Re: 8.6 release

I tagged SOLR-14590 for 8.6, The PR is ready for review and I plan to merge it soon On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:54 PM Andrzej Białecki wrote: > Jan, > > I just removed SOLR-14182 from 8.6, this needs proper back-compat shims > and testing, and I don’t have enough time to get it done properly for

Re: Wiki access to post SIP

I tried to help Mike (user: nibeck) by creating the page for him but it seems he also doesn't have edit perms. On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 3:52 PM Nibeck, Mike wrote: > I need permission to post a proposal to the SIP pages. I don’t not current > have access to add the sub-page to document the

Re: 8.6 release

Jan, I just removed SOLR-14182 from 8.6, this needs proper back-compat shims and testing, and I don’t have enough time to get it done properly for 8.6. > On 26 Jun 2020, at 13:37, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > Unresolved Solr issues tagged with 8.6: >

Wiki access to post SIP

I need permission to post a proposal to the SIP pages. I don't not current have access to add the sub-page to document the proposal. Mike Nibeck Software Engineering Manager OCIO - IT Design and Development Library of Congress

Re: Should Solr expose OS specific file paths?

I believe output from Solr (logs or returned strings representing paths) should conform to the host platform convention. Solr should accept either convention as input regardless of the platform it's running on. Ilan On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 6:11 PM David Smiley wrote: > I started a conversation

Should Solr expose OS specific file paths?

I started a conversation in Slack with Jason but think Slack is too narrow of an audience so I'm going to copy-paste it here. We want your opinions! Here's a copy of it; I hope this doesn't look terrible on the mailing list. David Smiley Today at 11:49 AM

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-12.0.2) - Build # 27137 - Unstable!

The method that throws the exception has, guess what? A “SuppressWarnings” for unchecked. > On Jun 26, 2020, at 11:13 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server > wrote: > > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/27137/ > Java: 64bit/jdk-12.0.2 -XX:+UseCompressedOops

Re: 8.6 release

Thank you! On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:01 AM David Smiley wrote: > RE 8.x: Ant! > Gradle is master (9.x) > > ~ David > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:00 AM Theyaa Matti > wrote: > >> Would 8.6 use gradle for build or still use Ant? >> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:35 AM Michael Sokolov >>

Re: 8.6 release

RE 8.x: Ant! Gradle is master (9.x) ~ David On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:00 AM Theyaa Matti wrote: > Would 8.6 use gradle for build or still use Ant? > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:35 AM Michael Sokolov > wrote: > >> I think Simon is working on LUCENE-8962 and seems to be close, but we >> have

Re: 8.6 release

Would 8.6 use gradle for build or still use Ant? On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:35 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: > I think Simon is working on LUCENE-8962 and seems to be close, but we > have been here before; it's quite possible we need more time to fully > bake this change. I'll let him weigh in on

Re: 8.6 release

I think Simon is working on LUCENE-8962 and seems to be close, but we have been here before; it's quite possible we need more time to fully bake this change. I'll let him weigh in on whether he thinks targeting 8.6 is reasonable, but we might need to slip until 8.7 for that one On Fri, Jun 26,

Re: StreamExpressionTest failures

Wonder if Uwe has any insights? > On Jun 25, 2020, at 9:32 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > > This just started failing out of the blue today. I wonder what changed? Is it > straightforward to detect windows in the test cases? > > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > > On Thu,

Re: 8.6 release

Unresolved Solr issues tagged with 8.6: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SOLR%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%208.6

Re: 8.6 release

So the plan is to cut the release branch on next Tuesday June 30th. If you anticipate a problem with the date, please reply. Is there any JIRA issue that must be committed before the release is made and that has not already the appropriate "Fix Version"? Currently there 3 unresolved issues

Re: Lucene Highlighting Not Working Properly!!

You will need to provide more details in order for somebody to help you. On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:59 AM Ajaykumar Farakte wrote: > > Hello Team , > > I am using a lucene highlighter which is not properly working > Can you please help me to sort this issue. > > Thanks & Regards, >