Summary: StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses more efficient implementation Key: SOLR-9937 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9937 Project: Solr

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-4116) Log Replay [recoveryExecutor-8-thread-1] - : java.io.EOFException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erick Erickson reassigned SOLR-4116: Assignee: Erick Erickson > Log Replay [recoveryExecutor-8-thread-1] - :

AutomatonTermsEnum and fixed-string automata

We’ve hit an issue while developing marple, where we want to have the ability to filter the values from a SortedDocValues terms dictionary. Normally you’d create a CompiledAutomaton from the filter string, and then call #getTermsEnum(Terms) on it; but for docvalues, we don’t have a Terms

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7620) UnifiedHighlighter: add target character width BreakIterator wrapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15804800#comment-15804800 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7620: -- bq. Though I wonder if we should also break the sentence if

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7617) Improve GroupingSearch API and extensibility

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alan Woodward updated LUCENE-7617: -- Attachment: LUCENE-7617.patch Thanks for the review Martijn! Here's an updated patch: * no

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9503) NPE in Replica Placement Rules when using Overseer Role with other rules

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15804750#comment-15804750 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9503: --- Commit

Re: PyLucene package test error

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 03:02, Shawn Gao wrote: > > Hello, PyLucene User and Developers > >Problems occurred during `make test` in pylucene-6.2.0 from PyLucen > Homepage when testing > 'test_PythonException.py'. And I think there might

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9936) Allow configuration for recoveryExecutor thread pool size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim Owen updated SOLR-9936: --- Description: There are two executor services in {{UpdateShardHandler}}, the {{updateExecutor}} whose size is

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9503) NPE in Replica Placement Rules when using Overseer Role with other rules

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15804740#comment-15804740 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9503: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7588) A parallel DrillSideways implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15804734#comment-15804734 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7588: Hmm the ES jenkins caught this failure:

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9936) Allow configuration for recoveryExecutor thread pool size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim Owen updated SOLR-9936: --- Attachment: SOLR-9936.patch > Allow configuration for recoveryExecutor thread pool size >

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9936) Allow configuration for recoveryExecutor thread pool size

Tim Owen created SOLR-9936: -- Summary: Allow configuration for recoveryExecutor thread pool size Key: SOLR-9936 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9936 Project: Solr Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7611) Make suggester module use LongValuesSource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alan Woodward updated LUCENE-7611: -- Attachment: LUCENE-7611.patch Updated patch, moving the constant() helper to LongValuesSource.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9777) IndexFingerprinting: use getCombinedCoreAndDeletesKey() instead of getCoreCacheKey() for per-segment caching

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15804572#comment-15804572 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-9777: I'm planning to commit this soon. So, if someone

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-9777) IndexFingerprinting: use getCombinedCoreAndDeletesKey() instead of getCoreCacheKey() for per-segment caching

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya reassigned SOLR-9777: -- Assignee: Ishan Chattopadhyaya (was: Noble Paul) > IndexFingerprinting: use

Solr Dedupe Issue

Hi Solr Dev, I'm attempting to get dedupe working in Solr 6.3.0 but am experiencing some issues. The updateRequestProcessorChain for dedupe doesn't appear to be working. We are running Solr 6.3.0 (in cloud mode) that is taking in data via a NiFi Flow using a "PutSolrContentStream" using the

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 600 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris/600/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoveryZkTest Error Message: ObjectTracker found 1 object(s) that were not

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_112) - Build # 18711 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/18711/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_112 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.test Error Message: timeout waiting to see all nodes active Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7614) Allow single prefix "phrase*" in complexphrase queryparser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15804457#comment-15804457 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7614: +1 > Allow single prefix "phrase*" in

  1   2   >