[TeamCity, FAILED] Build Lucene.NET :: Lucene.NET Core [master] #537

2016-01-14 Thread TeamCity at Codebetter
Build Lucene.NET :: Lucene.NET Core [master] #537 failed (Tests failed: 1, passed: 2461, ignored: 107). Agent: JetBrains-dotnet-agent02 Build results: http://teamcity.codebetter.com/viewLog.html?buildId=207689=LuceneNet_Core Failed Tests Summary: Failed tests (1 test, alphabetically ordered)

[GitHub] lucenenet pull request: Port of CharTokenizer, other code it depen...

2016-01-14 Thread synhershko
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/159#discussion_r49704493 --- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Analysis.Common/Analysis/Core/LetterTokenizer.cs --- @@ -75,10 +75,10 @@ public LetterTokenizer(LuceneVersion matchVersion,

[TeamCity, FAILED] Build Lucene.NET :: Lucene.NET Nightly [master] #537

2016-01-14 Thread TeamCity at Codebetter
Build Lucene.NET :: Lucene.NET Nightly [master] #537 failed (Tests failed: 85 (4 new), passed: 2813, ignored: 117; snapshot dependency failed: ... Lucene.NET Core). Agent: JetBrains-dotnet-agent02 Build results:

[GitHub] lucenenet pull request: Port of CharTokenizer, other code it depen...

2016-01-14 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/159 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[TeamCity, SUCCESSFUL] Build Lucene.NET :: Lucene.NET Core Focused Tests [master] #135

2016-01-14 Thread TeamCity at Codebetter
Build Lucene.NET :: Lucene.NET Core Focused Tests [master] #135 successful . Agent: JetBrains-dotnet-agent02 Build results: http://teamcity.codebetter.com/viewLog.html?buildId=207690=LuceneNet_LuceneNetCoreFailingTests Changes included (1 change)

[GitHub] lucenenet pull request: Port CharArrayIterator

2016-01-14 Thread laimis
Github user laimis commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/157#issuecomment-171626312 @synhershko yeah I went ahead and merged it to continue with the porting as this was a building block on some of the next ports I was doing. I waited a bit longer but