[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4880) Difference in offset handling between IndexReader created by MemoryIndex and one created by RAMDirectory

2013-04-24 Thread Tim Allison (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13640816#comment-13640816 ] Tim Allison commented on LUCENE-4880: - Thank you! Difference in

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4880) Difference in offset handling between IndexReader created by MemoryIndex and one created by RAMDirectory

2013-03-26 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13614073#comment-13614073 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4880: - Thanks for raising this Timothy. I think its

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4880) Difference in offset handling between IndexReader created by MemoryIndex and one created by RAMDirectory

2013-03-26 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13614080#comment-13614080 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4880: --- Yes, I this is a bug in MemoryIndex. In

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4880) Difference in offset handling between IndexReader created by MemoryIndex and one created by RAMDirectory

2013-03-26 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13614086#comment-13614086 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4880: - I also think its stupid you get 0640 as a