Github user mkhludnev commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/ff8e841fa1b26875a95fd3ec67cd785649ba35b3#commitcomment-15792753
In solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/update/DeleteByQueryWrapper.java:
In solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/update
Github user mkhludnev commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/40#issuecomment-38898977
off-top. colleague of mine just send me the pic
.
But I rather prefer that the person who establish this API judges this
evolution, because he has plan or vision in mind.
Coming back
Github user mkhludnev commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/40#issuecomment-37409000
Terry,
Yep, passing Weight everywhere might be overwhelming. My case for
scorer.weight.query usage, is own drill-sideway facet collector. I run standard
Github user mkhludnev commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/40#issuecomment-37287237
Terry,
So far, cleanup in Boolean* classes seems good, but I have to mention that
the bunch of my custom queries need to distinguish scorers by obtaining Query
Github user mkhludnev commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/33#issuecomment-35233474
I like it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. To do so, please top-post your response
