Re: Request for vision review

2021-12-02 Thread Lucas Bonatto Miguel
Hi all, We just finished the meeting, here are some notes and next steps: - There were 6 persons in the meeting - We all agree Marvin scope should be simplified, we want to give more focus on things Marvin is already doing well and there are no similar solutions in the community - We want to

Re: Request for vision review

2021-11-11 Thread Daniel Lucredio
+1 Em sex., 5 de nov. de 2021 às 14:16, Zhang Yifei escreveu: > +1 > > Em sex., 5 de nov. de 2021 às 08:25, Mario de Sá Vera > escreveu: > > > +1 > > > > Em qui., 4 de nov. de 2021 às 21:03, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < > > lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > As the current

Re: Request for vision review

2021-11-05 Thread Zhang Yifei
+1 Em sex., 5 de nov. de 2021 às 08:25, Mario de Sá Vera escreveu: > +1 > > Em qui., 4 de nov. de 2021 às 21:03, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < > lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu: > > > Hi, > > > > As the current version of Marvin is not getting enough traction in both > > usage and development, some

Re: Request for vision review

2021-11-05 Thread Mario de Sá Vera
+1 Em qui., 4 de nov. de 2021 às 21:03, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu: > Hi, > > As the current version of Marvin is not getting enough traction in both > usage and development, some action needs to be taken. After discussing with > a few stakeholders, we believe that the

Re: Request for vision review

2021-11-04 Thread Lucas Cardoso Silva
+1 I think it's a good plan to discuss these changes. On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:03 PM Lucas Bonatto Miguel wrote: > Hi, > > As the current version of Marvin is not getting enough traction in both > usage and development, some action needs to be taken. After discussing with > a few stakeholders,