[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7490) Update by query feature

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14523222#comment-14523222 ] Praneeth commented on SOLR-7490: Yes. I do understand that atomic updates require the

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7490) Update by query feature

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14521907#comment-14521907 ] Praneeth commented on SOLR-7490: Thanks for the points. Its true that the all the document

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7490) Update by query feature

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14522198#comment-14522198 ] Praneeth commented on SOLR-7490: Ya but isn't update also effectively a mark for delete and

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7490) Update by query feature

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14522109#comment-14522109 ] Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-7490: -- bq: Would this be significantly more work for

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7490) Update by query feature

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14522371#comment-14522371 ] Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-7490: -- bq: Considering a query that qualifies

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7490) Update by query feature

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14520812#comment-14520812 ] Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-7490: -- Problem here is that you don't necessarily