I think it can be a subtask of LUCENE-3079 and we should first focus on the
general faceting features. As far as I know there is no bitset impl. out
there for faceting.
Op 14 jun. 2011 00:08 schreef Jason Rutherglen jason.rutherg...@gmail.com
het volgende:
Martijn, If the title is correct Post
Are we going the direction of creating full facet features outside of
Solr? Eg, we have UIF extrapolated out, we can probably make a module
for bit set intersections as well. In the process the faceting will
go per-segment.
-
I believe people are already looking into that but I am not sure.
sounds reasonable to me but I think its going to be lots of work
simon
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Are we going the direction of creating full facet features outside of
I think it's a better approach than rewriting Solr's internals. Eg,
small development steps could be taken, using the knowledge learned
from Solr's facet system. Eg, caching and intersecting bit sets would
be an easy-ish first step?
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Simon Willnauer
There is already an issue open for this:
LUCENE-3079
As the issues describes, the faceting in Solr relies on the schema (and off
course the UIF).
So having the noting of a FieldType in the facet module would be very
helpful for selecting the right facet implementation.
Currently in Solr there is
Martijn, If the title is correct Post grouping faceting then maybe
the bit set based system should be a separate issue? Eg, is there a
bit set implementation today in LUCENE-3079?
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Martijn v Groningen
martijn.is.h...@gmail.com wrote:
There is already an issue
