[continuum build trunk - SUCCESS - checkout] Sat Feb 18 01:00:00 GMT 2006

2006-02-17 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/builds/trunk/continuum-20060218.010001.war Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/logs/trunk/continuum-build-log-20060218.010001.txt

[jira] Created: (DOXIA-52) Improve the FmlParser class

2006-02-17 Thread Vincent Siveton (JIRA)
Improve the FmlParser class --- Key: DOXIA-52 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-52 Project: doxia Type: Improvement Components: Core Versions: 1.0-alpha-8 Reporter: Vincent Siveton Attachments: FmlParser.diff This

[jira] Commented: (MNGECLIPSE-75) Update source folders action should set default output folder

2006-02-17 Thread Jochen Wiedmann (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGECLIPSE-75?page=comments#action_58900 ] Jochen Wiedmann commented on MNGECLIPSE-75: --- First of all, I apologize for confusing this bugs handling by attaching my test project. I had the impression it would be

[jira] Updated: (MNG-1703) pluginManagementdependencies is not propagated to child POMs

2006-02-17 Thread Edwin Punzalan (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1703?page=all ] Edwin Punzalan updated MNG-1703: Attachment: MNG-1703-maven-project.patch pluginManagementdependencies is not propagated to child POMs

[jira] Commented: (MAVENUPLOAD-745) xpp3 pull parser

2006-02-17 Thread Joerg Schaible (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-745?page=comments#action_58902 ] Joerg Schaible commented on MAVENUPLOAD-745: Michael, just wanna say thank you for doing this. I wanted to do the same for ages and never found time. I always

[jira] Closed: (MNG-2079) scm plugin cannot checkout nested modules

2006-02-17 Thread Emmanuel Venisse (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2079?page=all ] Emmanuel Venisse closed MNG-2079: - Resolution: Won't Fix The preferred solution is : mvn scm:checkout -DconnectionUrl=scm:svn:. If you want to wget the pom, you must run scm:checkout with

[jira] Commented: (MAVENUPLOAD-742) Please upload maven-qalab-plugin

2006-02-17 Thread Dave Sag (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-742?page=comments#action_58909 ] Dave Sag commented on MAVENUPLOAD-742: -- sorry i'm not so up with the latest maven jargon. what does Try to deploy it to a repo (can be a file:// repo) could you please

[continuum build branches/continuum-1.0.x - SUCCESS - update] Fri Feb 17 10:30:00 GMT 2006

2006-02-17 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/builds/branches/continuum-1.0.x/continuum-20060217.103001.tar.gz Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/logs/branches/continuum-1.0.x/continuum-build-log-20060217.103001.txt

[jira] Created: (MJAVADOC-58) additionalparam content should not be included in apostrophes on the commandline

2006-02-17 Thread Rik Graetke (JIRA)
additionalparam content should not be included in apostrophes on the commandline -- Key: MJAVADOC-58 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-58 Project: Maven 2.x Javadoc Plugin

[jira] Created: (MAVEN-1748) 'maven jboss' goal when run with Maven 1.1. beta 2 generates bad run.bat and shutdown.bat files

2006-02-17 Thread Manisha Sur (JIRA)
'maven jboss' goal when run with Maven 1.1. beta 2 generates bad run.bat and shutdown.bat files Key: MAVEN-1748 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1748 Project: Maven

[jira] Closed: (MSITE-92) site:stage fails, goal not found

2006-02-17 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-92?page=all ] Brett Porter closed MSITE-92: - Assign To: Brett Porter Resolution: Won't Fix PrematureDocumentationException The goal only exists in SVN. I'll roll back the site to the last release.

