RE: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 4.8.0-beta00001

Itamar, Thanks for your valuable opinion, but I respectfully disagree. The main purpose of getting this into the wild is so we can turn the trickle of bug reports and pull requests into a flood. We know there are bugs (there are still at least a dozen flakey tests, some of them concurrency

Re: Encrypting Index files

We are doing that in RavenDB. This is pretty complex, because you need to make sure that the on disk data is encrypted but seekable. Note that for in memory data, you can't encrypt anything. *Hibernating Rhinos Ltd * Oren Eini* l CEO l *Mobile: + 972-52-548-6969 Office: +972-4-622-7811 *l

[GitHub] lucenenet issue #205: Made FSDirectory stale files set synchronized.

Github user synhershko commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205 This is a great test - and as it happens many bugs in Apache Lucene (Java), even very severe ones, were caught using a randomized testing framework, which by definition is not deterministic.

RE: Encrypting Index files

Sri, As Lucene.Net is a port of Lucene the plan is not to add any additional features that don't exist in Java Lucene (other than perhaps features that might make usage with .NET easier). Search functionality is expected to be fast and encryption would certainly slow it down. In general, I

Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 4.8.0-beta00001

Lazaro, you can send an email to dev-unsubscr...@lucenenet.apache.org from your subscribed email to unsubscribe. From: Lazaro Fernandes Lima Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 6:45:39 AM To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache

RE: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 4.8.0-beta00001

Looks like we need my vote to make this happen +1. -Original Message- From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com] Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2017 7:15 AM To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 4.8.0-beta1 So, after 4 1/2 years of silence, we are ready to

Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 4.8.0-beta00001

unsubscribe, please 2017-05-08 10:40 GMT-03:00 John Duerden : > Downloaded and ran beta on a site I support - worked fine. > > Not sure my vote counts but +1 here and thanks for all the work. > > John Duerden > > On 5 May 2017 at 18:15, Shad Storhaug

Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 4.8.0-beta00001

Downloaded and ran beta on a site I support - worked fine. Not sure my vote counts but +1 here and thanks for all the work. John Duerden On 5 May 2017 at 18:15, Shad Storhaug wrote: > So, after 4 1/2 years of silence, we are ready to shake up the world with > a new

[GitHub] lucenenet issue #205: Made FSDirectory stale files set synchronized.

Github user pvginkel commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205 I have, but this is a problematic one. This depends on a race condition, which is non-deterministic by definition. The test case I created runs a few threads for a few seconds and fails

[GitHub] lucenenet issue #205: Made FSDirectory stale files set synchronized.

Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205 @pvginkel Could you add a test to this PR in the [TestDirectory

[GitHub] lucenenet issue #205: Made FSDirectory stale files set synchronized.

Github user pvginkel commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205 I am currently working around this using reflection, so for me it's fine. However, this is causing real problems. I wrote a prototype which is indexing using 4 threads, a thread that

[GitHub] lucenenet issue #205: Made FSDirectory stale files set synchronized.

Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205 @synhershko Not without cancelling the vote and starting over (for the 3rd time) - we have only 12 hours left on the current vote. I suspect there will be several issues such as

[GitHub] lucenenet issue #205: Made FSDirectory stale files set synchronized.

Github user synhershko commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205 Good catch, thanks! @NightOwl888 can we get this to the beta version before it's released? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

[GitHub] lucenenet pull request #205: Made FSDirectory stale files set synchronized.

GitHub user pvginkel opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205 Made FSDirectory stale files set synchronized. `FSDirectory` has a hash set to track stale files. In the original Lucene source at e.g.