Re: Fwd: Lucene/Solr 8.0
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:27 AM Cassandra Targett wrote: > I have a number of changes in a local branch for the 8.0 Ref Guide page > “Major Changes in Solr 8” about HTTP/2 which might help. I hadn’t intended > to push my branch, but I could if it helps. > About 30min ago I updated the release highlights for 8.0 to the Solr news.html. I took it off the updated wiki version (thanks to Dat for the updated HTTP/2 notes). We could update it further if you/anyone wants but I think it's fine now. It was not fine before. I also have a bunch of unfinished content I started about nested documents, > but tearing apart the CHANGES.txt to figure out what is new and how that > impacts upgrades is incredibly painful and time-consuming, and I don’t have > a ton of time these days. This is why the 8.0 Ref Guide isn’t out yet. > Maybe perfection is the enemy of good-enough here? Perfection might not be the right word... I sympathize it's tough to let go of an ideal. We want Solr and the Ref Guide to be the best it can be yet we only have so much time to do so. > Tangentially, I feel like we need to work something else out about Wiki > release notes (and, remember, wiki.apache.org is going away really soon > now) and the Ref Guide. It’s odd to me that one person decides how to > present what’s new in the Wiki release notes, and someone else decides how > to present a whole other set of content about the same set of features for > the Ref Guide. Usually I skip the what’s new part for the minor releases, > but for major ones, there needs to be a comprehensive “here’s what’s new > and what’s changed” - we’ve done it for 5->6 and 6->7, it’s part of the > major version process now. > Good point. Hmmm. Perhaps then the what's-new should be extracted from the ref guide and not authored in the wiki? The wiki could contain a template with a INSERT-HERE for the relevant part of the ref guide, since this is used as an announcement. Such a proposal means ensuring every release has its highlights in the ref guide, not just major ones. The "major-changes-in-solr-8.adoc" could become simply "changes-in-solr-8.adoc" with a "Major changes in 8.0" *section/heading*, and with a separate part enumerating minor releases. WDYT? At least then when working on a big issue I might at least add a place-holder to this page if not an actual highlight note. As an aside; I wonder what email client you use. In Gmail web view, your email doesn't wrap so I have to scroll horizontally, which sucks. ~ David > Anyway, let me know if you want to see what I have so far, and I’ll try to > find some time to push it or make a patch. > On Apr 30, 2019, 8:00 AM -0500, David Smiley , > wrote: > > Hi Dat, > > I plan to update Solr's release notes for 8.0 retroactively. > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 has more info on nested docs; > I wrote this well over a month ago. Can you please enhance the part on > HTTP2 to be more informative? For example... what *benefit* does HTTP2 > bring to internode communication? I know you benchmarked things. Maybe > mention the road to full HTTP2 continues into 8.x? > > I'm sending this to the dev list so really anyone else can help like list > other major features... though I think maybe it's just these two. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > -- Forwarded message - > From: David Smiley > Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0 > To: Solr/Lucene Dev > > > The Solr highlights section of the announcement is severely incomplete as > to appear embarrassing. > In the absence of time/effort to fix it should have simply been omitted; > the CHANGES.txt has details. > That would not have been embarrassing. > Maybe next time we could have a call to action about the release > highlights that coincides with the creation of the release branch; > that is a juncture in which the features are frozen and there's plenty of > time to update. > Last night I saw the call to action but it was woefully too late for me to > help. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:02 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> I organized existing items of the Lucene release notes into sections >> and added a new item about FeatureField, >> LongPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery and >> LatLonPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery. >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:54 PM Alan Woodward >> wrote: >> > >> > Jim and I have created wiki pages for the 8.0 release highlights here: >> > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 >> > https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote80 >> > >> > Feel free to edit and improve them - the Solr one in particular could >> do with some beefing up. >> > >> > >> > On 20 Feb 2019, at 11:37, Noble Paul wrote: >> > >> > I'm committing them, >> > Thanks Ishan >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:38 PM Alan Woodward >> wrote: >> > >> > >> >
Re: Fwd: Lucene/Solr 8.0
