Hi all, has anyone reviewed this artifact? Vote has been open for 4 days
now.
Karl
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Sorry about that!! Yes, Piergiorgio is correct, as always. :-)
> Karl
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:28 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi <
> p
s if they mock a
> Sharepoint server ...
> El El lun, 3 abr 2017 a las 9:18, Piergiorgio Lucidi <
> piergior...@apache.org>
> escribió:
>
> > 2017-04-03 7:24 GMT+02:00 Karl Wright :
> >
> > > Hi all, has anyone reviewed this artifact? Vote has been open for
on from them, let's try ;)
>
> Cheers,
> PJ
>
>
> 2017-04-03 16:10 GMT+02:00 Rafa Haro :
>
> > Good point haha. Ok I will reviewing on Wednesday, I'm on holidays today
> > and tomorrow
> > El El lun, 3 abr 2017 a las 11:56, Karl Wright
> > escribió:
I still need one more vote?
Karl
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Thanks, Piergiorgio!
> I've been relying on users of ManifoldCF for SharePoint crawling to
> validate this plugin, which is OK but not great. I'm told you can also get
> an Amazon Sha
o wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> I have inspected the release content, download the project but couldn't
> build it because I can't setup the proper environment. My vote is +1,
> completely trusting on your own testing.
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:06 PM Karl Wright wro
Hi folks,
I would like to put together a ManifoldCF 2.7 release candidate by the
beginning of next week. However, there are a number of open tickets. Some
of them appear to be near complete, such as the Nuxeo connector; others
seem to be forgotten for the moment. But we need to finish things up
it on the next release.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > PJ
> >
> > 2017-04-10 9:02 GMT+02:00 Karl Wright :
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I would like to put together a ManifoldCF 2.7 release candidate by the
> > > beginning of next we
ache tasks.
If the code is done, but build.xml just needs to be updated to pull in its
dependencies, then I'm happy to do that work, provided the Nuxeo client is
properly licensed and is available from the Maven repository. Please let
me know.
Karl
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Kar
nch
>> > today. I will change the build.xml file myself but I'm not going to be
>> able
>> > to test it at least today.
>> >
>> > I will let you know. I'm out now, but I expect to reach home and do it
>> in a
>> > couple of hours
>>
the delay. In some minutes I will inform about the
> build result
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:29 PM Karl Wright wrote:
>
> > Thanks; I'll check out the ant build.
> >
> > Karl
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Rafa Haro wrote:
>
Looks like NuxeoClient is missing but required in the ant build.
Karl
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Are there new dependencies downloaded into lib? If so, what are they?
> How are they licensed? Have you run "mvn dependencies:tree" to make sure
included it and I already checked the compatibility some
> time ago.
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:37 PM Karl Wright wrote:
>
> > Are there new dependencies downloaded into lib? If so, what are they?
> How
> > are they licensed? Have you run "mvn depend
-2\lib\nuxeo-java-client-2.5-SNAPSHOT.jar
<<<<<<
What am I doing wrong?
Karl
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Ok, I see it is coming out of a special nuxeo-owned repository.
>
> I'll need to construct a download for that in the main build.xm
It looks like there isn't a 2.5 snapshot; there's just a 2.6 snapshot,
uploaded yesterday. Should we use that instead?
Karl
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi Rafa,
>
> I can't seem to download the client jar:
>
> >>>>>&g
The 2.6 snapshot is blank. There is no available 2.5-snapshot anywhere I
can find. I have to conclude it's not available except when built
privately?
I guess we can release the connector with the 2.5 jar?
Karl
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> It looks like the
too.
I'll take care of that later tonight. Luckily they all seem Apache 2.0
licensed.
Karl
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> The 2.6 snapshot is blank. There is no available 2.5-snapshot anywhere I
> can find. I have to conclude it's not available except when bu
nd out soon enough.
Karl
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Also, for what it's worth, these are the dependencies from the
> nuxeo-java-client.jar:
>
> >>>>>>
> [INFO] \- org.nuxeo.client:nuxeo-java-client:jar:2.5:compile
> [INF
erting that you always get back "connection
working". Is there any way to check the connection?
Karl
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Ok, I've added everything needed. There is a version difference that I
> don't want to tackle though right now
t treats all errors as being service interruptions, which is
really not going to cut it.
Karl
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> There were a lot of problems with the code -- everything from missing
> Apache headers to broken HTML to broken password management. I've f
dClass(ClassLoader.java:357)
... 19 more
Exception:
status: 666
type: Error
exception: org/apache/logging/log4j/LogManager
throwable: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
<<<<<<
Karl
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Well, when I r
to manifold classpath
>
> I would suggest to then not include it in this release and leave me
> sometime to properly test and fix it
>
> Wdyt?
