Github user synhershko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/191
Thanks for the clarifications. Probably make sense to have it documented in
code itself then :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/191
> >There are 2 different PriorityQueue types in Lucene.Net
> Is there a reason for this? Can we stay with one?
Yes, there is a reason for that â that is the way it is
Github user synhershko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/191
> AFAIK, the Support namespace is for pieces that need to be sourced from
the JDK and/or close approximations to what is in the JDK that don't exist in
the .NET framework.
This is
Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/191
FYI - There are 2 branches that still need to be integrated before this is
up to date with master:
- https://github.com/NightOwl888/lucenenet/tree/core-tests
-