[jira] Commented: (MNG-2079) scm plugin cannot checkout nested modules

2006-02-17 Thread Dan Allen (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2079?page=comments#action_58916 ] Dan Allen commented on MNG-2079: Hey, thanks for the quick response! I would like to see this make it into the documentation somewhere, to avoid future bugs reports. However, I think

[jira] Moved: (MPIR-30) The automatically generated documentation should identify the project's group id, artifact id, and maybe version

2006-02-17 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-30?page=all ] Brett Porter moved MNG-2080 to MPIR-30: --- Version: (was: 2.0.2) Component: (was: Dependencies) Complexity: (was: Intermediate) Workflow: Maven (was: Maven New)

[jira] Closed: (WAGON-35) wagon doesn't support site:deploy via ftp

2006-02-17 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-35?page=all ] Brett Porter closed WAGON-35: - Assign To: Brett Porter Resolution: Duplicate WAGONFTP-7 wagon doesn't support site:deploy via ftp - Key:

[jira] Updated: (MPIR-30) The automatically generated documentation should identify the project's group id, artifact id, and maybe version

2006-02-17 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-30?page=all ] Brett Porter updated MPIR-30: - Fix Version: 2.0 The automatically generated documentation should identify the project's group id, artifact id, and maybe version

[jira] Updated: (MRM-38) add a background task scheduler

2006-02-17 Thread John Tolentino (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-38?page=all ] John Tolentino updated MRM-38: -- Attachment: MRM-38-maven-repository-webapp.diff add a background task scheduler --- Key: MRM-38 URL:

[jira] Moved: (MPJBOSS-24) 'maven jboss' goal when run with Maven 1.1. beta 2 generates bad run.bat and shutdown.bat files

2006-02-17 Thread Arnaud Heritier (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJBOSS-24?page=all ] Arnaud Heritier moved MAVEN-1748 to MPJBOSS-24: --- Workflow: jira (was: Maven) Key: MPJBOSS-24 (was: MAVEN-1748) Project: maven-jboss-plugin (was: Maven) 'maven

[jira] Commented: (MPJBOSS-24) 'maven jboss' goal when run with Maven 1.1. beta 2 generates bad run.bat and shutdown.bat files

2006-02-17 Thread Arnaud Heritier (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJBOSS-24?page=comments#action_58919 ] Arnaud Heritier commented on MPJBOSS-24: This will not be fixed. We stop the maintenance for this plugin. If you provide a patch will try apply it and to publish a SNAPSHOT if

[jira] Created: (MNG-2081) Typing error in apt files

2006-02-17 Thread Vincent Siveton (JIRA)
Typing error in apt files - Key: MNG-2081 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2081 Project: Maven 2 Type: Bug Components: Documentation: General Versions: 2.0.1 Reporter: Vincent Siveton Attachments:

[jira] Commented: (MNGECLIPSE-59) Allow artifact resolution from workspace projects

2006-02-17 Thread Michael Mattox (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGECLIPSE-59?page=comments#action_58925 ] Michael Mattox commented on MNGECLIPSE-59: -- We're really stuck on this. So far the only solution we have is to have two pom.xml, a pom.xml for the maven eclipse plugin

[jira] Created: (DOXIA-50) Improve the AptParser class

2006-02-17 Thread Vincent Siveton (JIRA)
Improve the AptParser class --- Key: DOXIA-50 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-50 Project: doxia Type: Improvement Components: Core Versions: 1.0-alpha-8 Reporter: Vincent Siveton Attachments: AptParser.diff This

[jira] Commented: (MECLIPSE-8) Suport sources generator in eclipse plugin

2006-02-17 Thread Nico Przybylek (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MECLIPSE-8?page=comments#action_58926 ] Nico Przybylek commented on MECLIPSE-8: --- Since the new release I am not able to use maven2 any longer as I did. The problem is that I have a project with compile errors. I

[jira] Created: (DOXIA-51) RtfSink supports only .ppm image type in figureGraphics()

2006-02-17 Thread Vincent Siveton (JIRA)
RtfSink supports only .ppm image type in figureGraphics() --- Key: DOXIA-51 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-51 Project: doxia Type: Bug Components: Core Versions: 1.0-alpha-8

[continuum build branches/continuum-1.0.x - FAILED - update] Fri Feb 17 14:30:00 GMT 2006

2006-02-17 Thread continuum
Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/logs/branches/continuum-1.0.x/continuum-build-log-20060217.143001.txt

[jira] Updated: (MNG-2081) Typing error in apt files

2006-02-17 Thread Emmanuel Venisse (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2081?page=all ] Emmanuel Venisse updated MNG-2081: -- Fix Version: 2.0.3 Typing error in apt files - Key: MNG-2081 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2081

[continuum build trunk - SUCCESS - update] Fri Feb 17 15:00:00 GMT 2006

2006-02-17 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/builds/trunk/continuum-20060217.150001.war Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/logs/trunk/continuum-build-log-20060217.150001.txt

[jira] Updated: (MAVENUPLOAD-745) xpp3 pull parser

2006-02-17 Thread Michael B?ckling (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-745?page=all ] Michael Böckling updated MAVENUPLOAD-745: - Attachment: xpp3_min-1.1.3.4.O-bundle.jar xpp3 pull parser Key: MAVENUPLOAD-745 URL:

[jira] Updated: (MAVENUPLOAD-745) xpp3 pull parser

2006-02-17 Thread Michael B?ckling (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-745?page=all ] Michael Böckling updated MAVENUPLOAD-745: - Attachment: xpp3_xpath-1.1.3.4.O-bundle.jar xpp3 pull parser Key: MAVENUPLOAD-745 URL:

[jira] Created: (WAGON-36) An exception is throwed when the http response code is 201

2006-02-17 Thread Alexandre Poitras (JIRA)
An exception is throwed when the http response code is 201 -- Key: WAGON-36 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-36 Project: wagon Type: Bug Versions: 1.0-alpha-6 Reporter: Alexandre Poitras

[proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread John Casey
Hi, I'd like to add pre/post phases for all of the major lifecycle phases that don't already have it. I'm starting to see cases where a particular packaging maps multiple mojos to the same lifecycle phase, and this means we cannot control that phase through the old suppress-and-augment

[continuum build branches/continuum-1.0.x - SUCCESS - update] Fri Feb 17 15:30:01 GMT 2006

2006-02-17 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/builds/branches/continuum-1.0.x/continuum-20060217.153001.tar.gz Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/logs/branches/continuum-1.0.x/continuum-build-log-20060217.153001.txt

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel John Casey a écrit : Hi, I'd like to add pre/post phases for all of the major lifecycle phases that don't already have it. I'm starting to see cases where a particular packaging maps multiple mojos to the same lifecycle phase, and this means we cannot control that phase through

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Piéroni Raphaël
+1 can you add a post-compile-generate-resources phase ? sometimes a resource is generated (wsdl file) after the compile phase. for example, the axistool plugin needs for the classes to be generated in order to generated the wsdl files from them. and the plugin also try to add it to the

[jira] Created: (MNG-2082) assembly:assembly doesn't recognize pre-defined assembly types

2006-02-17 Thread Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)
assembly:assembly doesn't recognize pre-defined assembly types -- Key: MNG-2082 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2082 Project: Maven 2 Type: Bug Components: Artifacts Versions: 2.0.2

[jira] Commented: (MNG-2082) assembly:assembly doesn't recognize pre-defined assembly types

2006-02-17 Thread Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2082?page=comments#action_58935 ] Howard M. Lewis Ship commented on MNG-2082: --- My bad; I had two pom.xml's and got confused. Once I update the correct pom, I'm back in business. assembly:assembly doesn't

[jira] Closed: (CONTINUUM-496) End Time contains junk value when I forced a build to run

2006-02-17 Thread Emmanuel Venisse (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-496?page=all ] Emmanuel Venisse closed CONTINUUM-496: -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed. End Time contains junk value when I forced a build to run -

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread John Casey
I understand that this is sort of a slippery slope WRT when we stop adding new phases. While there are major categories for the phases of a build, things like the following could occur: I generate a model using Modello, and would like to use my own custom Antlr grammar to create instances of

[jira] Created: (WAGONFTP-10) NPE in wagon-ftp

2006-02-17 Thread Jean-Laurent de Morlhon (JIRA)
NPE in wagon-ftp Key: WAGONFTP-10 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGONFTP-10 Project: wagon-ftp Type: Bug Versions: 1.0-alpha-6 Environment: linux 2.6.7, jdk 1.4.2, maven 2.0.2 Reporter: Jean-Laurent de Morlhon Priority:

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Eric Redmond
+0 to the pre/post phase. As it has been mentioned a million times before, what's the difference between the post of one phase, and the pre of the next. However, I am seeing a need for more than a single execution per stage. I like John's suggesting alot. It makes sense. Within a particular