The docker hub stuff took a while since Solr 8 should have made it simpler but didn't completely. Some of the details are here: https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/issues/196 It looks like the README or Description didn't get updated even though the latest version is correct: https://hub.docker.com/_/solr Kevin Risden On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 2:06 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jason, > I now see docker hub synced up and is finally serving 8.0.0. This > happened, as per docker hub, "3 days ago". > Not sure why this delay (perhaps due to the security breach at docker > hub?). > Thanks for looking into this. > Regards, > Ishan > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:22 AM Jason Gerlowski > wrote: > > > > Are you sure Ishan? I just did a "docker pull solr" and it looks like > > I'm getting 8.0. Here's what I tried: https://pastebin.com/uPwCammc > > > > From the commit history here, maybe this is a recent change though? > > https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr > > > > Anyway, if you retry and still see 7.7.1, let me know and we can > > figure things out from there. > > > > On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 5:05 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > wrote: > > > > > > What should be done to get 8.0 version added to Docker Hub [0]? > > > Would this need to be done by Martijn Koster at Lucidworks? If so, can > > > someone please request him to take a look? > > > Or is this something that even we (@ Apache) can do too? > > > > > > [0] - https://hub.docker.com/_/solr/ > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:44 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On a different note, I realized 2 days back that the solr:latest on > > > > docker hub points to 7.7.1. What do we need to do to get 8.0 docker > > > > image on docker hub? > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:57 PM Cassandra Targett < > casstarg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I have a number of changes in a local branch for the 8.0 Ref Guide > page “Major Changes in Solr 8” about HTTP/2 which might help. I hadn’t > intended to push my branch, but I could if it helps. I also have a bunch of > unfinished content I started about nested documents, but tearing apart the > CHANGES.txt to figure out what is new and how that impacts upgrades is > incredibly painful and time-consuming, and I don’t have a ton of time these > days. This is why the 8.0 Ref Guide isn’t out yet. > > > > > > > > > > Tangentially, I feel like we need to work something else out about > Wiki release notes (and, remember, wiki.apache.org is going away really > soon now) and the Ref Guide. It’s odd to me that one person decides how to > present what’s new in the Wiki release notes, and someone else decides how > to present a whole other set of content about the same set of features for > the Ref Guide. Usually I skip the what’s new part for the minor releases, > but for major ones, there needs to be a comprehensive “here’s what’s new > and what’s changed” - we’ve done it for 5->6 and 6->7, it’s part of the > major version process now. > > > > > > > > > > Anyway, let me know if you want to see what I have so far, and > I’ll try to find some time to push it or make a patch. > > > > > On Apr 30, 2019, 8:00 AM -0500, David Smiley < > david.w.smi...@gmail.com>, wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dat, > > > > > > > > > > I plan to update Solr's release notes for 8.0 retroactively. > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 has more info on nested docs; > I wrote this well over a month ago. Can you please enhance the part on > HTTP2 to be more informative? For example... what *benefit* does HTTP2 > bring to internode communication? I know you benchmarked things. Maybe > mention the road to full HTTP2 continues into 8.x? > > > > > > > > > > I'm sending this to the dev list so really anyone else can help > like list other major features... though I think maybe it's just these two. > > > > > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > > > > > -- Forwarded message - > > > > > From: David Smiley > > > > > Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM > > > > > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0 > > > > > To: Solr/Lucene Dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Solr highlights section of the announcement is severely > incomplete as to appear embarrassing. > > > > > In the absence of time/effort to fix it should have simply been > omitted; the CHANGES.txt has details. > > > > > That would not have been embarrassing. > > > > > Maybe next time we could have a call to action about the release > highlights that coincides with the creation of the release branch; > > > > > that is a juncture in which the features are frozen and there's > plenty of time to update. > > > > > Last night I saw the call to action but it was woefully too late > for me to help. > > > > > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > >
Re: Fwd: Lucene/Solr 8.0
