+1
Lukas
Brett Porter wrote:
A month ago I sent a proposal for discussion, to bring some mojos into
the Maven plugins project, because
a) originally coming from here in Maven 1.x
b) having the core libraries located here
c) being essential to the day to day use of the project.
So, here is a
+1
Lukas
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Fabrice worked on the JXR plugin, fixed a number of bugs in the original
library and improved the mojo. Active on the users list, with a
particular interest in the site plugin, I believe would be a good
addition to the project.
Please vote:
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
+1
Lukas
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Brian has done a great job in keeping the mojo project in order and has
developed the dependency plugin there, which we previously indicated
we'd like to have as a part of the Maven plugin artillery.
He has also actively helped on the users list and
Brett Porter wrote:
That's what it does now, after I made the change. Before it was
/reference/, now it is /maven-1.x/reference.
It wasn't working, Lukas asked me to fix it.
I don't know why you say that, I never contacted you about it. I
couldn't have, as I was on vacation last week.
It was quite some time ago, when the new site location went up. Maybe it
was someone else...
Anyway, all fixed now! :)
- Brett
Lukas Theussl wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
That's what it does now, after I made the change. Before it was
/reference/, now it is /maven-1.x/reference.
It wasn't
Ok I am getting tired to hear Maven documentation is awful. It is such
a wonderful product, I really want to see it adopted massively. I am
considered a good technical writer at my job So I want to give a hand
there. My question, is where should I start?
The urgent need right now seems to be a
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Stephen Duncan wrote:
(I'm cc-ing the dev list, maybe continue there?)
It's Maven's decision: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1978
Brett still hasn't been convinced that provided status should be
transitive. I don't have any particular use case to argue one way or
Thanks for the reminder, Joerg.
As for m1.0 compatibility, as far as I know, only the newer versions of
the artifact plugin are completely incompatible with m1.0.2. Apart from
that, we are trying to keep m1.0.2 compatibility for all plugins. If you
find something that works under m1.1 but not
... but that won't work unless it is in the Maven installation.
Should we add this to the site plugin explicitly until it is upgraded in
2.1?
- Brett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: evenisse
Date: Mon Mar 13 06:46:36 2006
New Revision: 385564
URL:
oh, yes, it will use plexus-utils 1.1
Can we update plexus-utils in maven installation? I know we are in RC phase. Is
it a risk?
1.2 will be release in few days because i need it in continuum
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
... but that won't work unless it is in the Maven installation.
see my comments inline below but in
general +1
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07-03-2006
21:10:53:
This is not too long, and important. Please read.
I've just spent some time discussing this on users@, and felt it was
time to bring it here to look at
Alexandre, I'll be glad to help you in this effort, especially with
the difficult English bits. ;-)
Wayne
On 3/13/06, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok I am getting tired to hear Maven documentation is awful. It is such
a wonderful product, I really want to see it adopted
Hi Alexandre,
There is actually a discussion about the improvement of the site on the dev
list.
May you subscribe and participate ?
I also created a Jira issue for a proposition of improvment:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2143
Regards,
Raphaël
2006/3/13, Wayne Fay [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks like we finally made it! The results for this third vote are as
follows:
Binding: 5 (John, Vincent, Carlos, Brett, Emmanuel)
Non-Binding: 7 (Fabrizio, Alex, Vincent S, Dan, Edwin, Brian, Jesse)
I'm going to start working on the release now. It should be out tomorrow
at the latest.
Hi Everybody,
I was just using the latest deployed 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT version of
surefire and I got this error on the activemq/activemq-jaas module.
Any idea?
[WARNING] POM for 'directory-asn1:asn1-der:pom:0.3.2' is invalid. It
will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM.
Cool! My idea was to start a structured wiki like Wikipedia to be able
to work as a team but I don't want to create another unreadable wiki
like most Apache projects already have. It's great for development
efforts but not enough for end users.
I'll take a look at the discussion first and see
i don't see this problem
On 3/14/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I was just using the latest deployed 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT version of
surefire and I got this error on the activemq/activemq-jaas module.
Any idea?
[WARNING] POM for 'directory-asn1:asn1-der:pom:0.3.2' is
Ok the Maven team already offer a wiki to help write documentation so
I guess we should start writing there. I will give it a try as soon as
possible.
On 3/13/06, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool! My idea was to start a structured wiki like Wikipedia to be able
to work as a team
18 matches
Mail list logo