>
> El El sáb, 15 abr 2017 a las 7:45, Karl Wright
> escribió:
>
>> FWIW, the reason for the job crawl failure is due to the ver
Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF 2.7, RC0. This release
has many major changes, including a new version of Tika, a new UI, and
major improvements to some connectors, e.g. the Email Connector.
You can download the release from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/manifoldcf/
RC0 withdrawn due to solution found for CONNECTORS-1408.
Karl
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF 2.7, RC0. This
> release has many major changes, including a new version of Tika, a new UI,
> and major improvement
Hi all,
I'm in the process of migrating MCF to log4j 2, but I am having a lot of
trouble getting it to work at all. This is where things stand:
(1) I had to change the name of our logging file from logging.ini to
logging.properties, because otherwise it attempts to interpret it as XML;
(2) The
Yes, of course.
Karl
On Apr 16, 2017 8:15 AM, "Furkan KAMACI" wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> Did you check here:
> https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/migration.html
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Karl Wright wr
FWIW, it turns out that I could not get a .properties configuration to
work. But I was able to get an XML configuration to work, so I switched to
that.
Karl
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Yes, of course.
> Karl
>
> On Apr 16, 2017 8:15 AM, "Furk
Hi Karl,
>
> Just for summarizing, what is then remaining here?
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM Karl Wright (JIRA)
> wrote:
>
> >
> > [
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1290?
> page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.
s log4j2.properties?
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
> > FWIW, it turns out that I could not get a .properties configuration to
> > work. But I was able to get an XML configuration to work, so I switched
&g
Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF 2.7, RC1. This release
has many major changes, including a new version of Tika, a new UI, and
major improvements to some connectors, e.g. the Email Connector.
You can download the release from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/manifoldcf/
Ran standard tests.
+1 from me.
Karl
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF 2.7, RC1. This
> release has many major changes, including a new version of Tika, a new UI,
> and major improvements to some connectors,
1:28, Karl Wright
> escribió:
>
> > Ran standard tests.
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > Karl
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Karl Wright
> wrote:
> >
> > > Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF 2.7, RC1. This
Ran it again; it did much better, but still failed because the alfresco
nexus repo is down (it returns 500 errors).
Karl
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Jenkins is complaining about trunk. And it appears it tried to run the
> job on a machine that did not ha
em.
> >
> > +1 for me
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:22 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> >
> > > Ran it again; it did much better, but still failed because the alfresco
> > > nexus repo is down (it returns 500 errors).
> > >
> > > Karl
>
Can you clarify? Are you +1 for releasing RC1, or are you +1 for spinning
an RC2 with the fix for CONNECTORS-1412?
Karl
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> I am +1 for releasing 2.7
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
> > Should
quot;0" when the server is not running any more,
> could be a more descriptive error
>
>
>
> Am 17.04.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Karl Wright:
> > Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF 2.7, RC1. This
> release
> > has many major changes, including a new
multiprocess-zk-example,
> the UI version shows "unknown version".
> The other two shows the correct version 2.7.
>
> Thanks,
> KK
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 17 April 2017 08:17
> To: dev
> Sub
Ah, the reason is because the version property should be in
properties-global.xml for the zookeeper examples.
I don't think this is important enough to respin. I've corrected this on
trunk; r1791837
Karl
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi KK,
>
> Th
FIve +1's, >72 hrs. Vote passes!
Karl
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Shinichiro Abe
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ran tests, unpacked the bin and ran a job.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Shinichiro Abe
>
> 2017-04-19 6:44 GMT+09:00 Karl Wright :
> > Ah, the reason is
The Apache ManifoldCF team has just released Apache ManifoldCF 2.7. This
release includes many significant changes, including a new Ajax-based user
interface, SharePoint 2016 support, and numerous bug fixes.
Please join me in congratulating the development community for their hard
work in getting
below element
>
> src="../images/asf_18_years.png" title="Apache Software Foundation"
> width="128px" height="128px">
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kishore Kumar
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ka
Can you create a ticket and submit a new patch against trunk? Thanks!!
Karl
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Cihad Guzel wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> I had sent a patch[1] for email connector filter. However, I think we
> should change date format to "dd/MM/" from "dd/MM/yy".
