: Thanks; I can definitely appreciate that Watchers (or more generally the
: idea of chaining async callbacks) is usually a more suitable mechanism than
: calling sync(). I've also seen some code patterns in which knowledge of
To be clear: i'm not suggesting that we *don't* need sync() calls
data in Solr that would require syncs?
>
> : Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 21:16:41 +
> : From: David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
> : Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> : To: "dev@lucene.apache.org" <dev@lucene.apache.org>
> : Subject: FYI Zookeeper.sync()
cene.apache.org" <dev@lucene.apache.org>
: Subject: FYI Zookeeper.sync()
:
: As I was contemplating how it is that I see some weird behavior while
: working on SolrCloud stuff could happen, I started to question my basic
: assumptions. One assumption I held is that SolrZkClient.getData (which
: calls
As I was contemplating how it is that I see some weird behavior while
working on SolrCloud stuff could happen, I started to question my basic
assumptions. One assumption I held is that SolrZkClient.getData (which
calls ZooKeeper.getData) would always return the most up to date
information from
