Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

[Cassandra Targett]

Oh, I see what you meant! I actually just redid the changes from scratch 
instead of trying to backport the 9.0 changes as a patch, so no worries on that 
front. Thanks for thinking of me there though!

I just committed some changes for morelikethis.adoc that I decided I’d like to 
backport into branch_8_8 since we’re re-publishing…it’s docs-only, though.
On Mar 29, 2021, 2:25 PM -0500, Mike Drob , wrote:
> Thanks, Cassandra. When I skimmed the initial changeset, I saw that there 
> were changes to build.gradle - I assumed that there would have to be some 
> changes to build.xml in the 8x branch, but I didn't investigate further on 
> how they would differ. Was just trying to be helpful and give you a heads up 
> about it, but looks like I caused more confusion than help!
>
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:31 PM Cassandra Targett  
> > wrote:
> > > I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.
> > >
> > > Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build 
> > > process is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the 
> > > how-to-contribute page in the ref guide that talks about contributing and 
> > > building, etc.
> > > On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mike Drob , wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is 
> > > > absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some 
> > > > gradle->ant translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there 
> > > > more order to it?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward  
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals 
> > > > > queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, Alan
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera  wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries 
> > > > > > that causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This 
> > > > > > fix only touches one class tho so very low risk.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > lucene
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob  wrote:
> > > > > > > Ishan,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra 
> > > > > > > week to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, 
> > > > > > > others) coming up.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked 
> > > > > > > with fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
> > > > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 
> > > > > > > > in, but will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on 
> > > > > > > > vacation right now due to the festival of Holi)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > Ishan
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob,  
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 
> > > > > > > > > 30. If you have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before 
> > > > > > > > > then, please do so using your best judgement.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and 
> > > > > > > > > argue
> > > > > > > > >   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> > > > > > > > > * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 
> > > > > > > > > 8.8.2
> > > > > > > > >   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be 
> > > > > > > > > marked as Blocker
> > > > > > > > > * All patches that are intended for the branch should first 
> > > > > > > > > be committed
> > > > > > > > >   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and 
> > > > > > > > > then into
> > > > > > > > >   the current release branch.
> > > > > > > > > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority 
> > > > > > > > > "Blocker" will delay
> > > > > > > > >   a release candidate build.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Mike
> > > > >

Re: 9.0 release

[Michael Sokolov]

There has been some discussion around a few code visibility and naming
issues related to "VectorFormat" as it is called today. I'd like to
get that sorted out before 9.0 - I'll hunt up the ticket(s) and mark
as blockers

On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 11:02 AM Adrien Grand  wrote:
>
> Hello Jan,
>
> The list of blockers should be mostly up-to-date: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9661?jql=project%3D%22Lucene%20-%20Core%22%20and%20priority%3DBlocker%20and%20fixVersion%3D%22main%20(9.0)%22.
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 7:21 PM Jan Høydahl  wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Where are we at with the Lucene 9.0 release planning?
>>
>> The git split is largely done. Not sure about the build.
>> Let's update the umbrella issue 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9375 for known remaining 
>> cleanup tasks.
>> The one on that list is releaseWizard, but as Adrien says there are also 
>> other scripts that need updating.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> 13. jan. 2021 kl. 15:10 skrev Adrien Grand :
>>
>> +1 to start planning 9.0.
>>
>> Since you mentioned the Gradle build, I believe that we still need to 
>> migrate some of the release tooling from Ant to Gradle, e.g. 
>> dev-tools/scripts/addBackcompatIndexes.py. These scripts are not easy to 
>> test without actually doing a release so the 9.0 RM might have some 
>> debugging to do.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:17 PM Michael Sokolov  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone, as we head into a new year full of optimism, is it time
>>> to start discussing the next major release? We released 8.0 on Jun 18,
>>> 2019, over 18 months ago. Since then we've switched to a gradle-based
>>> build. We have added vector-valued fields and an HNSW neighbor search
>>> algorithm for them.  At the same time Solr has been getting a major
>>> overhaul which should justify a release, I think? IIRC there was talk
>>> of making 9.0 be the first release of Solr as its own TLP. Is it time
>>> to start planning for that now?
>>>
>>> -Mike
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Adrien

