Tim Owen created SOLR-9374:
--
Summary: Speed up Jmx MBean retrieval for FieldCache
Key: SOLR-9374
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9374
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9374:
---
Attachment: SOLR-9374.patch
> Speed up Jmx MBean retrieval for FieldCache
>
Tim Owen created SOLR-9381:
--
Summary: Snitch for freedisk uses root path not Solr home
Key: SOLR-9381
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9381
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9381:
---
Attachment: SOLR-9381.patch
> Snitch for freedisk uses root path not Solr home
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9389:
---
Description:
The HdfsTransactionLog implementation keeps a Hadoop FSDataOutputStream open
for its whole
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9389:
---
Attachment: SOLR-9389.patch
> HDFS Transaction logs stay open for writes which leaks Xceivers
>
Tim Owen created SOLR-9389:
--
Summary: HDFS Transaction logs stay open for writes which leaks
Xceivers
Key: SOLR-9389
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9389
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
Title: Message Title
Tim Owen updated an issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15456179#comment-15456179
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9389:
Thanks for the advice David, I'll take a look at the concurrency setting,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9381:
---
Attachment: SOLR-9381.patch
> Snitch for freedisk uses root path not Solr home
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15451652#comment-15451652
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9381:
This code was last changed by [~andyetitmoves] and [~noble.paul] .. do you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15451626#comment-15451626
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9389:
[~dsmiley] We're now running 6 Solr JVMs per box, as the machines in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15448437#comment-15448437
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9374:
No problem, thanks for merging!
> Speed up Jmx MBean retrieval for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15448406#comment-15448406
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9389:
Great, thanks for reviewing and testing this Mark :)
> HDFS Transaction
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15452260#comment-15452260
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9381:
Thanks, I'll make that change soon and replace the patch.
> Snitch for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15452531#comment-15452531
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9389:
We're using Solr 6.1 (on local disk now, as mentioned). The first
Tim Owen created SOLR-9503:
--
Summary: NPE in Replica Placement Rules when using Overseer Role
with other rules
Key: SOLR-9503
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9503
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9503:
---
Attachment: SOLR-9503.patch
> NPE in Replica Placement Rules when using Overseer Role with other rules
>
Tim Owen created SOLR-9505:
--
Summary: Extra tests to confirm Atomic Update remove behaviour
Key: SOLR-9505
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9505
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9505:
---
Attachment: SOLR-9505.patch
> Extra tests to confirm Atomic Update remove behaviour
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15484252#comment-15484252
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9503:
As an aside, I noticed that `Rule.Operand.GREATER_THAN` seems to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15644382#comment-15644382
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9490:
Just to add to this, if anyone was using 6.2.0 and doing document updates,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15585823#comment-15585823
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-5750:
[~dsmiley] you mentioned in the mailing list back in March that you'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15585826#comment-15585826
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-5750:
[~dsmiley] you mentioned in the mailing list back in March that you'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15701538#comment-15701538
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-8793:
We get this using Solr 6.3.0 because it's still logged at WARN level,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9503:
---
Attachment: SOLR-9503.patch
I went through the tests and found that if I added another rule to the existing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15804336#comment-15804336
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9918:
OK I see what you mean, I can explain our use-case if that helps to
Tim Owen created SOLR-9915:
--
Summary: PeerSync alreadyInSync check is not backwards compatible
Key: SOLR-9915
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9915
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9915:
---
Attachment: SOLR-9915.patch
> PeerSync alreadyInSync check is not backwards compatible
>
Tim Owen created SOLR-9918:
--
Summary: An UpdateRequestProcessor to skip duplicate inserts and
ignore updates to missing docs
Key: SOLR-9918
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9918
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9918:
---
Attachment: SOLR-9918.patch
> An UpdateRequestProcessor to skip duplicate inserts and ignore updates to
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15798416#comment-15798416
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9503:
Is anyone able to take a look at this fix - maybe [~noble.paul]? I hope
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15811200#comment-15811200
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9936:
Thanks - given the comment with the updateExecutor code and Yonik's reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9918:
---
Attachment: SOLR-9918.patch
> An UpdateRequestProcessor to skip duplicate inserts and ignore updates to
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15798916#comment-15798916
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9918:
Fair points Koji - I have updated the patch with a bit more documentation.