>
> --
> Cihad Güz
16-support.html
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> ^__^
>
> Cheers,
> PJ
>
> 2017-04-21 12:35 GMT+02:00 Karl Wright :
>
> > Hi KK,
> >
> > The duplication I can fix, but the logo is harder; it's a Forrest site,
> and
> > the logo is only mentioned her
Hi Cihad,
The right thing to do is to capture this exception:
>>
Caused by: javax.mail.MessagingException: * BYE JavaMail Exception:
java.io.IOException: Connection dropped by server?
<<
... and throw a ServiceInterruption when it is seen, instead of a
ManifoldCFException.
Can you creat
See CONNECTORS-1423. This appears to be serious enough because it makes it
impossible to configure several of our connectors.
Thoughts?
Karl
Ok, I've updated the release-2.7-branch branch accordingly, and will try to
spin a new release on Sunday.
Karl
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Markus Schuch wrote:
> +1 for release
>
> Am 6. Mai 2017 00:01:29 MESZ schrieb Karl Wright :
> >See CONNECTORS-1423. This a
Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF 2.7.1. This release
contains fixes for CONNECTORS-1422 and CONNECTORS-1423.
You can find the release at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/manifoldcf/apache-manifoldcf-2.7.1
There is also a tag at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/manifo
for the release candidate itself, but +1
from me.
Karl
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF 2.7.1. This release
> contains fixes for CONNECTORS-1422 and CONNECTORS-1423.
>
> You can find the release a
dex.jsp in which I made a change to load the latest mcf.js.
> https://github.com/apache/manifoldcf/commit/98d5b3a3b54aedffbae88019b41b70
> 67f1171fe8
>
> If it's left intentional, I am fine.
>
> Thanks,
> KK
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Karl Wright [mail
Any other voters? We need one more. It would be great to at least check
signatures?
Karl
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Yes, that was intentional. Patch releases are only meant to contain
> critical fixes.
>
> Thanks,
> Karl
>
>
> On Mon,
Hi Julien,
Yes, both of these are of interest, provided there's not a lot of
additional work that would be required to on-board them, and provided that
the Tika transformation connector would be backwards compatible with the
current one.
Karl
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:27 AM, wrote:
> Hello MC
the backward
> compatibility before sending the source code)
>
> How can I proceed ? I prepare two patches and send them to this mailing
> list as attachment ?
>
> Julien
>
>
> Le 10.05.2017 11:31, Karl Wright a écrit :
>
>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> Yes,
Three +1's, >72 hrs. Vote passes!
Karl
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> I've run tests (I did not verify the signatures).
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
must
ensure that your browser cache is flushed before the fix for this problem
will be in effect.
Thanks!
Karl Wright
I have no objection, if you think you can implement such a connector
readily.
Karl
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Currently we have a "Individual Email Repository Connection" which works on
> IMAP, IMAP-SSL, POP3, or POP3-SSL.
>
> However, I think that we
I think this is a fine idea!
Karl
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know what you think about adding two new connectors in the
> project dedicated to crawl and migrate contents against the Azure Content
> Storage.
>
> I could work on these new
Hi Piergiorgio,
I think you are doing a great job expanding MCF's ability to port content
from system to system. This can only help.
The only concern I have is whether the Alfresco bulk importer can be used
for synchronization, or whether it would be a once-only arrangement. As
you know, in ord
I'd also like to ask the same question about the CMIS output connector.
Does it work in that way? And, is it finally ready to merge to trunk?
Karl
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi Piergiorgio,
>
> I think you are doing a great job expanding MCF
Thanks!
Karl
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have found out that the link in the OpenCMIS website was broken because
> it will bring to the old ManifoldCF website returning a 404:
>
> I have raised an issue for them:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Hi Julien,
(1) Filtering by job ID is possible; this is something that could be worked
on.
(2) The maximum number of documents that the UI displays is determined by a
properties.xml parameter. We need the limit, though, because some
databases (e.g. Postgresql) do sequential scans to count the num
Concerning the filter by job ID, can I create a JIRA ticket ? if yes, on
> which component ? if I remember well, only connectors components are listed.
>
> Thanks,
> Julien
>
> De : Karl Wright
> Envoyé le :vendredi 30 juin 2017 16:20
> À : dev
> Objet :Re: ManifoldCF a
Hi Clay,
I have to defer to the person who wrote the Kafka connector on this. I'll
forward your question on.
Karl
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Clay Teahouse
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have a few questions regarding kafka connect. I'd appreciate your
> replies.
>
> 1) Is there a kafka conne
There is a ticket for this but the last person to look at this made no
progress and dropped it.
