[GitHub] lucenenet issue #195: Moving ICU dependent classes into a separate project

2016-11-24 Thread laimis
Github user laimis commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/195 @NightOwl888 I wasn't sure how close #191 was, that's why offered this as an option so that Analysis package could be released without ICU dependencies. I will go ahead and close this if it's not

[GitHub] lucenenet issue #195: Moving ICU dependent classes into a separate project

2016-11-23 Thread NightOwl888
Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/195 No offense, but since @conniey has already provided a [working solution to the ICU bitness issue](https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/191#issuecomment-262379449), this seems like a step

[GitHub] lucenenet issue #195: Moving ICU dependent classes into a separate project

2016-11-23 Thread synhershko
Github user synhershko commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/195 👍 WDYT @NightOwl888 ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature