This one is successful again, but just because it ran on different Jenkins
node (ubuntu1) which had enough disk space, compared to Jenkins node where
it regularly fails (solaris1) which doesn't have that much disk space.
MAHOUT-1275 will help with this but there are more things we can do about
This is continuation of my and Grant's discussion on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1275 which I believe is better
suited to be continued here on the dev mailing list.
Apologies for my ignorance, if this discussion took place earlier in the
project lifetime.
There is no 0.8 branch
Yes you can do all of this in a branch, which would let things
continue to change on HEAD. Otherwise HEAD has to be frozen. I think
here there's not enough velocity of change to make freezing HEAD that
big of a deal, but yes you could manage the process yourself in a
branch if you wanted to.
Tags
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Saleem Ansari updated MAHOUT-1004:
--
Attachment: MAHOUT-1004-trunk-rebased-but-tests-fail.patch
This patch is to re-base earlier
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13704407#comment-13704407
]
Saleem Ansari commented on MAHOUT-1004:
---
To understand how the user-based
Stevo Slavic created MAHOUT-1277:
Summary: Lose dependency on custom commons-cli
Key: MAHOUT-1277
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1277
Project: Mahout
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stevo Slavic updated MAHOUT-1277:
-
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
Lose dependency on custom commons-cli
Stevo Slavic created MAHOUT-1278:
Summary: Improve inheritance of Apache parent pom
Key: MAHOUT-1278
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1278
Project: Mahout
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stevo Slavic updated MAHOUT-1278:
-
Description:
We should update dependency on Apache parent pom (currently we depend on
version
Erhan Bagdemir created MAHOUT-1279:
--
Summary: The test TestMinHashClustering fails in Mahout core
Key: MAHOUT-1279
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1279
Project: Mahout
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13704618#comment-13704618
]
Suneel Marthi commented on MAHOUT-1279:
---
1. Are you working off of present project
Getting this error when I run the mahout program on a cluster
running Hadoop 2.0.0-cdh4.2.1; are we not supporting that new a version of
Hadoop?
$ ./bin/mahout
Running on hadoop, using /usr/bin/hadoop and HADOOP_CONF_DIR=
MAHOUT-JOB:
I don't think we are presently supporting Hadoop 2.0.0, still on Hadoop 1.x.
Please correct me here.
From: Andrew Musselman andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: 0.8 progress
Getting this
In Mahout parent module pom following property is defined:
hadoop.version=1.1.2
In Mahout core module pom there are two profiles:
profiles
profile
idhadoop-0.20/id
activation
property
name!hadoop.version/name
/property
/activation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13704667#comment-13704667
]
Erhan Bagdemir commented on MAHOUT-1279:
Hi Suneel,
i just checked out the
So quick question: is an intentional side-effect of the current release
process that when we build on trunk now, we build artifacts named e.g.
mahout-examples-0.9-SNAPSHOT-job.jar ?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Sean Owen sro...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes you can do all of this in a branch, which
That's how the maven release plugin does it in my experience, and yes
that's what I get now too.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Jake Mannix jake.man...@gmail.com wrote:
So quick question: is an intentional side-effect of the current release
process that when we build on trunk now, we build
I am currently persuading my Masters degree ( 2nd year ) from Indian
Institute Of Information Technology And Management-Kerala ,India.
I am one among the 50 Student Candidate who participated in Pilot Mentoring
Programme with India ICFOSS under Mr.Luciano
+1
From: Andrew Musselman andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: Mahout release process
That's how the maven release plugin does it in my experience, and yes
that's what I get now too.
On
...not to mention that we are back to executing the tests serially = no more
random test failures and longer build times.
From: Andrew Musselman andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: Mahout
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com wrote:
That's how the maven release plugin does it in my experience, and yes
that's what I get now too.
Ok, that's fine if it's intended, but it seems to put us in a little bit of
a weird state. We tell
our users
I have to admit I spent as little time as possible learning how to do maven
releases so I don't know the answer to this.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Jake Mannix jake.man...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Andrew Musselman
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com wrote:
That's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on MAHOUT-797 stopped by Dmitriy Lyubimov.
MapReduce SSVD: provide alternative B-pipeline per B=R' ^{-1} Y'A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov resolved MAHOUT-797.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Ok, I am punting this for now, this is stale. While it is easy to
Dmitriy Lyubimov created MAHOUT-1280:
Summary: Move out UpperTriangular matrix out of ssvd into
mahout-math. Add SymmetricMatrix.