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Jesse McConnell
+1 on this, with a caveatit is a huge slippery slope that I think we ought to be really clear on...especially since Raphaël already took us down the slope some more :P I am +1 for adding these in to address the immediate need with the understanding that that is it and revisit the issue for

[jira] Commented: (WAGONFTP-10) NPE in wagon-ftp

2006-02-17 Thread Jean-Laurent de Morlhon (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGONFTP-10?page=comments#action_58939 ] Jean-Laurent de Morlhon commented on WAGONFTP-10: - above NPE is related to a missing credential for the ftp server in settings.xml. adding servers server

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread John Casey
IMO a consolidation goal is another workaround. It's definitely possible now, but if we had phase-ordering, we wouldn't need it, right? -j Eric Redmond wrote: +0 to the pre/post phase. As it has been mentioned a million times before, what's the difference between the post of one phase, and

[continuum build branches/continuum-1.0.x - SUCCESS - update] Fri Feb 17 16:30:00 GMT 2006

2006-02-17 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/builds/branches/continuum-1.0.x/continuum-20060217.163001.tar.gz Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/logs/branches/continuum-1.0.x/continuum-build-log-20060217.163001.txt

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread John Casey
The more I think of it, the more I dislike this solution, actually. It simply doesn't address the larger problem, as Raphael inadvertently pointed out. ;-) The only trouble with strict ordering comes with the syntax, and dealing with the various layers of inheritance and injection. Plugin

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Jesse McConnell
I really wonder about adding in more complexity into the pom with things like ordering... one of the attractions of maven imo is that it facilitates making the build a simple thing, small easily digestable chunks of build process, leveraging the dependency mechanism to weave it all together.

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Eric Redmond
Sure, I'm all for inter-phase-ordering, if altering the lifecycle and syntax is up for debate. A consolidation goal is definitely a work-around. I am just really against the pre/post thing. It seems very hacky, and very hand-holdy (who can say if I only need three goals per phase?) Eric On

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Jesse McConnell
if we need to build out a way to get it done, then I rather like the idea of being able to define a ordering of things inside of a phase, and then bind the plugins to that ordering... just to get it done in as clear as way as possible... project lifecycle phases phase

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread John Casey
BTW, Jesse and I have already had this discussion off-list, but I wanted to reflect it in the thread. :-) I couldn't agree more, WRT new projects. Or where people have the ability to manage their project structures. My original example was of two source-generation processes in the same

[maven2 build branches/maven-2.0.x - SUCCESS - update] Fri Feb 17 16:45:00 GMT 2006

2006-02-17 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/builds/branches/maven-2.0.x/m2-20060217.164501.tar.gz Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/logs/branches/maven-2.0.x/m2-build-log-20060217.164501.txt - To unsubscribe,

[jira] Updated: (CONTINUUM-534) Release Continunum 1.0.3

2006-02-17 Thread Emmanuel Venisse (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-534?page=all ] Emmanuel Venisse updated CONTINUUM-534: --- Fix Version: (was: 1.1-alpha-1) 1.0.3 Summary: Release Continunum 1.0.3 (was: Release Continunum 1.1-alpha-1)

[jira] Created: (CONTINUUM-594) Update Maven dependencies to 2.0.3

2006-02-17 Thread Emmanuel Venisse (JIRA)
Update Maven dependencies to 2.0.3 -- Key: CONTINUUM-594 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-594 Project: Continuum Type: Sub-task Components: Core system Reporter: Emmanuel Venisse Assigned to: Emmanuel Venisse

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread John Casey
next thing would be to talk about how inheritance/injection works with this. I think it would have to be inherited treating each phase/ specification as an atom. That way, a phase ordering is never merged from parent to child, but it can be overridden. Since we'd only be imposing order on

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Eric Redmond
I agree with your sentiments here, basically. The problem is, the number of things done to a build cannot always decrease. If you need to generate code, compile it, and then use that code to generate and compile more, well, you cannot avoid the fact that 4 steps are involved. At this point it

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Eric Redmond
Yes. My last job was working for a government-regulated project. The problem was, that they got write-off from the FDA of their build system 10 years ago. There was no way it could change (which is unfortunate, because it sucked). So I wrote a maven front-end to the packaging system, so at least

