I modified the Solr release notes to mention the faceting bug as well,
since it was bad enough to cause us to respin.
Le ven. 22 janv. 2016 à 04:40, Shawn Heisey a écrit :
> On 1/21/2016 8:14 PM, Michael Froh wrote:
> > Should the Solr release notes reference the additional
Thanks Adrien for doing the release!
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> I modified the Solr release notes to mention the faceting bug as well,
> since it was bad enough to cause us to respin.
>
> Le ven. 22 janv. 2016 à 04:40, Shawn Heisey
Thanks all for voting. This vote has passed, I will start releasing these
artifacts now.
I haven't had much feedback about the release notes. If someone could just
check them out to make sure they make sense, I would appreciate:
- http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote541
-
Should the Solr release notes reference the additional fixes that went in
there?
>From your email to start the thread:
- SOLR-8496: multi-select faceting and getDocSet(List) can match
deleted docs
- SOLR-8418: Adapt to changes in LUCENE-6590 for use of boosts with
MLTHandler and
On 1/21/2016 8:14 PM, Michael Froh wrote:
> Should the Solr release notes reference the additional fixes that went
> in there?
>
> From your email to start the thread:
>
> - SOLR-8496: multi-select faceting and getDocSet(List) can
> match deleted docs
> - SOLR-8418: Adapt to changes in
+1 on java 7
SUCCESS! [1:50:00.109516]
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
> +1
> SUCCESS! [1:50:21.498224]
>
> On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 1:28 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> wrote:
>
>
>
> +1
> SUCCESS! [1:27:55.987215]
>
>
+1
SUCCESS! [1:50:21.498224]
On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 1:28 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe
wrote:
+1
SUCCESS! [1:27:55.987215]
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
+1
>
>-Yonik
>
>
>On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Adrien
+1
-Yonik
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.4.1
>
> This release candidate contains 3 additional changes compared to the RC1:
> - SOLR-8496: multi-select faceting and getDocSet(List) can match
>
+1
SUCCESS! [0:49:41.000169]
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.4.1
>
> This release candidate contains 3 additional changes compared to the RC1:
> - SOLR-8496: multi-select faceting and
+1 SUCCESS! [0:55:22.954147]
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> +1
>
> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>
> Smoke tester with Java7 and Java8:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:48:02.638363]
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>> On Jan 18, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Ramkumar R.
+1
SUCCESS! [1:27:55.987215]
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> +1
>
> -Yonik
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.4.1
> >
> > This release candidate
+1
Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
Smoke tester with Java7 and Java8:
SUCCESS! [0:48:02.638363]
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Ramkumar R. Aiyengar
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:56:50.593184]
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:19
Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.4.1
This release candidate contains 3 additional changes compared to the RC1:
- SOLR-8496: multi-select faceting and getDocSet(List) can match
deleted docs
- SOLR-8418: Adapt to changes in LUCENE-6590 for use of boosts with
MLTHandler
+1
SUCCESS! [0:31:26.635824]
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.4.1
>
> This release candidate contains 3 additional changes compared to the RC1:
+1
SUCCESS! [1:11:14.331645]
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.4.1
>
> This release candidate contains 3 additional changes compared to the RC1:
> - SOLR-8496: multi-select faceting and
+1
SUCCESS! [0:42:55.587563]
So I see I'm between Mike and Shalin in terms of how fast my machine goes
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [1:11:14.331645]
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Adrien Grand
+1
SUCCESS! [0:56:50.593184]
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:42:55.587563]
>
> So I see I'm between Mike and Shalin in terms of how fast my machine
> goes
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>
17 matches
Mail list logo