Hi David, I agree with Cassandra about using ref-guide for expressing our idea and our plan for a major version. But I also make some minor change to the wiki page about what we are gainning on switching to HTTP/2. On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 10:04 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > What should be done to get 8.0 version added to Docker Hub [0]? > Would this need to be done by Martijn Koster at Lucidworks? If so, can > someone please request him to take a look? > Or is this something that even we (@ Apache) can do too? > > [0] - https://hub.docker.com/_/solr/ > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:44 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > wrote: > > > > On a different note, I realized 2 days back that the solr:latest on > > docker hub points to 7.7.1. What do we need to do to get 8.0 docker > > image on docker hub? > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:57 PM Cassandra Targett > wrote: > > > > > > I have a number of changes in a local branch for the 8.0 Ref Guide > page “Major Changes in Solr 8” about HTTP/2 which might help. I hadn’t > intended to push my branch, but I could if it helps. I also have a bunch of > unfinished content I started about nested documents, but tearing apart the > CHANGES.txt to figure out what is new and how that impacts upgrades is > incredibly painful and time-consuming, and I don’t have a ton of time these > days. This is why the 8.0 Ref Guide isn’t out yet. > > > > > > Tangentially, I feel like we need to work something else out about > Wiki release notes (and, remember, wiki.apache.org is going away really > soon now) and the Ref Guide. It’s odd to me that one person decides how to > present what’s new in the Wiki release notes, and someone else decides how > to present a whole other set of content about the same set of features for > the Ref Guide. Usually I skip the what’s new part for the minor releases, > but for major ones, there needs to be a comprehensive “here’s what’s new > and what’s changed” - we’ve done it for 5->6 and 6->7, it’s part of the > major version process now. > > > > > > Anyway, let me know if you want to see what I have so far, and I’ll > try to find some time to push it or make a patch. > > > On Apr 30, 2019, 8:00 AM -0500, David Smiley , > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dat, > > > > > > I plan to update Solr's release notes for 8.0 retroactively. > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 has more info on nested docs; > I wrote this well over a month ago. Can you please enhance the part on > HTTP2 to be more informative? For example... what *benefit* does HTTP2 > bring to internode communication? I know you benchmarked things. Maybe > mention the road to full HTTP2 continues into 8.x? > > > > > > I'm sending this to the dev list so really anyone else can help like > list other major features... though I think maybe it's just these two. > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > -- Forwarded message - > > > From: David Smiley > > > Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM > > > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0 > > > To: Solr/Lucene Dev > > > > > > > > > The Solr highlights section of the announcement is severely incomplete > as to appear embarrassing. > > > In the absence of time/effort to fix it should have simply been > omitted; the CHANGES.txt has details. > > > That would not have been embarrassing. > > > Maybe next time we could have a call to action about the release > highlights that coincides with the creation of the release branch; > > > that is a juncture in which the features are frozen and there's plenty > of time to update. > > > Last night I saw the call to action but it was woefully too late for > me to help. > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:02 AM Adrien Grand > wrote: > > >> > > >> I organized existing items of the Lucene release notes into sections > > >> and added a new item about FeatureField, > > >> LongPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery and > > >> LatLonPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery. > > >> > > >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:54 PM Alan Woodward > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Jim and I have created wiki pages for the 8.0 release highlights > here: > > >> > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 > > >> > https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote80 > > >> > > > >> > Feel free to edit and improve them - the Solr one in particular > could do with some beefing up. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On 20 Feb 2019, at 11:37, Noble Paul wrote: > > >> > > > >> > I'm committing them, > > >> > Thanks Ishan > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:38 PM Alan Woodward > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Awesome, thank you Ishan! > > >> > > > >> > On 20 Feb 2019, at 09:15, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Would anyone like to volunteer to be release manager for 7.7.1? > > >> > > > >> > I
Re: Fwd: Lucene/Solr 8.0