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Eric Redmond
+1 Now that I like On 2/17/06, Jesse McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if we need to build out a way to get it done, then I rather like the idea of being able to define a ordering of things inside of a phase, and then bind the plugins to that ordering... just to get it done in as clear as

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread John Casey
So, you're suggesting scrapping the lifecycle altogether and going with a required ordering scheme in the POM? I think that's a bit drastic for the average user. Also, it's important that we provide some sort of shorthand to keep users from needing to know what lifecycle bindings are

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Jesse McConnell
I say we force the lifecycle issue, just make it a little easier for someone to shove in an ordered sequence of plugins in the phase of their liking...that should address it nicely :) jesse On 2/17/06, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, you're suggesting scrapping the lifecycle altogether

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
So if i understand how to fix my trouble with the axistools plugin : To summarize my problem : My problem is to add a new resource after compilation. I had this problem because i want to create and API for web service and generate the wsdl from that API. Then use that API in the client side and

[jira] Closed: (MNG-2082) assembly:assembly doesn't recognize pre-defined assembly types

2006-02-17 Thread Trygve Laugstol (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2082?page=all ] Trygve Laugstol closed MNG-2082: Resolution: Incomplete assembly:assembly doesn't recognize pre-defined assembly types --

[jira] Created: (MNG-2083) Path to missing dependency is not shown

2006-02-17 Thread Carlos Sanchez (JIRA)
Path to missing dependency is not shown --- Key: MNG-2083 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2083 Project: Maven 2 Type: Bug Components: Dependencies Versions: 2.0.3 Reporter: Carlos Sanchez Priority:

[jira] Updated: (MNG-2083) Path to missing dependency is not shown nor url to download

2006-02-17 Thread Carlos Sanchez (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2083?page=all ] Carlos Sanchez updated MNG-2083: Description: Seems a regression it's only shown with -X [DEBUG] Unable to download the artifact from any repository Try downloading the file manually from

plugin testing

2006-02-17 Thread Jesse McConnell
brett asked me to look into the idea of a plugin testing framework and having mulled it over a bit and talked to some folks about it I wanted to spill out my thoughts here and a couple of stabs at breaking the nut cleanly. Also, in the interests of having people read this and not have it drag on

RE: plugin testing

2006-02-17 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi Jesse, -Original Message- From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vendredi 17 février 2006 20:40 To: Maven Developers List Subject: plugin testing brett asked me to look into the idea of a plugin testing framework and having mulled it over a bit and talked to

Re: plugin testing

2006-02-17 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I agree that we need both of unit and integration tests - unit tests are currently painful because a lot of core objects don't have a constructor without arguments or don't have constructor and require caling a factory method. We need to agree where to put all that staff (I sent a mail about this

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread John Casey
I'm not sure that's enough, actually. There will be times (there already are) when people will want to set a flag that suppresses the default mojo for a particular phase in the lifecycle mapped by a packaging, then substitute in their own. If that mojo happens to fall ahead of another mojo

Re: plugin testing

2006-02-17 Thread John Casey
Hi Vincent, Vincent Massol wrote: Hi Jesse, [snip] Now, some of plugins can be completely tested by this mechanism while others might not actually fit too tell into this lower level testing. That is where the integration testing comes into more of a play. I talked to john about this and

[jira] Created: (MNG-2084) Jar plugin does not respect the authority of the finalName element

2006-02-17 Thread Binyan (JIRA)
Jar plugin does not respect the authority of the finalName element Key: MNG-2084 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2084 Project: Maven 2 Type: Bug Versions: 2.0.2 Reporter:

Re: plugin testing

2006-02-17 Thread Brett Porter
I think this is the right separation. Unit test to get coverage, add and use setters like Vincent suggested. Integration test to verify things like the lifecycle intereactions, etc. controlled by the annotations at the class level. We can already do both. As Carlos mentioned, getting the objects

[jira] Created: (MAVENUPLOAD-747) HtmlUnit 1.8 upload request

2006-02-17 Thread Brad Clarke (JIRA)
HtmlUnit 1.8 upload request --- Key: MAVENUPLOAD-747 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-747 Project: maven-upload-requests Type: Task Reporter: Brad Clarke http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net/htmlunit-1.8-bundle.jar Team

[jira] Closed: (MNG-2084) Jar plugin does not respect the authority of the finalName element

