temporary file access denied on Windows
---
Key: LUCENE-665
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-665
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Store
Affects Versions:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-565?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-565:
---
Attachment: TestBufferedDeletesPerf.java
perf-test-res.JPG
perfres.log
I ran a performance test for interleaved adds and removes
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-665?page=comments#action_12430919 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-665:
just to confirm, is it the COMMIT lock that's throwing these
unhandled exceptions (not the WRITE lock)?
If so,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-665?page=comments#action_12431100 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-665:
obtain() is supposed to return success or failure immediately.
I'd be tempted to override obtain(timout) for FS locks
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-635?page=comments#action_12431341 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-635:
While updating my patch for 665 according the changes here, I noticed something
- I may be wrong here - but it seems to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-565?page=comments#action_12431354 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-565:
Is it that results that were returned are suddenly (say after updates) not
returned anymore (indicating something bad
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-565?page=comments#action_12431419 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-565:
Just to make sure on the scenario - are you -
(1) using NewIndexModifier at all, or
(2) just letting Solr use this
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-665?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-665:
---
Attachment: FSDirs_Retry_Logic_3.patch
I am attaching an updated patch - FSDirs_Retry_Logic_3.patch.
In this update:
- merge with code changes by issue 635
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-635?page=comments#action_12431666 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-635:
We could (as you're suggesting) indeed extend FSDirectory so that it
provided the low level methods required by a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-665?page=comments#action_12431801 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-665:
I think I know which software is causing/exposing this behavior in my
environment.
This is the SVN client I am using -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-565?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-565:
---
Attachment: perf-test-res2.JPG
Updated performance test results - perf-test-res2.JPG - in avarage, the new
code is *9* times faster!
What have changed? - in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-565?page=comments#action_12432216 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-565:
I agree - I also suspected it might change the merge behavior (and also had
reflections from the repeated trials to have
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-665?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-665:
---
Attachment: FSWinDirectory.patch
Attached patch - FSWinDirectory - implements retry logic of FS operations in a
separate non default directory class as
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=comments#action_12436980 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-675:
Few things that would be nice to have in this performance package/framework -
() indexing only overall time.
() indexing
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-665?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-665:
---
Attachment: FSWinDirectory_26_Sep_06.patch
Updated the patch according to review comments by Hoss, plus:
- protect currMillis usage from system clock
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-664:
---
Attachment: boosts_plus_scoring_formula.patch
(1) added a section in Scoring.xml for Search Results Boosts, on ways to
boost in Lucene, at search time and at
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664?page=comments#action_12438854 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-664:
Hi Grant,
For part 1, I am ok with having it after the scoring formula.
For part 2, my motivation was to make it more
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664?page=comments#action_12439370 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-664:
Two quick questions:
I think 'norm' is a good term for the product of lengthNorm(d) and
field boost. That's what it is
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664?page=comments#action_12440592 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-664:
Going to work on this now, according to comments by Doug and Grant.
Will give a try to the include idea - client side
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664?page=comments#action_12440648 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-664:
I played with including the formula from a separate file, Client Side Include.
=== Summary ===
I think the include is
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-664:
---
Attachment: scoring_formula_2.patch
I am attaching scoring_formula_2.patch - modifed scoring formula as suggested.
Additional changes here:
- order of the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664?page=comments#action_12441194 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-664:
One comment for Scoring.html:
Tthe last sentence in the Score Boosting paragraph says:
At scoring (search) time,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664?page=comments#action_12441280 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-664:
I just noticed that the link to TermScorer in Understanding the Scoring
Formula is broken b/c TermScorer has package
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-678?page=comments#action_12443304 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-678:
The patch added a call to writer.close() in TestLockFactory -
testFSDirectoryTwoCreates().
This is just before the 2nd
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-678?page=comments#action_1244 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-678:
Michael, I must be misunderstanding something then...
That test case is verifying that the 2nd index writer indeed
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-686?page=comments#action_12444742 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-686:
An example of how current Lucene code relies on not having to close resoures,
in PhraseQuery:
...
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-697?page=comments#action_12444744 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-697:
I can reproduce this by uncommenting this line.
Interesting to notice that:
(1) the sequence to next() next() skip()
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-697?page=all ]
Doron Cohen reassigned LUCENE-697:
--
Assignee: Doron Cohen
Scorer.skipTo affects sloppyPhrase scoring
--
Key: LUCENE-697
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-569?page=comments#action_12445284 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-569:
It seems that having assert() in NearSpanOrdered.java now required Java
1.5 in order to compile Lucene. This would
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-697?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-697:
---
Attachment: sloppy_phrase_skipTo.patch
This was tricky, for me anyhow, but I think I found it.
The difference in scoring between using next() to using skipTo()
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-569?page=comments#action_12445294 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-569:
Chris Hostetter wrote:
Really? ... the build.xml currently sets the javac -source and -target to
1.4 so if that were
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-697?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-697:
---
Lucene Fields: [Patch Available] (was: [New])
Scorer.skipTo affects sloppyPhrase scoring
--
Key:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-665?page=comments#action_12445507 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-665:
Michael, I am not able to generate this with native locks. (did not try with
lockless commits).
Which brings me to think
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-665?page=comments#action_12445724 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-665:
Odd that just by using native locking, it stopped your issues.
Agree. I did not expect that to happen, since indeed I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-697?page=comments#action_12445795 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-697:
An updated version of this patch - sloppy_phrase_skipTo.patch2.
I modified QueryUtils.java (test util) to test all the
Index File Format - Example for frequency file .frq is wrong
Key: LUCENE-706
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-706
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-706?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-706:
---
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Index File Format - Example for frequency file .frq is wrong
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-706?page=comments#action_12447049 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-706:
Right, sorry, copied that hex data from an .frq of an index with a different
example, where the frequencies were 1 in doc
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-675:
---
Attachment: timedata.zip
I tried it and it is working nice! -
1st run downloaded the documents from the Web before starting to index.
2nd run started right off
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=comments#action_12449117 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-675:
I looked at extending the benchmark with:
- different test scenarios, i.e. other sequences of operations.
- multithreaded
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-675:
---
Attachment: tiny.alg
tiny.properties
I am attaching a sample tiny.* - the .alg and .properties files I currently use
- I think they may help to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=comments#action_12449419 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-675:
Sounds good.
In this case I will add my stuff under a new package:
org.apache.lucene.benchmark2. (this package would
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=comments#action_12449779 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-675:
Good point on names with numbers - I'm renaming the package to taskBenchmark,
as I think of it as task sequence based,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=comments#action_12449947 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-675:
Would be nice to get some feedback on what I already have at this point for the
task based benchmark framework for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-675:
---
Attachment: benchmark.byTask.patch
I am attaching benchmark.byTask.patch - to be applied in the contrib/benchmark
directory.
Root package of byTask classes
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-717?page=comments#action_12453672 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-717:
That's because junit,jar is required for compiling and running the tests.
(Guess we can't distribute junit.jar with
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-717?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-717:
---
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
src builds fail because of no lib directory
-
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-717?page=comments#action_12453738 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-717:
I'm ok with this...
src builds fail because of no lib directory
-
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-708?page=comments#action_12454375 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-708:
Could official be the most recent release (currently 2.0)?
So there would be:
Official (2.0)
Nightly
1.9.1
1.9
Sloppy Phrase Scoring Misbehavior
-
Key: LUCENE-736
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-736
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Search
Reporter: Doron Cohen
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-736?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-736:
---
Attachment: sloppy_phrase_tests.patch.txt
sloppy_phrase_tests.patch.txt contains:
- two test cases added in TestPhraseQuery.
These new tests currently fail.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-736?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-736:
---
Attachment: sloppy_phrase_java.patch.txt
perf-search-new.log
perf-search-orig.log
Attached sloppy_phrase_java.patch.txt is fixing
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-736?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-736:
---
Attachment: sloppy_phrase.patch2.txt
res-search-orig2.log
res-search-new2.log
The change to fix case 2 was not the main
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-736?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-736:
---
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Sloppy Phrase Scoring Misbehavior
-
Key: LUCENE-736
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-736?page=comments#action_12455422 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-736:
There is a bug in my recent patch (sloppy_phrase.patch2.txt):
- for the case of phrase with repetitions, some additional
read/write .del as d-gaps when the deleted bit vector is sufficiently sparse
-
Key: LUCENE-738
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-738
Project: Lucene - Java
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-738?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-738:
---
Attachment: del.dgap.patch.txt
Patch added: del.dgap.patch.txt for the above optn (1) writing d-gaps for
ids of deleted docs.
Patch changes index format, but
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-738?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-738:
---
Lucene Fields: [Patch Available] (was: [New])
read/write .del as d-gaps when the deleted bit vector is sufficiently sparse
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-738?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-738:
---
Attachment: FileFormatDoc.patch.txt
FileFormat document updated to reflect this format change.
read/write .del as d-gaps when the deleted bit vector is
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-740?page=comments#action_12457462 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-740:
In addition to SnowballProgram bug fix there are few updates in
snowball.tartarus.org comparing to snowball stemmers in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-740?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-740:
---
Attachment: snowball.patch.txt
Updated + new stemmers and SnowballProgram fix from http://snowball.tartarus.org
Bugs in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-740?page=comments#action_12457605 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-740:
Attached snowball.patch.txt has latest and greatest plus new test case in
TestSnowball that demostrates this Kp stemmer
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-740?page=comments#action_12457619 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-740:
Two comments:
1. Testing: There's only limited testing in Lucene's contrib for these stemmers
- we could probably add a
Maintain norms in a single file .nrm
Key: LUCENE-756
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Doron Cohen
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=all ]
Doron Cohen reassigned LUCENE-756:
--
Assignee: Doron Cohen
Maintain norms in a single file .nrm
Key: LUCENE-756
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-756:
---
Attachment: nrm.patch.txt
Attached patch - nrm.patch.txt - modifies field norms maintenance to a single
.nrm file.
Modification is backwards compatible -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-756:
---
Lucene Fields: [Patch Available] (was: [New])
Maintain norms in a single file .nrm
Key: LUCENE-756
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-756:
---
Component/s: Index
Maintain norms in a single file .nrm
Key: LUCENE-756
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-756:
---
Attachment: (was: nrm.patch.txt)
Maintain norms in a single file .nrm
Key: LUCENE-756
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-756:
---
Attachment: nrm.patch.txt
Replacing the patch file (prev file was garbage - svn stat instead of svn
diff).
Few words on how this patch works:
- segment.nrm
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=comments#action_12460292 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-756:
Does this mean a separate file outside the final .cfs files?
Oh no - there's a single .nrm file in the .cfs file
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=comments#action_12460316 ]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-756:
Thanks for the comments, Doug.
You're right of course, I will add both the header and the constant.
(that would be either
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-756:
---
Attachment: nrm.patch.2.txt
nrm.patch.2.txt:
Updated as Doug suggested:
- .nrm extension now maintained in a constant .
- .nrm file now has a 4 bytes header.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462069
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-756:
I am updating the patch (nrm.patch.3.txt):
- using a single constant for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-756:
---
Attachment: nrm.patch.3.txt
Maintain norms in a single file .nrm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462287
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-675:
Grant, thanks for trying this out - I will update the patch shortly.
I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-675:
---
Attachment: byTask.2.patch.txt
Lucene benchmark: objective performance test for Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462774
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-756:
Thanks for commiting this Yonik!
Seems the added test TestNorms was not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463176
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-140:
Amazed by this long lasting bug report I was going similar routes to Mike,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463483
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-140:
Jed, is it possible that when re-creating the index, while IndexWriter is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-675:
---
Attachment: byTask.jre1.4.patch.txt
Lucene benchmark: objective performance test for Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463830
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-675:
Oops... I had the impression that compiling with compliance level 1.4 is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464105
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-741:
I was looking at what it would take to make this work with .nrm file as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-741:
---
Attachment: for.nrm.patch
Field norm modifier (CLI tool)
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-741:
---
Attachment: (was: for.nrm.patch)
Field norm modifier (CLI tool)
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-741:
---
Attachment: for.nrm.patch
Field norm modifier (CLI tool)
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464109
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-741:
Attached for.nrm.patch was very noisy - so I replaced it with one created
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464250
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-665:
Hi Michael,
Funny that I got this email with reply-to to you rather than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen resolved LUCENE-665.
Resolution: Won't Fix
With lockless commits this is no longer reproducable, and although
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464395
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-771:
Is that true? I thought that for previous format changes, the combination
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465260
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-756:
Michael, I like this improvement!
(At first I considered adding such
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466636
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-781:
I checked - the fix is working and code seems right.
While we are looking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466852
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-781:
I thought it would not break MultiReader, just do unnecessary work for that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467953
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-781:
One could write an application that groups readers to multiReaders in more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-788:
---
Attachment: 788_benchmark_parseDate_locale_Jan_27.patch
Locale.US passed to SimpleDateFormat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-788:
---
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
contrib/benchmark assumes Locale.US for parsing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-804:
---
Attachment: 804.build.xml.patch
804.build.xml.patch removes loadable jars from the src_dist
and adds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-804:
---
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
build.xml: result of dist-src should support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-804:
---
Lucene Fields: [Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New])
Affects Version/s: (was:
bufferDeleteTerm in IndexWriter might flush prematurely
---
Key: LUCENE-808
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-808
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
201 - 300 of 748 matches
Mail list logo