Hi Jason, I now see docker hub synced up and is finally serving 8.0.0. This happened, as per docker hub, "3 days ago". Not sure why this delay (perhaps due to the security breach at docker hub?). Thanks for looking into this. Regards, Ishan On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:22 AM Jason Gerlowski wrote: > > Are you sure Ishan? I just did a "docker pull solr" and it looks like > I'm getting 8.0. Here's what I tried: https://pastebin.com/uPwCammc > > From the commit history here, maybe this is a recent change though? > https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr > > Anyway, if you retry and still see 7.7.1, let me know and we can > figure things out from there. > > On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 5:05 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > wrote: > > > > What should be done to get 8.0 version added to Docker Hub [0]? > > Would this need to be done by Martijn Koster at Lucidworks? If so, can > > someone please request him to take a look? > > Or is this something that even we (@ Apache) can do too? > > > > [0] - https://hub.docker.com/_/solr/ > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:44 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > wrote: > > > > > > On a different note, I realized 2 days back that the solr:latest on > > > docker hub points to 7.7.1. What do we need to do to get 8.0 docker > > > image on docker hub? > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:57 PM Cassandra Targett > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I have a number of changes in a local branch for the 8.0 Ref Guide page > > > > “Major Changes in Solr 8” about HTTP/2 which might help. I hadn’t > > > > intended to push my branch, but I could if it helps. I also have a > > > > bunch of unfinished content I started about nested documents, but > > > > tearing apart the CHANGES.txt to figure out what is new and how that > > > > impacts upgrades is incredibly painful and time-consuming, and I don’t > > > > have a ton of time these days. This is why the 8.0 Ref Guide isn’t out > > > > yet. > > > > > > > > Tangentially, I feel like we need to work something else out about Wiki > > > > release notes (and, remember, wiki.apache.org is going away really soon > > > > now) and the Ref Guide. It’s odd to me that one person decides how to > > > > present what’s new in the Wiki release notes, and someone else decides > > > > how to present a whole other set of content about the same set of > > > > features for the Ref Guide. Usually I skip the what’s new part for the > > > > minor releases, but for major ones, there needs to be a comprehensive > > > > “here’s what’s new and what’s changed” - we’ve done it for 5->6 and > > > > 6->7, it’s part of the major version process now. > > > > > > > > Anyway, let me know if you want to see what I have so far, and I’ll try > > > > to find some time to push it or make a patch. > > > > On Apr 30, 2019, 8:00 AM -0500, David Smiley > > > > , wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Dat, > > > > > > > > I plan to update Solr's release notes for 8.0 retroactively. > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 has more info on nested > > > > docs; I wrote this well over a month ago. Can you please enhance the > > > > part on HTTP2 to be more informative? For example... what *benefit* > > > > does HTTP2 bring to internode communication? I know you benchmarked > > > > things. Maybe mention the road to full HTTP2 continues into 8.x? > > > > > > > > I'm sending this to the dev list so really anyone else can help like > > > > list other major features... though I think maybe it's just these two. > > > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > > > -- Forwarded message - > > > > From: David Smiley > > > > Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM > > > > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0 > > > > To: Solr/Lucene Dev > > > > > > > > > > > > The Solr highlights section of the announcement is severely incomplete > > > > as to appear embarrassing. > > > > In the absence of time/effort to fix it should have simply been > > > > omitted; the CHANGES.txt has details. > > > > That would not have been embarrassing. > > > > Maybe next time we could have a call to action about the release > > > > highlights that coincides with the creation of the release branch; > > > > that is a juncture in which the features are frozen and there's plenty > > > > of time to update. > > > > Last night I saw the call to action but it was woefully too late for me > > > > to help. > > > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:02 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I organized existing items of the Lucene release notes into sections > > > >> and added a new item about FeatureField, > > > >> LongPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery and > > > >> LatLonPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery. > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:54 PM Alan Woodward > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > Jim and
Re: Fwd: Lucene/Solr 8.0
Are you sure Ishan? I just did a "docker pull solr" and it looks like I'm getting 8.0. Here's what I tried: https://pastebin.com/uPwCammc >From the commit history here, maybe this is a recent change though? https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr Anyway, if you retry and still see 7.7.1, let me know and we can figure things out from there. On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 5:05 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya wrote: > > What should be done to get 8.0 version added to Docker Hub [0]? > Would this need to be done by Martijn Koster at Lucidworks? If so, can > someone please request him to take a look? > Or is this something that even we (@ Apache) can do too? > > [0] - https://hub.docker.com/_/solr/ > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:44 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > wrote: > > > > On a different note, I realized 2 days back that the solr:latest on > > docker hub points to 7.7.1. What do we need to do to get 8.0 docker > > image on docker hub? > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:57 PM Cassandra Targett > > wrote: > > > > > > I have a number of changes in a local branch for the 8.0 Ref Guide page > > > “Major Changes in Solr 8” about HTTP/2 which might help. I hadn’t > > > intended to push my branch, but I could if it helps. I also have a bunch > > > of unfinished content I started about nested documents, but tearing apart > > > the CHANGES.txt to figure out what is new and how that impacts upgrades > > > is incredibly painful and time-consuming, and I don’t have a ton of time > > > these days. This is why the 8.0 Ref Guide isn’t out yet. > > > > > > Tangentially, I feel like we need to work something else out about Wiki > > > release notes (and, remember, wiki.apache.org is going away really soon > > > now) and the Ref Guide. It’s odd to me that one person decides how to > > > present what’s new in the Wiki release notes, and someone else decides > > > how to present a whole other set of content about the same set of > > > features for the Ref Guide. Usually I skip the what’s new part for the > > > minor releases, but for major ones, there needs to be a comprehensive > > > “here’s what’s new and what’s changed” - we’ve done it for 5->6 and 6->7, > > > it’s part of the major version process now. > > > > > > Anyway, let me know if you want to see what I have so far, and I’ll try > > > to find some time to push it or make a patch. > > > On Apr 30, 2019, 8:00 AM -0500, David Smiley , > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dat, > > > > > > I plan to update Solr's release notes for 8.0 retroactively. > > > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 has more info on nested docs; > > > I wrote this well over a month ago. Can you please enhance the part on > > > HTTP2 to be more informative? For example... what *benefit* does HTTP2 > > > bring to internode communication? I know you benchmarked things. Maybe > > > mention the road to full HTTP2 continues into 8.x? > > > > > > I'm sending this to the dev list so really anyone else can help like list > > > other major features... though I think maybe it's just these two. > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > -- Forwarded message - > > > From: David Smiley > > > Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM > > > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0 > > > To: Solr/Lucene Dev > > > > > > > > > The Solr highlights section of the announcement is severely incomplete as > > > to appear embarrassing. > > > In the absence of time/effort to fix it should have simply been omitted; > > > the CHANGES.txt has details. > > > That would not have been embarrassing. > > > Maybe next time we could have a call to action about the release > > > highlights that coincides with the creation of the release branch; > > > that is a juncture in which the features are frozen and there's plenty of > > > time to update. > > > Last night I saw the call to action but it was woefully too late for me > > > to help. > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:02 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > >> > > >> I organized existing items of the Lucene release notes into sections > > >> and added a new item about FeatureField, > > >> LongPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery and > > >> LatLonPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery. > > >> > > >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:54 PM Alan Woodward > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Jim and I have created wiki pages for the 8.0 release highlights here: > > >> > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 > > >> > https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote80 > > >> > > > >> > Feel free to edit and improve them - the Solr one in particular could > > >> > do with some beefing up. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On 20 Feb 2019, at 11:37, Noble Paul wrote: > > >> > > > >> > I'm committing them, > > >> > Thanks Ishan > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:38 PM Alan Woodward > > >> >