Karl
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Cihad Guzel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There isn't manifoldcf in mvn repository [1] . It would be nice to be added
> in it ?
>
> [1] https://mvnrepository.com/search?q=ap
Hi all,
The train is preparing to leave the station once again. If you have
projects you are working on that really should get committed for this
release, this is the time to get them merged!!
Karl
Getting this output:
...
[source-patterns] Unescaped symbol "->" on line #84:
solr/solr-ref-guide/src/res
ponse-writers.adoc
[source-patterns] Unescaped symbol "->" on line #185:
solr/solr-ref-guide/src/re
sponse-writers.adoc
[source-patterns] Unescaped symbol "->" on line #87:
solr/solr-ref-guide
Apologies; posted this to the wrong list. Please disregard.
Karl
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Getting this output:
>
> ...
> [source-patterns] Unescaped symbol "->" on line #84:
> solr/solr-ref-guide/src/res
> ponse-writers.adoc
>
Hi all,
It's getting to be time to wrap up ManifoldCF 2.8. First, does anyone want
to volunteer to be the release manager for this cycle? And, second, is
everyone done with their 2.8 tickets? Please figure out what you want to
do with them as soon as possible, so that we may close out the relea
Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF version 2.8, RC0.
The release artifacts can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/manifoldcf/apache-manifoldcf-2.8
There is also a tag at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/manifoldcf/tags/release-2.8-RC0
This release includes a
gt; Ran the tests and ran a job
> >
> > +1 from my side
> >
> > 2017-08-16 5:20 GMT+02:00 Shinichiro Abe :
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Ran tests, unpacked the bin and ran a job.
> > >
> > > +1 from me.
> > >
> > >
This release includes a new connector (Nuxeo) as well as numerous fixes and
improvements to other connectors. Solr 6.x support and ElasticSearch 5.x
support have also been added.
Please join me in congratulating the ManifoldCF team and the ManifoldCF
contributors for their invaluable assistance i
I'm happy to review slides and offer suggestions.
Karl
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:17 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm very proud to share with all of you that my submission to the Open
> Source Summit Europe was accepted :)
>
> As a mentor I'm also involved in the Apache Community pro
Essentially, all Tika extractions for Microsoft Office files will fail
without a fix for this problem, so I think it's pretty severe. What does
everyone else think?
Karl
s by reflection.
Any volunteers for working with Apache POI to create such a ticket, and
follow up?
Karl
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Markus Schuch
wrote:
> +1 for bugfix release
>
> Am 31. August 2017 14:55:16 MESZ schrieb Karl Wright :
> >Essentially, all Tika extracti
Hi all,
As per the discussion yesterday, I've packaged up a ManifoldCF 2.8.1
release to address two problems found with MCF 2.8. Please see
CONNECTORS-1450 and CONNECTORS-1451. Both have to do with Tika integration.
The point release candidate can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis
I ran a job that used the Tika Extractor on:
- pdf
- xlsx
- docx
- vsd
The extractions were all successful.
+1 from me (although I am still waiting to hear back from the user who
reported the problem).
Karl
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A
Withdrawn: CONNECTORS-1452.
Karl
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I ran a job that used the Tika Extractor on:
>
> - pdf
> - xlsx
> - docx
> - vsd
>
> The extractions were all successful.
>
> +1 from me (although I am still waiting to hear bac
Hi all,
As per the discussion yesterday, I've packaged up a ManifoldCF 2.8.1
release to address three problems found with MCF 2.8. Please see
CONNECTORS-1450, CONNECTORS-1451, and CONNECTORS-1452.
The point release candidate can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/manifoldcf/apa
I started zookeeper using runzookeeper.bat, and I successfully started up a
zookeeper-based ManifoldCF cluster.
+1 from me (although, once again, I reserve the right to withdraw my vote
if the user doesn't have success).
Karl
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
This is to address the Tika integration issue that POI caused for us. I
will file a similar ticket about log4j 2.x compatibility with Zookeeper
shortly.
Karl
ZOOKEEPER-2889 has been filed for the log4j 2.x incompatibility described
in CONNECTORS-1452.
Karl
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 4:50 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> This is to address the Tika integration issue that POI caused for us. I
> will file a similar ticket about log4j 2.x compatibilit
Withdrawn again -- I got the wrong version of Apache POI (3.9 -- the Tika
dependency is for 3.15).
Karl
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I started zookeeper using runzookeeper.bat, and I successfully started up
> a zookeeper-based ManifoldCF cluster.