Tim Owen created SOLR-9936:
--
Summary: Allow configuration for recoveryExecutor thread pool size
Key: SOLR-9936
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9936
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9936:
---
Attachment: SOLR-9936.patch
> Allow configuration for recoveryExecutor thread pool size
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-9936:
---
Description:
There are two executor services in {{UpdateShardHandler}}, the
{{updateExecutor}} whose size is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15925821#comment-15925821
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-7191:
Admittedly not thousands of collections, but another anecdote. Each of our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-10826:
Attachment: SOLR-10826.patch
OK I've expanded the test a bit, it now creates a second collection, and alias
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-10826:
Attachment: SOLR-10826.patch
> CloudSolrClient using unsplit collection list when expanding aliases
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16066740#comment-16066740
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-10826:
-
Updated patch with some extra assertions. Without the code fix, those
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16061084#comment-16061084
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-10826:
-
Hi Varun, yes good point I will add some more tests for this code, next
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-10826:
Affects Version/s: 6.5.1
> CloudSolrClient using unsplit collection list when expanding aliases
>
Tim Owen created SOLR-10826:
---
Summary: CloudSolrClient using unsplit collection list when
expanding aliases
Key: SOLR-10826
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10826
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-10826:
Attachment: SOLR-10826.patch
> CloudSolrClient using unsplit collection list when expanding aliases
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16168150#comment-16168150
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-10826:
-
Hi - can this be backported to the 6.x branch? We're using it built
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-11765:
Attachment: SOLR-11765.patch
> Ability to Facet on a Function
> --
>
>
Tim Owen created SOLR-11765:
---
Summary: Ability to Facet on a Function
Key: SOLR-11765
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11765
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Security
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-11765:
Description:
This is an extension to the JSON facet functionality, to support faceting on a
function. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-11765:
Description:
This is an extension to the JSON facet functionality, to support faceting on a
function. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-7830:
---
Attachment: ALT-SOLR-7830.patch
> topdocs facet function
> --
>
> Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16495223#comment-16495223
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-7830:
I've attached a new patch, I took your original patch and updated it for
Tim Owen created SOLR-11832:
---
Summary: Restore from backup creates old format collections
Key: SOLR-11832
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11832
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-11832:
Attachment: SOLR-11832.patch
> Restore from backup creates old format collections
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-11832:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Restore from backup creates old format collections
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16321976#comment-16321976
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-11832:
-
[~varunthacker] .. yes it does appear to be the same issue as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16318139#comment-16318139
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-11832:
-
You're quite right Erick, my mistake.. that test class has been fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-11765:
Description:
This is an extension to the JSON facet functionality, to support faceting on a
function. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-11765:
Attachment: SOLR-11765.patch
> Ability to Facet on a Function
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16646482#comment-16646482
]
Tim Owen commented on LUCENE-7394:
--
Related to this (although I am happy to raise a separate Jira as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16746174#comment-16746174
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13029:
-
Sure - there's not a huge amount of code logic paths to test, but I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-13029:
Attachment: SOLR-13029.patch
> Allow HDFS backup/restore buffer size to be configured
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16749806#comment-16749806
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13029:
-
hah, I wasn't suggesting automating that.. just how I manually tested
Tim Owen created SOLR-13029:
---
Summary: Allow HDFS buffer size to be configured
Key: SOLR-13029
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-13029:
Attachment: SOLR-13029.patch
> Allow HDFS buffer size to be configured
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16705257#comment-16705257
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9961:
We considered using this patch locally, but actually found the problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16706976#comment-16706976
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13029:
-
Yes that's a fair point, I will change the patch so that it allows
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16711366#comment-16711366
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13029:
-
Updated to be specific to the copying of index files to/from HDFS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-13029:
Attachment: SOLR-13029.patch
> Allow HDFS buffer size to be configured
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-13029:
Summary: Allow HDFS backup/restore buffer size to be configured (was:
Allow HDFS buffer size to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16752109#comment-16752109
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13029:
-
Not sure - I can see someone might want parallelised file copies as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16752062#comment-16752062
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13029:
-
Thanks Mikhail!
> Allow HDFS backup/restore buffer size to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16826964#comment-16826964
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13240:
-
The one jar you're changing is solr-solrj .. you should find the new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16881143#comment-16881143
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13240:
-
Thanks for following up on this Christine.. updated patch looks good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16826788#comment-16826788
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13240:
-
At first glance, I think you should have used {{ant jar}} instead of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16827054#comment-16827054
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13240:
-
Good to hear the patch worked for you!
I'm not entirely sure in what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16886282#comment-16886282
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13240:
-
Yes it looks like the code fix has shown up other (autoscaling) tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16925451#comment-16925451
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13240:
-
Great! Thanks for all your work on this Christine
> UTILIZENODE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16900197#comment-16900197
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13539:
-
Not sure if it's a similar issue or not, but we're seeing this problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16900810#comment-16900810
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-13539:
-
Thanks Thomas, yes we're using 7.7.2 and having trouble, as we use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Owen updated SOLR-13539:
Attachment: SOLR-13539.patch
> Atomic Update Multivalue remove does not work for field types UUID, Enums,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16890751#comment-16890751
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9961:
Thanks.. yes indeed, we had to cherry pick the patch for that into our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16889969#comment-16889969
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9961:
Just curious if you tried increasing the copy buffer size as per
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16890015#comment-16890015
]
Tim Owen commented on SOLR-9961:
Thanks Mikhail, we're interested in your findings too, as we do backups
85 matches
Mail list logo
