I suggest backporting lucene-2328 as well
the memory leak grows based on the number of commits
if you are doing extremely frequent commits, the memory leak becomes a
sizable loss that cannot be reclaimed without restarting and may require
restarting the vm on a daily basis
-- Tim
On 10/29/
s (and not have to
port them to 3.0.3)
-- Tim
On 10/29/2010 01:35 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
I suggest backporting lucene-2328 as well
the memory leak grows based on the number of commits
if you are doing extremely frequent commits,
i created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2345 some time
ago proposing pretty much what seems to be discussed here
-- Tim
On 09/12/10 10:18, Simon Willnauer wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
Having hooks to enable an app to manage its own "ex
Tim Smith created LUCENE-4398:
-
Summary: "Memory Leak" in TermsHashPerField memory tracking
Key: LUCENE-4398
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4398
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13457151#comment-13457151
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4398:
---
More information:
I started tracking the me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13457196#comment-13457196
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4398:
---
Looks like the culpri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13457214#comment-13457214
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4398:
---
Found a easy "fix" for this:
comm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13457244#comment-13457244
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4398:
---
NOTE: 16 bytes of "unaccounted"
/index
Affects Versions: 3.0.3
Reporter: Tim Smith
waitForMerges can deadlock if a merge fails for ConcurrentMergeScheduler
this is because the merge thread will die, but pending merges are still
available
normally, the merge thread will pick up the next merge once it finishes the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13089674#comment-13089674
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-3373:
---
waitForMerges should continue to wait until
Tim Smith created LUCENE-4557:
-
Summary: Indexed Offsets Can Be Lost During Merge
Key: LUCENE-4557
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4557
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Smith updated LUCENE-4557:
--
Attachment: OffsetsTest.java
Attaching test that shows issue
> Indexed Offsets
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Smith reopened LUCENE-4557:
---
I disagree with that assessment
the problem here is not that offsets are not available on "old
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13497208#comment-13497208
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4557:
---
i understand the similarity to the omitTF
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13497278#comment-13497278
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4557:
---
i understand your aversion to what i sug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13497354#comment-13497354
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4557:
---
i know you aren't changing your min
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13497459#comment-13497459
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4557:
---
getSegmentForMerge could of course
Tim Smith created LUCENE-4560:
-
Summary: Support Filtering Segments During Merge
Key: LUCENE-4560
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4560
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13498079#comment-13498079
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4557:
---
Spun off LUCENE-4560 for supporting filte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Smith updated LUCENE-4560:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-4560.patch
Attaching patch
patch adds MergeSegmentFilter base class and adds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13498087#comment-13498087
]
Tim Smith edited comment on LUCENE-4560 at 11/15/12 4:0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Smith updated LUCENE-4560:
--
Lucene Fields: New,Patch Available (was: New)
> Support Filtering Segments During Me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1346#comment-1346
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4560:
---
My base requirement here is that this b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13500226#comment-13500226
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4560:
---
The "gradual" approach is very much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13500275#comment-13500275
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4560:
---
offsets can be used for highlighting
users
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13500291#comment-13500291
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4560:
---
bq. Its been this way since even 2.x, if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13500318#comment-13500318
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4560:
---
A migration strategy does exist and is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13500322#comment-13500322
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4560:
---
Uwe,
i plan to investigate your suggestions,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13537132#comment-13537132
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4560:
---
i found a 100% pure codec approach for provi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13537223#comment-13537223
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4560:
---
codec approach i'm taking is pretty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13537449#comment-13537449
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4272:
---
+1 on term vector approach
I would like to
Tim Smith created LUCENE-4671:
-
Summary: CharsRef.subSequence broken
Key: LUCENE-4671
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4671
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13548841#comment-13548841
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4671:
---
looks like the index out of bounds check is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Smith updated LUCENE-4671:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: looks like the index out of bounds check is a bit off too (if someone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13548843#comment-13548843
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4671:
---
looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13548848#comment-13548848
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-4671:
---
it is, that's why i deleted the comm
Components: Index
Affects Versions: 3.0.1
Reporter: Tim Smith
I'm seeing the following exception during indexing:
{code}
Caused by: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 14
at org.apache.lucene.index.ByteBlockPool.allocSlice(ByteBlockPool.java:11
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879382#action_12879382
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-2501:
---
thats what i was afraid of
i got this re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879403#action_12879403
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-2501:
---
Here's all the info i have available
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879422#action_12879422
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-2501:
---
Some more info:
ingestion is being performe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879483#action_12879483
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-2501:
---
Looks like this may be the original source of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879486#action_12879486
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-2501:
---
ram buffer size is set to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879489#action_12879489
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-2501:
---
will do
may take some time before it occurs a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12881675#action_12881675
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-2501:
---
I've been informed that this exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12888323#action_12888323
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-2276:
---
instead of doing the following everywhere:
{
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913097#action_12913097
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-2658:
---
Is this related to/same as LUCENE-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913140#action_12913140
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-2658:
---
sadly i haven't been able to gather the i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959096#comment-13959096
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5569:
---
-1
please don't do this
renaming thing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130121#comment-14130121
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5940:
---
i understand the desire for changing the po
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130138#comment-14130138
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5940:
---
5.0 should not be saddled with supporting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130149#comment-14130149
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5940:
---
time based would be much more reasonable
as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130151#comment-14130151
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5940:
---
"firefox" does not need to worry ab
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130169#comment-14130169
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5940:
---
i fully understand the pain associated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130218#comment-14130218
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5940:
---
the problem with the upgrade tool approac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130307#comment-14130307
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5940:
---
i would not consider old indexes not contai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130314#comment-14130314
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5940:
---
bq. Can you elaborate more? Your example o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130324#comment-14130324
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5940:
---
bq. Because you are not even considering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130333#comment-14130333
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5940:
---
bq. I don't care what happens on t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14131951#comment-14131951
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5940:
---
i fully understand the reasons for wantin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14140703#comment-14140703
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5940:
---
bq. Reindexing is part and parcel of searc
Tim Smith created LUCENE-5492:
-
Summary: IndexFileDeleter AssertionError in presence of
*_upgraded.si files
Key: LUCENE-5492
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5492
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13921398#comment-13921398
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5492:
---
to the best of my knowledge, i don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13921432#comment-13921432
]
Tim Smith edited comment on LUCENE-5492 at 3/5/14 9:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13921432#comment-13921432
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5492:
---
The following FileNotFound exception is fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13921452#comment-13921452
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5492:
---
FileNotFound was actually triggered later
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13922646#comment-13922646
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5492:
---
Narrowing it down
definitely seeing a refer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13922847#comment-13922847
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5492:
---
that seems to be the culprit
in my IndexWr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13923910#comment-13923910
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-5492:
---
Here's what my test is doing:
1. unpac
68 matches
Mail list logo
