I will probably submit a patch to RAT at some point for this, but wanted to
prove it out here first as we have an immediate need and I don't want to wait
for a RAT release nor do I have the time to learn the RAT code at this point.
Others are welcome to port it.
-Grant
On Mar 17, 2011, at
As Robert can no doubt attest, we often scramble to make sure i's are dotted
and t's are crossed when it comes to filling out LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
right before releases, thereby burdening the RM with way too much work in
validating what dependency has which license. Thus, we've been
We do use Apache RAT and it does not do these kinds of license checks.
On Mar 16, 2011, at 9:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Have you guys thought about using Apache RAT [1]?
It's not perfect but it implements a lot of license checks, and as far as I
know, integrates nicely into Ant
