[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Steven Rowe resolved LUCENE-2544.
---------------------------------

       Resolution: Won't Fix
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 4.1)
    Lucene Fields:   (was: New)

Given the fact that this just provides sugar over existing functionality, and 
considering [~thetaphiā€¨]'s objections, and the two years with zero activity, 
resolving as Won't Fix.
                
> Add 'divisor' to NumericField, allows for easy storage of full precision 
> data, but indexing *starting* at lower precision.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2544
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2544
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core/other
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.2
>            Reporter: Woody Anderson
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2544.patch
>
>
> In some cases, we want to index a timestamp or some other high precision 
> numeric at a much lower precision, but we still want to store the full 
> precision data.
> Rather than have to do this with two Field objects in the Document, it'd be 
> easier to provide NumericField with a divisor as well as prevision step. The 
> divisor would apply before beginning the trie logic.
> most often, this is a divide by 1, but that will happen only during the 
> constructor or setXXXValue() in NumericTokenStream.
> I have the patch for this, or i will after i isolate it.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to