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

[Mike Drob]

Thanks, Cassandra. When I skimmed the initial changeset, I saw that there
were changes to build.gradle - I assumed that there would have to be some
changes to build.xml in the 8x branch, but I didn't investigate further on
how they would differ. Was just trying to be helpful and give you a heads
up about it, but looks like I caused more confusion than help!

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:31 PM Cassandra Targett 
wrote:

> I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.
>
> Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build
> process is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the
> how-to-contribute page in the ref guide that talks about contributing and
> building, etc.
> On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mike Drob , wrote:
>
>
> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is
> absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant
> translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward  > wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals
> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>
> Thanks, Alan
>
> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera  > wrote:
>
> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
> only touches one class tho so very low risk.
>
> lucene
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob  > wrote:
>
> Ishan,
>
> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to
> accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>
> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>
> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com >
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
> to the festival of Holi)
>
> Regards,
> Ishan
>
> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob,  > wrote:
>
> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>
> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
> have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
> your best judgement.
>
> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>
> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
> Blocker
> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>   the current release branch.
> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will delay
>   a release candidate build.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
>
>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

[Mike Drob]

I feel kind of weird about this one, is there a slightly less minimal patch
that is still reasonably safe and would let us continue to avoid
problematic terminology?

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:18 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe 
wrote:

> Mike,
> I'd like to backport SOLR-15216 (UI Fix)
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:55 AM Mike Drob  wrote:
>
>> Ignacio, Alan - I have looked at the patches and these should be safe to
>> backport and useful in a bugfix. Please go ahead and commit, and update
>> CHANGES entry as well.
>>
>> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is
>> absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant
>> translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals
>>> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>>>
>>> Thanks, Alan
>>>
>>> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
>>> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
>>> only touches one class tho so very low risk.
>>> lucene
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob  wrote:
>>>
 Ishan,

 Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week
 to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming 
 up.

 I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.

 Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
 fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.

 Mike

 On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
 ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in,
> but will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now
> due to the festival of Holi)
>
> Regards,
> Ishan
>
> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob,  wrote:
>
>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>
>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If
>> you have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so
>> using your best judgement.
>>
>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>
>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>>   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>> Blocker
>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
>> committed
>>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>   the current release branch.
>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>> delay
>>   a release candidate build.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>
>>>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

[Cassandra Targett]

I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.

Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build process 
is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the how-to-contribute page in 
the ref guide that talks about contributing and building, etc.
On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mike Drob , wrote:
>
> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is 
> absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant 
> translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward  wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals queries) 
> > and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
> >
> > Thanks, Alan
> >
> > > On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera  wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that 
> > > causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix only 
> > > touches one class tho so very low risk.
> > >
> > > lucene
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob  wrote:
> > > > Ishan,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week 
> > > > to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) 
> > > > coming up.
> > > >
> > > > I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
> > > >
> > > > Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with 
> > > > fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, 
> > > > > but will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation 
> > > > > right now due to the festival of Holi)
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Ishan
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob,  wrote:
> > > > > > I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If 
> > > > > > you have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please 
> > > > > > do so using your best judgement.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
> > > > > >   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> > > > > > * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
> > > > > >   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked 
> > > > > > as Blocker
> > > > > > * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be 
> > > > > > committed
> > > > > >   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then 
> > > > > > into
> > > > > >   the current release branch.
> > > > > > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" 
> > > > > > will delay
> > > > > >   a release candidate build.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Mike
> >

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

[Tomás Fernández Löbbe]

Mike,
I'd like to backport SOLR-15216 (UI Fix)

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:55 AM Mike Drob  wrote:

