Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-06 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
+1 SUCCESS! [0:34:40.873023] On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Nicholas Knize wrote: > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3 > > Smoke te

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-05 Thread Joel Bernstein
+1 SUCCESS! [0:57:25.723824] Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > SUCCESS! [0:46:58.614256] > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Ahmet Arslan > wrote: > >> >> >> +1 >> SUCCESS! [1:42:49.802039]

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-05 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
+1 SUCCESS! [0:46:58.614256] On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > > > +1 > SUCCESS! [1:42:49.802039] > Ahmet > > > On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:09 AM, Anshum Gupta > wrote: > > > > Thanks for taking this up Nick! > > Here's my +1: > > SUCCESS! [0:38:14.023246] > > > > On Fri, Ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-04 Thread Ahmet Arslan
+1 SUCCESS! [1:42:49.802039] Ahmet On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:09 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote: Thanks for taking this up Nick! Here's my +1: SUCCESS! [0:38:14.023246] On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote: Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-04 Thread Anshum Gupta
Thanks for taking this up Nick! Here's my +1: SUCCESS! [0:38:14.023246] On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote: > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-04 Thread Steve Rowe
+1 Docs, changes and javadocs look good, except that there is a 5.5.1 section in Solr’s CHANGES.txt, but there shouldn’t be (shouldn’t block release, IMO). Smoke tester: SUCCESS! [0:24:05.242799] -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Apr 1, 2016, at 4:44 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote: > > Please vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-04 Thread Michael McCandless
+1 SUCCESS! [0:33:01.168718] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote: > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c8

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-04 Thread Steve Rowe
FYI there is a reproducing failure in lucene/spatial on branch_6_0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7172 -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Apr 1, 2016, at 4:44 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote: > > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > > h

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-04 Thread Steve Rowe
Aha, I bet this is related to SOLR-8724 (upgrade Solr to Zookeeper 3.4.8) - I was using locally compiled jars of 3.4.6 with extra debug printing, not sure how/why it made it to my Ivy cache, but I’m clearing it and restarting the smoke tester. Sorry for the noise. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-04 Thread Steve Rowe
I got a dependency checksum failure when I ran the smoke tester, which is weird, since others have already succeeded, and I would think that the test is deterministic… I’m looking into it: —— check-licenses: [echo] License check under: /tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.0_48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd5

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-03 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Jack > Adding this less-controversial point: > > 5. It should have been stated explicitly that Java 1.9 is not supported at > this time. I am not sure why you want to have this in the release notes. This is completely irrelevant: - Java 9 is not yet released, so nobody would use it in produ

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-03 Thread Jack Krupansky
-0 for my previous reasons: 1. The new points feature should have been treated as experimental in 6.0. 2. The rest of Lucene should not have been switched over to this largely unbaked, experimental points feature so soon. 3. The current 5.x numerics should not have been deprecated so soon, with th

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-02 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
Hi, I'm not sure what I'm doing, but SUCCESS! [1:55:30.799304] On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote: > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-02 Thread Martijn v Groningen
+1 Thanks for doing this Nick! SUCCESS! [0:40:21.687836] On 1 April 2016 at 22:44, Nicholas Knize wrote: > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

2016-04-01 Thread Nicholas Knize
Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3 Smoke tester: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lu