2006-02-17 Thread Brett Porter (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2084?page=all ] Brett Porter closed MNG-2084: - Assign To: Brett Porter Resolution: Won't Fix finalName doesn't include the extension. There is a related MJAR issue to allow a configurable extension you can

[jira] Commented: (MNG-2084) Jar plugin does not respect the authority of the finalName element

2006-02-17 Thread Binyan (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2084?page=comments#action_58952 ] Binyan commented on MNG-2084: - OK, the problem then lies in the fact that the docs at http://maven.apache.org/maven-model/maven.html state the following for the finalName element:

[jira] Commented: (MJAR-11) extention parametrization

2006-02-17 Thread Binyan (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAR-11?page=comments#action_58953 ] Binyan commented on MJAR-11: In our case we need to jar up a directory structure and give it the extension .war. We would use the war plugin for that except that the directory structure is

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Stephen Duncan
Is ordering necessarily the right way to think about the problem? My usage of Maven is fairly simple, so maybe I'm not really conceptualizing some of the use cases. But I think about more in terms of prerequisites. For instance, I have several assembly tasks that I have attached to the package

[maven2 build trunk - SUCCESS - checkout] Sat Feb 18 00:00:00 GMT 2006

2006-02-17 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/builds/trunk/m2-20060218.01.tar.gz Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/logs/trunk/m2-build-log-20060218.01.txt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

[maven2 build branches/maven-2.0.x - SUCCESS - checkout] Sat Feb 18 00:30:02 GMT 2006

2006-02-17 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/builds/branches/maven-2.0.x/m2-20060218.003003.tar.gz Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/logs/branches/maven-2.0.x/m2-build-log-20060218.003003.txt - To unsubscribe,

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Brett Porter
This reply grabs bits from everywhere and summarises. John Casey wrote: Hi, I'd like to add pre/post phases for all of the major lifecycle phases that don't already have it. For the record, I'm against this as the solution based on the thread so far. Some basic reasons before going into

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Brett Porter
Raphaël Piéroni wrote: - allow the adding of resource post compilation (to have the wsdl in the jar) You can do that by directly copying to target/classes in process-classes. What you are doing is really processing classes as much as generating resources. The only limitation is you can't filter

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Stephen, Stephen Duncan wrote: Is ordering necessarily the right way to think about the problem? My usage of Maven is fairly simple, so maybe I'm not really conceptualizing some of the use cases. But I think about more in terms of prerequisites. For instance, I have several assembly

Please sync org.apache.ws ...

2006-02-17 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
... on /www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository, due to releases of Apache XML-RPC, and the Maven JaxMe plugin. Regards, Jochen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Stephen Duncan
I'll look into the issues. I should've remembered that it would sound familiar, but I only spent a week on Maven 1 before moving to Maven 2... :) -Stephen On 2/17/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Stephen, Stephen Duncan wrote: Is ordering necessarily the right way to think

[jira] Created: (MNG-2085) POM documentation for repository structure looks out of date

2006-02-17 Thread Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)
POM documentation for repository structure looks out of date Key: MNG-2085 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2085 Project: Maven 2 Type: Bug Components: Documentation: Guides Versions:

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-17 Thread Stephen Duncan
On 2/17/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This reply grabs bits from everywhere and summarises. Jesse McConnell wrote: Providing a mechansim of strict execution ordering inside of a lifecycle phase could address this.. We already have an ordering (by inheritence, with profiles

[jira] Updated: (MRM-74) Browse web user interface

2006-02-17 Thread nick gonzalez (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-74?page=all ] nick gonzalez updated MRM-74: - Attachment: (was: maven-repository-webapp-MRM-74.diff) Browse web user interface - Key: MRM-74 URL:

[jira] Updated: (MRM-74) Browse web user interface

2006-02-17 Thread nick gonzalez (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-74?page=all ] nick gonzalez updated MRM-74: - Attachment: maven-repository-webapp-MRM-74.diff Browse web user interface - Key: MRM-74 URL:

Re: Please sync org.apache.ws ...

2006-02-17 Thread Carlos Sanchez
done On 2/17/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... on /www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository, due to releases of Apache XML-RPC, and the Maven JaxMe plugin. Regards, Jochen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: