[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16208362#comment-16208362
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-6312:
---
As of 7.0.1, three years later, yes, I think it is still an open
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15838581#comment-15838581
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-7269:
---
Any life still here? I've always thought it was strange that Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15816053#comment-15816053
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-5170:
---
Well, yes, I'm interested. I've got enough other work projects going
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15812871#comment-15812871
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-5170:
---
It's coming up on two years, and I'm aware there have been some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15743325#comment-15743325
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4735:
---
Understood, and not all cores are part of a collection. But if it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15743207#comment-15743207
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4735:
---
That's almost perfect. Can we replace those underscores with dots?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15743201#comment-15743201
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4735:
---
Oh, one thing just occurred to me though. There are essentially two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15742740#comment-15742740
]
Jeff Wartes edited comment on SOLR-4735 at 12/12/16 6:38 PM:
-
I've fallen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15742740#comment-15742740
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4735:
---
I've fallen behind keeping up with your changes, but for what it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15716772#comment-15716772
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4735:
---
That seems pretty viable too. As I mentioned, the memory overhead of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15716247#comment-15716247
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4735:
---
Yeah, I get that. I like this line of thought because it means we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15715880#comment-15715880
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4735:
---
`MetricRegistry` is really just a bunch of convenience methods and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15707000#comment-15707000
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4735:
---
Heh, I wondered whether something like that would happen if I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15696479#comment-15696479
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4735:
---
I had a scheme for collapsable namespaced registries in my original
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15693874#comment-15693874
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4735:
---
>From what I see, SolrMetricManager only needs the SolrCore for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15690992#comment-15690992
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4735:
---
For what it's worth, this looks like really great stuff to me.
I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15684725#comment-15684725
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8785:
---
Understood, I'm all for incremental change, and I don't see "how to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15626442#comment-15626442
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4735:
---
I have, and am, by instantiating a SharedMetricRegistry and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595671#comment-15595671
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8785:
---
For the record, it looks like I wrote this patch against master,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-4449:
--
Labels: patch patch-available (was: patch-available)
> Enable backup requests for the internal solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-8785:
--
Labels: patch patch-available (was: patch-available)
> Use Metrics library for core metrics
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-4449:
--
Labels: patch-available (was: )
> Enable backup requests for the internal solr load balancer
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-8785:
--
Labels: patch-available (was: )
> Use Metrics library for core metrics
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15392504#comment-15392504
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-6581:
---
For what it's worth, I recall having a bad experience with that hint
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15392297#comment-15392297
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-9335:
---
fwiw, SOLR-8241 involves cache implementations that (among other
Jeff Wartes created SOLR-9133:
-
Summary: UUID FieldType shouldn't be stored as a String
Key: SOLR-9133
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9133
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15287339#comment-15287339
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-9125:
---
Isn't there a chicken-and-egg situation there? You need the set of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15286940#comment-15286940
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-9125:
---
I messed around a little bit, but I don't have a solution for this.
Jeff Wartes created SOLR-9125:
-
Summary: CollapseQParserPlugin allocations are index based, not
query based
Key: SOLR-9125
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9125
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15282958#comment-15282958
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8697:
---
Does this fix SOLR-6498?
> Fix LeaderElector issues
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15267176#comment-15267176
]
Jeff Wartes commented on LUCENE-7258:
-
Ok, yeah, that’s a reasonable thing to assume. We usually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15265829#comment-15265829
]
Jeff Wartes commented on LUCENE-7258:
-
There are actually three threads going on this ticket right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15264309#comment-15264309
]
Jeff Wartes commented on LUCENE-7258:
-
I'm not sure I understand how the dangers of large FBS size
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15260960#comment-15260960
]
Jeff Wartes commented on LUCENE-7258:
-
I'd be interested in trying TimSort, or something like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated LUCENE-7258:
Attachment: LUCENE-7258-Tune-memory-allocation-rate-for-Intersec.patch
After 24 hours, I found I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15258929#comment-15258929
]
Jeff Wartes commented on LUCENE-7258:
-
Random aside: I did do one test run where I changed all usages
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated LUCENE-7258:
Attachment: allocation_plot.jpg
Attaching the graph directly.
