[GitHub] lucenenet pull request #178: Ported Core.Codecs.Perfield.TestPerFieldPosting...

2016-08-07 Thread NightOwl888
GitHub user NightOwl888 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/178 Ported Core.Codecs.Perfield.TestPerFieldPostingsFormat2 Ported the Core.Codecs.Perfield.TestPerFieldPostingsFormat2 tests and removed [Test] attribute from a couple of methods where it

[GitHub] lucenenet issue #175: IndexableField API Consistency Fix

2016-08-07 Thread NightOwl888
Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/175 Ok, I did a search of all of the files in this project for these method names. I only found one other file that referenced any of these fields, and it was in a project that (apparently)

[GitHub] lucenenet issue #176: Ported QueryParser

2016-08-07 Thread NightOwl888
Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/176 > This is usually where we put all .NET specific stuff that is required by Core / subprojects: > https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/tree/master/src/Lucene.Net.Core/Support/Compatibility

[GitHub] lucenenet issue #176: Ported QueryParser

2016-08-07 Thread synhershko
Github user synhershko commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/176 This is usually where we put all .NET specific stuff that is required by Core / subprojects: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/tree/master/src/Lucene.Net.Core/Support/Compatibility

[GitHub] lucenenet pull request #:

2016-08-07 Thread synhershko
Github user synhershko commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/commit/c6f1a19af68a405b428f935118665f65fefad491#commitcomment-18551289 Please mark as LUCENENET specific if that's the case --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and

[GitHub] lucenenet issue #176: Ported QueryParser

2016-08-07 Thread NightOwl888
Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/176 Another correction - the Lucene.Net 3.0.3 code had a bug. When passing `0`, it would format the boost as `^.0`, but if you passed `0.123` you would get `^0.123`. I checked through