[GitHub] [lucene-solr] diegoceccarelli commented on issue #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)

2019-09-03 Thread GitBox
diegoceccarelli commented on issue #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second grouping step 
if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#issuecomment-527619910
 
 
   I just pushed all my changes. Tests are successful, precommit is failing at 
the moment due to "Rat problems" - It seems to affect also the master, i'll 
check tomorrow. 
   Thanks for all the comments!


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[GitHub] [lucene-solr] diegoceccarelli commented on issue #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)

2019-08-02 Thread GitBox
diegoceccarelli commented on issue #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second grouping step 
if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#issuecomment-517760941
 
 
   @cpoerschke I rebased on top of the current master, please note that:
   
   1. I had to change the returned type of  `serializeOneSearchGroup` from 
`Object[]` to `Object` because `SkipSecondStepSearchResultResultTransformer` 
will return a `NamedList`
   
   2. I moved the check on `QueryComponent` cfd22cd (SOLR-12249) - ( when 
group.format=grouped then, validate group.offset) into 
`GroupingSpecification::validate`
   
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[GitHub] [lucene-solr] diegoceccarelli commented on issue #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)

2019-06-06 Thread GitBox
diegoceccarelli commented on issue #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second grouping step 
if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#issuecomment-499428055
 
 
   @cpoerschke I think I addressed all your comments, let me know if you have 
more comments :) 


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[GitHub] [lucene-solr] diegoceccarelli commented on issue #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)

2019-03-17 Thread GitBox
diegoceccarelli commented on issue #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second grouping step 
if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#issuecomment-473669645
 
 
   @cpoerschke Thanks!
   
   @cpoerschke @mjosephidou  I rebased the patch on top of the current master 
and applied @cpoerschke suggestions - precommit and unit tests succeeded. 
   
   One thing that I want to discuss and fix is the value of `numFound` for each 
group, at the moment is always 1 (I'm relying what written in the comments) - 
but in case of one shard or shards partitioned according to the grouping field, 
it might be possible to return the exact number. I would support that, what do 
you think?  at the same time, in case of multiple shards `numFound` will not be 
reliable, but `numFound` can't be disabled or requested, should we just write 
proper documentation for this behaviour? 


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org