>
>
Hi all,
As per the discussion yesterday, I've packaged up a ManifoldCF 2.8.1
release to address three problems found with MCF 2.8. Please see
CONNECTORS-1450, CONNECTORS-1451, and CONNECTORS-1452.
The point release candidate can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/manifoldcf/apa
Tested to be sure runzookeeper.bat works.
User who needed the fix also notes the entire setup now working for him.
+1 from me.
Karl
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As per the discussion yesterday, I've packaged up a ManifoldCF 2.8.1
> r
. I think it should be
> .sha512 with the new distribution policy.Did you used updated release.bat
> to create the release candidate?
> Thanks,Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 5, 2017, 10:04:17 AM GMT+3, Karl Wright <
> daddy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
&g
Hello all, I need two more votes for this release.
Karl
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi Ahmet,
>
> I did not update. However, this is a point release meant to replace 2.8,
> so I think it is acceptable to have the same files as the 2.8 release.
>
>
Now I need just one more vote.
;-)
Karl
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> Certainly +1 from me.
>
>
> 6 Eyl 2017 Çar, saat 08:38 tarihinde Karl Wright şunu
> yazdı:
>
> > Hello all, I need two more votes for this release.
> >
> > Karl
&
Thanks for the vote, Zane. But I still need one more committer to chime in.
Karl
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Zane Mumford <
zmumf...@searchtechnologies.com> wrote:
> +1 from me.
> Issue fixed according to user who needed it.
> Zane
>
> -Original Message
Still looking for another vote... it's been 5 days...
Karl
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Thanks for the vote, Zane. But I still need one more committer to chime
> in.
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Zane Mumford com> wro
Three +1's, >72 hours. Vote passes!
Karl
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Kishore Kumar
wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> Regards,
> Kishore Kumar
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 07 September 2017 11:04
> To: dev
Please vote on whether to release the Apache ManifoldCF Solr 7.x Plugin
2.2, RC0.
This is the first release of this plugin, and goes along with the release
of Solr 7.0.0.
The release binary can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/manifoldcf/apache-manifoldcf-solr-7.x-plugin-2.2
Ran tests and checked packaging.
+1 from me.
(And, thanks to Abe-san for doing this work!!)
Karl
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Please vote on whether to release the Apache ManifoldCF Solr 7.x Plugin
> 2.2, RC0.
>
> This is the first release of this plug
Three +1's, >72 hours. Vote passes!
Karl
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Shinichiro Abe
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ran tests, unpacked the bin.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Shinichiro Abe
>
> 2017-09-21 9:26 GMT+09:00 Karl Wright :
>
> > Please vot
Hi all,
Right now, the repository connector generates an "ID" for each document
that is in the form of a URL, and heretofore we require the target
repository to be able to keep track of that "ID" for each document, and to
request document updates and deletions based on that "ID". But this
doesn't
ument for those too.
I've committed the changes needed to Piergiorgio's branch.
Karl
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
> Right now, the repository connector generates an "ID" for each document
> that is in the form of a URL, and heretof
4:57 PM, Luis Cabaceira wrote:
> I was referring to get job input data, to access the job settings you
> configure for the repository input connectors. For example repository paths.
>
> [image: Inline images 1]
>
>
>
> On 27 September 2017 at 18:06, Karl Wright wrote:
>
I would suggest creating a "content filter" transformation connector to do
this, and use it in your job's pipeline.
Thanks,
Karl
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 4:32 AM, David Ciamberlano <
david.ciamberl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use Manifold to collect infos about the content of
Steph has been contributing for many months towards a more robust
ElasticSearch output connector and is very committed to ManifoldCF. Please
extend a warm welcome!
- The ManifoldCF PMC
Julien has been contributing to ManifoldCF by way of France Labs for quite
some time. Please extend Julien a warm welcome!
- The ManifoldCF PMC
Luis works with Alfresco and has been spearheading efforts to use
ManifoldCF as a data migration tool. Please extend him a warm welcome!
- The ManifoldCF PMC
Hi Luis,
No, we have no documentation for this connector. It was contributed quite
a while ago (a couple of years I think), but so far nobody has been able to
contribute docs for it.
Karl
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Luis Cabaceira wrote:
> Hi, i can't find any documentation for the S3 Re
ber 2017 at 13:44, Karl Wright wrote:
>
> > Hi Luis,
> >
> > No, we have no documentation for this connector. It was contributed
> quite
> > a while ago (a couple of years I think), but so far nobody has been able
> to
> > contribute docs for it.
>
901 - 1000 of 9402 matches
Mail list logo
