Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

SOLR-10711. Do you >>>>>> consider it as a blocker? If so, can we mark it as such on the JIRA? Is >>>>>> there an issue for the Windows space issue? >>>>>> As for SOLR-10004, I don't think it is a release blocker; however a >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:is...@apache.org] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 17, 2017 3:50 PM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1 > > > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 > > > > The artifacts can be dow

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

so, can we mark it as such on the JIRA? Is >>>>> there an issue for the Windows space issue? >>>>> As for SOLR-10004, I don't think it is a release blocker; however a >>>>> nice one to fix before the re-spin, if possible. I'd be glad to >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

on the JIRA? Is >>>> there an issue for the Windows space issue? >>>> As for SOLR-10004, I don't think it is a release blocker; however a >>>> nice one to fix before the re-spin, if possible. I'd be glad to reconsider, >>>> if someone thinks oth

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

t 6:40 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The "javadocs want to fail" output sounds like >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10004 ticket. >>>> >>>> From: dev@lucene.apache.or

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

017 at 6:40 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) >> wrote: >> >>> The "javadocs want to fail" output sounds like >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10004 ticket. >>> >>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 05/17/17 18:44:36 >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

t; > cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > >> The "javadocs want to fail" output sounds like >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10004 ticket. >> >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 05/17/17 18:44:36 >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subj

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

ike https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/SOLR-10004 ticket. > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 05/17/17 18:44:36 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1 > > The smoke tester ended with: > > SUCCESS! [0:59:34.797969] > > However,

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

The "javadocs want to fail" output sounds like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10004 ticket. From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 05/17/17 18:44:36 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1 The smoke tester ended with: SUCCESS! [0:59:34.797969

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 3:50 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1 Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.6

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Ishan, I went ahead and merged to branch_6_6. If we were to decide to not respin I'll update the changes entry to move it to 6.6.1. Le jeu. 18 mai 2017 à 18:02, David Smiley a écrit : > > The fix looks low risk so I'd probably respin for it given there are > many users of block joins I think, >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

> The fix looks low risk so I'd probably respin for it given there are many users of block joins I think, +1 to incorporate and respin. Better to do this for newly found bugs than have yet another bugfix release. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:16 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > Ishan, a bug about scoring

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Ishan, a bug about scoring block join queries was just reported yesterday: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7833. The fix looks low risk so I'd probably respin for it given there are many users of block joins I think, but I'll leave it up to you as a release manager. We can also do a bu

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

informal +1 - just fired up this RC1 and all was well with the payload support (SOLR-1485) with my use-case scripts. Erik > On May 17, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

> Something strange with the links in this message. They refer to both 6.6.0 and 6.5.0 ? It seems my copy paste of Joel's 6.5 announcement mail didn't affect the hyperlink, just pasted the text. I wish GMail was smarter. Here's the correct contents again: Please vote for release candidate 1 for

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

The smoke tester ended with: SUCCESS! [0:59:34.797969] However, after looking at some of its output, I see a: ***WARNING***: javadocs want to fail! Which followed many "missing: ..." messages akin to this: unpack solr-6.6.0-src.tgz... make sure no JARs/WARs in src dist... run "ant

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

On Wed, 17 May 2017, Ishan Chattopadhyaya wrote: Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.6.0-RC1-rev4d055f00bba9a745737e4b6c3f9dff06dd35aa2e

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

For some reason, the artifacts didn't have the Lucene's .asc files copied over from the working directory to the artifact directory. The Solr ones were there. I copied them manually, and the smoke tester was happy again. I'll look into it as to why that could've happened. The raw logs (/tmp/release

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.6.0-RC1-rev4d055f00bba9a745737e4b6c3f9dff06dd35aa2e