Key: MAHOUT-1280
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1280
Dmitriy Lyubimov created MAHOUT-1281:
Summary: Wean distributed SSVD from apache-math dependency.
Key: MAHOUT-1281
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1281
Project: Mahout
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Mahout-Examples-Cluster-Reuters-II/538/
--
[...truncated 2171 lines...]
[INFO] Writing to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov updated MAHOUT-1280:
-
Attachment: MAHOUT-1280.patch-1
Move out UpperTriangular matrix out of ssvd into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on MAHOUT-1280 started by Dmitriy Lyubimov.
Move out UpperTriangular matrix out of ssvd into mahout-math. Add
SymmetricMatrix.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov updated MAHOUT-1280:
-
Affects Version/s: 0.8
Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress)
It looks like values out of our ported EigenDecomposition are coming out
sorted in inverse order.
Shouldn't it be the other way around?
changing line 329 of EigenDecomposition.java from
if (d.getQuick(j) p) {
to
if (d.getQuick(j) p) {
makes my MAHOUT-1281 patch work.
should i keep the change? (question for Ted, i guess)
thanks.
-D
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov
Looks like Lanczos is having the same problem and need to undo some
workarounds :
EigenDecomposition decomp = new EigenDecomposition(triDiag);
Matrix eigenVects = decomp.getV();
Vector eigenVals = decomp.getRealEigenvalues();
endTime(TimingSection.TRIDIAG_DECOMP);
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov updated MAHOUT-1280:
-
Attachment: MAHOUT-1280.patch-2
Move out UpperTriangular matrix out of ssvd into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov updated MAHOUT-1281:
-
Attachment: MAHOUT-1281.patch-1
SSVDSolver and LanczosSover Tests seem working.
also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov updated MAHOUT-1281:
-
Affects Version/s: 0.8
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Wean
i thought maven release:prepare changes from 0.8-SNAPSHOT to 0.8 (and
eliminates snapshot dependencies). and release:perform goes from 0.8 to
0.9-SNAPSHOT. I.e. it guarantees that by the time you have 0.9-SNAPSHOT
set, you also have a released 0.8 build.
but for some reason it is not what is
Please file. Looks completely innocuous and it is good to be standard.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov dlie...@gmail.comwrote:
Looks like Lanczos is having the same problem and need to undo some
workarounds :
EigenDecomposition decomp = new
These changes look like a really good idea. That is, except that it might
be nice to keep builds for, say, 30 days for reference purposes. Even 10
days would be helpful.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Stevo Slavić ssla...@gmail.com wrote:
This one is successful again, but just because it
fixed as part of MAHOUT-1281 patch now. I will push after code freeze.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Please file. Looks completely innocuous and it is good to be standard.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov dlie...@gmail.com
meant, after code freeze is over.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov dlie...@gmail.com wrote:
fixed as part of MAHOUT-1281 patch now. I will push after code freeze.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.comwrote:
Please file. Looks completely
Hello,
it looks like DiagonalMatrix does not do anything special about
multiplication (left or right). Seems like a waste (especially if diagonal
is a sparse vector).
Would it make sense to add an optimized multiplication?
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Mahout-Quality/2141/
Yes. It definitely would make sense (if people do this).
I can see that if multiplication by a diagonal matrix is optimized that
this would be a very nice way to express row (left multiplication) or
column (right multiplication) scaling or weighting. The only down-side of
this approach is that
yes, i need this
ok already got it added, will file a jira fo review of the patch
-d
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. It definitely would make sense (if people do this).
I can see that if multiplication by a diagonal matrix is optimized that
Cool.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov dlie...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, i need this
ok already got it added, will file a jira fo review of the patch
-d
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes. It definitely would make sense (if
Dmitriy Lyubimov created MAHOUT-1282:
Summary: Optimize Diagonal matrix multiplication. add left/right
multiply versions
Key: MAHOUT-1282
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1282
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on MAHOUT-1282 started by Dmitriy Lyubimov.
Optimize Diagonal matrix multiplication. add left/right multiply versions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov updated MAHOUT-1282:
-
Attachment: MAHOUT-1282.patch-1
first round on left/right multiplication in Diagonal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov updated MAHOUT-1282:
-
Affects Version/s: 0.8
Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress)
50 matches
Mail list logo