> Tune DocIdSetBuilder allocation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15258848#comment-15258848
]
Jeff Wartes commented on LUCENE-7258:
-
I put this patch on a production node this morning, looks like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated LUCENE-7258:
Attachment: LUCENE-7258-Tune-memory-allocation-rate-for-Intersec.patch
This patch does the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15258834#comment-15258834
]
Jeff Wartes commented on LUCENE-7258:
-
The "eia" label represents using the ExpandingIntArray
Jeff Wartes created LUCENE-7258:
---
Summary: Tune Spatial RPT Intersects allocation rate
Key: LUCENE-7258
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7258
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15237853#comment-15237853
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8944:
---
Results from applying this patch were quite positive, but for more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-8944:
--
Attachment: SOLR-8944-Use-DocIdSetBuilder-instead-of-FixedBitSet.patch
[~dsmiley]'s suggestion was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15235935#comment-15235935
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8241:
---
Since Solr requires Java 8 as of 6.0, it seems like this patch could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15229260#comment-15229260
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8922:
---
I stumbled onto SJK recently, which provides me a more lightweight
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15226948#comment-15226948
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8944:
---
I hadn't refreshed and didn't see this comment before I added mine,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15226709#comment-15226709
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8944:
---
It was an easy test, so I tried simply using a SparseFixedBitSet
Jeff Wartes created SOLR-8944:
-
Summary: Improve geospatial garbage generation
Key: SOLR-8944
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8944
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15220342#comment-15220342
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8922:
---
Both of those appear to add capacity by declaring a new array and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15220299#comment-15220299
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8922:
---
With some tweaking, I was able to get G1 pause to about the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15220136#comment-15220136
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8922:
---
Ok, so after a little more than 12 hours on one of my production
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15220052#comment-15220052
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8922:
---
Incidentally, I had one or two other findings from my garbage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15220045#comment-15220045
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8922:
---
Absolutely. Memory pools were my first thought, between when I saw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219066#comment-15219066
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8922:
---
Not yet. The major risk area would be the new ExpandingIntArray
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218974#comment-15218974
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8922:
---
For my index, (86M-doc shards and a per-shard 99.9th percentile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-8922:
--
Attachment: SOLR-8922.patch
This is essentially the same patch as in SOLR-5444, but applies cleanly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218910#comment-15218910
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8922:
---
SOLR-5444 had a patch to help with this,
Jeff Wartes created SOLR-8922:
-
Summary: DocSetCollector can allocate massive garbage on large
indexes
Key: SOLR-8922
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922
Project: Solr
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15212210#comment-15212210
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-7887:
---
SOLR-7698 and SOLR-6377 both have attempts at logback watchers, I
Jeff Wartes created SOLR-8785:
-
Summary: Use Metrics library for core metrics
Key: SOLR-8785
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15169572#comment-15169572
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8725:
---
Well, I'm glad I haven't tried moving to 5.5 yet, this would have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15117568#comment-15117568
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8531:
---
Looks like this was resolved in SOLR-8561
> ZK leader path changed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes resolved SOLR-8531.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.4.1
> ZK leader path changed in 5.4
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes closed SOLR-8531.
-
> ZK leader path changed in 5.4
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-8531
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091427#comment-15091427
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8531:
---
I just looked again, and 5.4 is indeed writing the leader data to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15090732#comment-15090732
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8531:
---
1. A fully upgraded cluster behaves normally.
2. The problem is only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15090706#comment-15090706
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8531:
---
I was imagining a note
Jeff Wartes created SOLR-8531:
-
Summary: ZK leader path changed in 5.4
Key: SOLR-8531
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8531
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15053711#comment-15053711
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4449:
---
For what it's worth, if I were a solr committer, I probably wouldn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15053665#comment-15053665
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4449:
---
I looked around a bit, and unless I'm missing something, it looks
Jeff Wartes created SOLR-8171:
-
Summary: Facet query filterCache usage is psychic
Key: SOLR-8171
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8171
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14949141#comment-14949141
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4449:
---
Ah, great. Yeah, same thing. I knew it had been discussed in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14947724#comment-14947724
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4449:
---
I've added performance tracking to this, so that you can request a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14933631#comment-14933631
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8059:
---
I've seen this too. I assumed it was related to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14901555#comment-14901555
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-4449:
---
I pulled this patch out into a freestanding jar and ported it to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14703723#comment-14703723
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-7698:
---
Also see SOLR-6377
solr alternative logback
Jeff Wartes created SOLR-7493:
-
Summary: Requests aren't distributed evenly if the collection
isn't present locally
Key: SOLR-7493
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7493
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-7493:
--
Labels: (was: pat)
Requests aren't distributed evenly if the collection isn't present locally
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-7493:
--
Attachment: SOLR-7493.patch
It looks like this happens because SolrDispatchFilter's getRemoteCoreURL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-7493:
--
Labels: pat (was: )
Requests aren't distributed evenly if the collection isn't present locally
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14509521#comment-14509521
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-5170:
---
I got tired of maintaining a custom solr build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-5170:
--
Attachment: SOLR-5170_spatial_multi-value_sort_via_docvalues.patch
Updated to work with Solr 4.9
Jeff Wartes created SOLR-5917:
-
Summary: Allow dismax wildcard field specifications
Key: SOLR-5917
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5917
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-5170:
--
Attachment: SOLR-5170_spatial_multi-value_sort_via_docvalues.patch.txt
Adds recipDistance scoring,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13864738#comment-13864738
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-5170:
---
I've been using this patch with some minor tweaks
85 matches
Mail list logo