> Ignacio, Alan - I have looked at the patches and these should be safe to
> backport and useful in a bugfix. Please go ahead and commit, and update
> CHANGES entry as well.
>
> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is
> absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant
> translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals
>> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>>
>> Thanks, Alan
>>
>> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
>> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
>> only touches one class tho so very low risk.
>> lucene
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob  wrote:
>>
>>> Ishan,
>>>
>>> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week
>>> to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>>>
>>> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>>>
>>> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
>>> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Mike,

 I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
 will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
 to the festival of Holi)

 Regards,
 Ishan

 On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob,  wrote:

> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>
> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If
> you have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so
> using your best judgement.
>
> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>
> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
> Blocker
> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
> committed
>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>   the current release branch.
> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
> delay
>   a release candidate build.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>

>>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

[Mike Drob]

Ignacio, Alan - I have looked at the patches and these should be safe to
backport and useful in a bugfix. Please go ahead and commit, and update
CHANGES entry as well.

Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is
absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant
translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward  wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals
> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>
> Thanks, Alan
>
> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>
> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
> only touches one class tho so very low risk.
> lucene
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob  wrote:
>
>> Ishan,
>>
>> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to
>> accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>>
>> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>>
>> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
>> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
>>> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
>>> to the festival of Holi)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ishan
>>>
>>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob,  wrote:
>>>
 I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8

 I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
 have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
 your best judgement.

 Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:

 * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
 * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
 Blocker
 * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
   the current release branch.
 * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
 delay
   a release candidate build.

 Thanks,
 Mike

>>>
>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

[Alan Woodward]

Hi Mike,

I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals queries) and 
LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).

Thanks, Alan

> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera  > wrote:
> 
> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that 
> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix only 
> touches one class tho so very low risk.
> lucene  
> 
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob  > wrote:
> Ishan,
> 
> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to 
> accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
> 
> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
> 
> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with fixVersion 
> in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
> mailto:ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> 
> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 
>  in, but will likely be 
> able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due to the festival 
> of Holi)
> 
> Regards,
> Ishan
> 
> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob,  > wrote:
> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
> 
> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you have 
> small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using your 
> best judgement.
> 
> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
> 
> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as Blocker
> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>   the current release branch.
> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will delay
>   a release candidate build.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

[Cassandra Targett]

You mentioned maybe re-publishing the Ref Guide in one of the issues, do you 
still want to do that? If so, I should backport URL changes for the project 
split (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15212) - it won’t be a 
problem for me to do that before the end of this week.
On Mar 29, 2021, 3:47 AM -0500, Ignacio Vera , wrote:
> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that 
> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix only 
> touches one class tho so very low risk.
> lucene
>
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob  wrote:
> > > Ishan,
> > >
> > > Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to 
> > > accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
> > >
> > > I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
> > >
> > > Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with 
> > > fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, 
> > > > > but will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation 
> > > > > right now due to the festival of Holi)
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Ishan
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob,  wrote:
> > > > > > > I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. 
> > > > > > > If you have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, 
> > > > > > > please do so using your best judgement.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
> > > > > > >   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> > > > > > > * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
> > > > > > >   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be 
> > > > > > > marked as Blocker
> > > > > > > * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be 
> > > > > > > committed
> > > > > > >   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then 
> > > > > > > into
> > > > > > >   the current release branch.
> > > > > > > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" 
> > > > > > > will delay
> > > > > > >   a release candidate build.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Mike

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

[Ignacio Vera]

I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
only touches one class tho so very low risk.
lucene

On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob  wrote:

> Ishan,
>
> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to
> accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>
> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>
> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
>> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
>> to the festival of Holi)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ishan
>>
>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob,  wrote:
>>
>>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>>
>>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
>>> have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
>>> your best judgement.
>>>
>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>
>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>>   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>>>   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>> Blocker
>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>>>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>>   the current release branch.
>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>>> delay
>>>   a release candidate build.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mike
>>>
>>