Re: Fwd: Lucene/Solr 8.0
What should be done to get 8.0 version added to Docker Hub [0]? Would this need to be done by Martijn Koster at Lucidworks? If so, can someone please request him to take a look? Or is this something that even we (@ Apache) can do too? [0] - https://hub.docker.com/_/solr/ On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:44 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya wrote: > > On a different note, I realized 2 days back that the solr:latest on > docker hub points to 7.7.1. What do we need to do to get 8.0 docker > image on docker hub? > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:57 PM Cassandra Targett > wrote: > > > > I have a number of changes in a local branch for the 8.0 Ref Guide page > > “Major Changes in Solr 8” about HTTP/2 which might help. I hadn’t intended > > to push my branch, but I could if it helps. I also have a bunch of > > unfinished content I started about nested documents, but tearing apart the > > CHANGES.txt to figure out what is new and how that impacts upgrades is > > incredibly painful and time-consuming, and I don’t have a ton of time these > > days. This is why the 8.0 Ref Guide isn’t out yet. > > > > Tangentially, I feel like we need to work something else out about Wiki > > release notes (and, remember, wiki.apache.org is going away really soon > > now) and the Ref Guide. It’s odd to me that one person decides how to > > present what’s new in the Wiki release notes, and someone else decides how > > to present a whole other set of content about the same set of features for > > the Ref Guide. Usually I skip the what’s new part for the minor releases, > > but for major ones, there needs to be a comprehensive “here’s what’s new > > and what’s changed” - we’ve done it for 5->6 and 6->7, it’s part of the > > major version process now. > > > > Anyway, let me know if you want to see what I have so far, and I’ll try to > > find some time to push it or make a patch. > > On Apr 30, 2019, 8:00 AM -0500, David Smiley , > > wrote: > > > > Hi Dat, > > > > I plan to update Solr's release notes for 8.0 retroactively. > > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 has more info on nested docs; I > > wrote this well over a month ago. Can you please enhance the part on HTTP2 > > to be more informative? For example... what *benefit* does HTTP2 bring to > > internode communication? I know you benchmarked things. Maybe mention the > > road to full HTTP2 continues into 8.x? > > > > I'm sending this to the dev list so really anyone else can help like list > > other major features... though I think maybe it's just these two. > > > > ~ David Smiley > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > -- Forwarded message - > > From: David Smiley > > Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM > > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0 > > To: Solr/Lucene Dev > > > > > > The Solr highlights section of the announcement is severely incomplete as > > to appear embarrassing. > > In the absence of time/effort to fix it should have simply been omitted; > > the CHANGES.txt has details. > > That would not have been embarrassing. > > Maybe next time we could have a call to action about the release highlights > > that coincides with the creation of the release branch; > > that is a juncture in which the features are frozen and there's plenty of > > time to update. > > Last night I saw the call to action but it was woefully too late for me to > > help. > > > > ~ David Smiley > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:02 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> > >> I organized existing items of the Lucene release notes into sections > >> and added a new item about FeatureField, > >> LongPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery and > >> LatLonPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery. > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:54 PM Alan Woodward wrote: > >> > > >> > Jim and I have created wiki pages for the 8.0 release highlights here: > >> > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 > >> > https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote80 > >> > > >> > Feel free to edit and improve them - the Solr one in particular could do > >> > with some beefing up. > >> > > >> > > >> > On 20 Feb 2019, at 11:37, Noble Paul wrote: > >> > > >> > I'm committing them, > >> > Thanks Ishan > >> > > >> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:38 PM Alan Woodward > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > Awesome, thank you Ishan! > >> > > >> > On 20 Feb 2019, at 09:15, Ishan Chattopadhyaya > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > Would anyone like to volunteer to be release manager for 7.7.1? > >> > > >> > I can volunteer for 7.7.1. I'll start as soon as both these issues are > >> > committed. > >> > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:18 PM Alan Woodward > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > We have two Solr issues that are serious enough to warrant a 7.7.1 > >> > release: SOLR-13248 and SOLR-13255. Given our backwards-compatibility > >> > guarantees, we should do this release before we restart the 8.0.0
Re: Fwd: Lucene/Solr 8.0
On a different note, I realized 2 days back that the solr:latest on docker hub points to 7.7.1. What do we need to do to get 8.0 docker image on docker hub? On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:57 PM Cassandra Targett wrote: > > I have a number of changes in a local branch for the 8.0 Ref Guide page > “Major Changes in Solr 8” about HTTP/2 which might help. I hadn’t intended to > push my branch, but I could if it helps. I also have a bunch of unfinished > content I started about nested documents, but tearing apart the CHANGES.txt > to figure out what is new and how that impacts upgrades is incredibly painful > and time-consuming, and I don’t have a ton of time these days. This is why > the 8.0 Ref Guide isn’t out yet. > > Tangentially, I feel like we need to work something else out about Wiki > release notes (and, remember, wiki.apache.org is going away really soon now) > and the Ref Guide. It’s odd to me that one person decides how to present > what’s new in the Wiki release notes, and someone else decides how to present > a whole other set of content about the same set of features for the Ref > Guide. Usually I skip the what’s new part for the minor releases, but for > major ones, there needs to be a comprehensive “here’s what’s new and what’s > changed” - we’ve done it for 5->6 and 6->7, it’s part of the major version > process now. > > Anyway, let me know if you want to see what I have so far, and I’ll try to > find some time to push it or make a patch. > On Apr 30, 2019, 8:00 AM -0500, David Smiley , > wrote: > > Hi Dat, > > I plan to update Solr's release notes for 8.0 retroactively. > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 has more info on nested docs; I > wrote this well over a month ago. Can you please enhance the part on HTTP2 > to be more informative? For example... what *benefit* does HTTP2 bring to > internode communication? I know you benchmarked things. Maybe mention the > road to full HTTP2 continues into 8.x? > > I'm sending this to the dev list so really anyone else can help like list > other major features... though I think maybe it's just these two. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > -- Forwarded message - > From: David Smiley > Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0 > To: Solr/Lucene Dev > > > The Solr highlights section of the announcement is severely incomplete as to > appear embarrassing. > In the absence of time/effort to fix it should have simply been omitted; the > CHANGES.txt has details. > That would not have been embarrassing. > Maybe next time we could have a call to action about the release highlights > that coincides with the creation of the release branch; > that is a juncture in which the features are frozen and there's plenty of > time to update. > Last night I saw the call to action but it was woefully too late for me to > help. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:02 AM Adrien Grand wrote: >> >> I organized existing items of the Lucene release notes into sections >> and added a new item about FeatureField, >> LongPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery and >> LatLonPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery. >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:54 PM Alan Woodward wrote: >> > >> > Jim and I have created wiki pages for the 8.0 release highlights here: >> > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 >> > https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote80 >> > >> > Feel free to edit and improve them - the Solr one in particular could do >> > with some beefing up. >> > >> > >> > On 20 Feb 2019, at 11:37, Noble Paul wrote: >> > >> > I'm committing them, >> > Thanks Ishan >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:38 PM Alan Woodward wrote: >> > >> > >> > Awesome, thank you Ishan! >> > >> > On 20 Feb 2019, at 09:15, Ishan Chattopadhyaya >> > wrote: >> > >> > Would anyone like to volunteer to be release manager for 7.7.1? >> > >> > I can volunteer for 7.7.1. I'll start as soon as both these issues are >> > committed. >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:18 PM Alan Woodward wrote: >> > >> > >> > We have two Solr issues that are serious enough to warrant a 7.7.1 >> > release: SOLR-13248 and SOLR-13255. Given our backwards-compatibility >> > guarantees, we should do this release before we restart the 8.0.0 process. >> > >> > Would anyone like to volunteer to be release manager for 7.7.1? Ideally >> > we would get this done quickly so that I can continue releasing 8.0.0. >> > >> > On 14 Feb 2019, at 20:37, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:08 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: >> > >> > >> > Thank you, Alan. Give me an hour. >> > >> > чт, 14 февр. 2019 г., 20:59 Alan Woodward romseyg...@gmail.com: >> > >> > >> > OK, let’s do an RC2. When do you think you can have a fix in? >> > >> > Mikhail, will you be able to get your fix in soon as well? >> > >>
Re: Fwd: Lucene/Solr 8.0
I have a number of changes in a local branch for the 8.0 Ref Guide page “Major Changes in Solr 8” about HTTP/2 which might help. I hadn’t intended to push my branch, but I could if it helps. I also have a bunch of unfinished content I started about nested documents, but tearing apart the CHANGES.txt to figure out what is new and how that impacts upgrades is incredibly painful and time-consuming, and I don’t have a ton of time these days. This is why the 8.0 Ref Guide isn’t out yet. Tangentially, I feel like we need to work something else out about Wiki release notes (and, remember, wiki.apache.org is going away really soon now) and the Ref Guide. It’s odd to me that one person decides how to present what’s new in the Wiki release notes, and someone else decides how to present a whole other set of content about the same set of features for the Ref Guide. Usually I skip the what’s new part for the minor releases, but for major ones, there needs to be a comprehensive “here’s what’s new and what’s changed” - we’ve done it for 5->6 and 6->7, it’s part of the major version process now. Anyway, let me know if you want to see what I have so far, and I’ll try to find some time to push it or make a patch. On Apr 30, 2019, 8:00 AM -0500, David Smiley , wrote: > Hi Dat, > > I plan to update Solr's release notes for 8.0 retroactively. > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 has more info on nested docs; I > wrote this well over a month ago. Can you please enhance the part on HTTP2 > to be more informative? For example... what *benefit* does HTTP2 bring to > internode communication? I know you benchmarked things. Maybe mention the > road to full HTTP2 continues into 8.x? > > I'm sending this to the dev list so really anyone else can help like list > other major features... though I think maybe it's just these two. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > -- Forwarded message - > > From: David Smiley > > Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM > > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0 > > To: Solr/Lucene Dev > > > > > > The Solr highlights section of the announcement is severely incomplete as > > to appear embarrassing. > > In the absence of time/effort to fix it should have simply been omitted; > > the CHANGES.txt has details. > > That would not have been embarrassing. > > Maybe next time we could have a call to action about the release highlights > > that coincides with the creation of the release branch; > > that is a juncture in which the features are frozen and there's plenty of > > time to update. > > Last night I saw the call to action but it was woefully too late for me to > > help. > > > > ~ David Smiley > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:02 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > I organized existing items of the Lucene release notes into sections > > > > and added a new item about FeatureField, > > > > LongPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery and > > > > LatLonPoint#newDistanceFeatureQuery. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:54 PM Alan Woodward > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Jim and I have created wiki pages for the 8.0 release highlights here: > > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote80 > > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote80 > > > > > > > > > > Feel free to edit and improve them - the Solr one in particular could > > > > > do with some beefing up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 20 Feb 2019, at 11:37, Noble Paul wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I'm committing them, > > > > > Thanks Ishan > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:38 PM Alan Woodward > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Awesome, thank you Ishan! > > > > > > > > > > On 20 Feb 2019, at 09:15, Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Would anyone like to volunteer to be release manager for 7.7.1? > > > > > > > > > > I can volunteer for 7.7.1. I'll start as soon as both these issues > > > > > are committed. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:18 PM Alan Woodward > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have two Solr issues that are serious enough to warrant a 7.7.1 > > > > > release: SOLR-13248 and SOLR-13255. Given our > > > > > backwards-compatibility guarantees, we should do this release before > > > > > we restart the 8.0.0 process. > > > > > > > > > > Would anyone like to volunteer to be release manager for 7.7.1? > > > > > Ideally we would get this done quickly so that I can continue > > > > > releasing 8.0.0. > > > > > > > > > > On 14 Feb 2019, at 20:37, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:08 PM Mikhail Khludnev > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, Alan. Give me an hour. > > > > > > > > > > чт, 14 февр. 2019 г., 20:59 Alan Woodward romseyg...@gmail.com: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, let’s do an RC2.
